|
|
Post by MC2 on Jul 5, 2011 15:05:27 GMT -5
Doesn't being guilty of giving false information basically say you are guilty of the crime accused? If she isn't guilty of committing the murder, what false information did she give? Exactly.
|
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Jul 5, 2011 15:08:35 GMT -5
Giving false information could be anything.
She lied about having a babysitter, and lied about her place of employment. While suspicous and odd, they don't prove murder.
|
|
|
|
Post by Scotty on Jul 5, 2011 15:11:41 GMT -5
Giving false information could be anything. She lied about having a babysitter, and lied about her place of employment. While suspicous and odd, they don't prove murder. neither does her searching how to make chloraform (fail  ) or the smell of a dead body in her car. Not to mention that she was partying the days after the child was killed and didnt report hre missing for 30 days. |
|
|
|
Post by MC2 on Jul 5, 2011 15:11:44 GMT -5
Giving false information could be anything. She lied about having a babysitter, and lied about her place of employment. While suspicous and odd, they don't prove murder. Well I didn't know what the information was about, assumed it was about her daughters disappearance/death. |
|
|
|
Post by spamdfms101 on Jul 5, 2011 15:13:25 GMT -5
She started crying when they announced she wasn't guilty, probably because she felt bad for doing it. Please tell me you're joking. |
|
|
|
Post by Scotty on Jul 5, 2011 15:15:52 GMT -5
She started crying when they announced she wasn't guilty, probably because she felt bad for doing it. Please tell me you're joking. hes not. |
|
bencw
Main Eventer
30 refs. aka ecworiginal.
Joined on: Dec 22, 2008 8:04:49 GMT -5
Posts: 4,273
|
Post by bencw on Jul 5, 2011 15:28:47 GMT -5
I've only read a bit about this case, so can someone tell me what the court actually thinks happened to the poor kid if her mother didn't kill her?
|
|
|
|
Post by OverTheEdge on Jul 5, 2011 15:30:45 GMT -5
It's not a matter of them not thinking she's not guilty, it's a matter of them not being able to adequately prove it. Therefore, they made the right decision. The burden of proof lies on the courts to prove that she's guilty, not on her to prove that she's not. If there was even the smallest shred of reasonable doubt, then they'd have no business of saying she is. Don't get me wrong though, she's more than likely getting away with what she did, or, at the very least, played a big part in.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Jul 5, 2011 15:35:14 GMT -5
I really.. Don't understand why everyone is getting so worked up over this. There is no proof showing she did it. Sure she didn't contact police when her child was missing and was out being a "slut/party girl" etc.. But they still have no proof that she killed her daughter. Simple as that, they made the right call. Not Guilty. The only obvious thing she did was lie, which is what she's guilty of. they can't just say " well, it looks like she did this, but we don't have enough evidence to prove she killed her daughter, we're still going to make her guilty. "
|
|
|
|
Post by MacReady on Jul 5, 2011 16:01:08 GMT -5
I really.. Don't understand why everyone is getting so worked up over this. There is no proof showing she did it. Sure she didn't contact police when her child was missing and was out being a "slut/party girl" etc.. But they still have no proof that she killed her daughter. Simple as that, they made the right call. Not Guilty. The only obvious thing she did was lie, which is what she's guilty of. they can't just say " well, it looks like she did this, but we don't have enough evidence to prove she killed her daughter, we're still going to make her guilty. " |
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Jul 5, 2011 16:30:01 GMT -5
I really.. Don't understand why everyone is getting so worked up over this. There is no proof showing she did it. Sure she didn't contact police when her child was missing and was out being a "slut/party girl" etc.. But they still have no proof that she killed her daughter. Simple as that, they made the right call. Not Guilty. The only obvious thing she did was lie, which is what she's guilty of. they can't just say " well, it looks like she did this, but we don't have enough evidence to prove she killed her daughter, we're still going to make her guilty. " |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Ralphio on Jul 5, 2011 16:32:56 GMT -5
Black eye for America today.
|
|
|
|
Post by MC2 on Jul 5, 2011 16:33:36 GMT -5
If they had hired consultant Shawn Spencer they could have found Anthony guilty on all counts.  |
|
|
|
Post by Grumpyoldman on Jul 5, 2011 16:39:47 GMT -5
Guilty or not guilty- just think how awful the rest of her life is going to be. Do you think she can go out in public without hearing a remark or comment anymore? I guarantee her tires will be slashed repeatedly, she'll be getting harassing phone calls & letters, and she'll be the talk of any town she moves to.
I think she's in the same boat as Jon-Benet Ramsey's parents were.
|
|
|
|
Post by KMIS™ on Jul 5, 2011 16:42:12 GMT -5
^ So, I ask again, if she didn't kill her daughter, then who did?? Where is the proof she did kill him? From what I remember, you said the US didn't kill Osama because they wouldn't provide the proof they did. So I ask you, good sir, where is the proof she did kill the kid? |
|
|
|
Post by 1992 on Jul 5, 2011 16:43:21 GMT -5
Guilty or not guilty- just think how awful the rest of her life is going to be. Do you think she can go out in public without hearing a remark or comment anymore? I guarantee her tires will be slashed repeatedly, she'll be getting harassing phone calls & letters, and she'll be the talk of any town she moves to. I think she's in the same boat as Jon-Benet Ramsey's parents were. She'll also get book deals, which will probably turn into movie deals. She'll be the hottest commodity for any talk show for a good while. By the time this is all said and done, the bitch will probably be able to buy her own town. |
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Jul 5, 2011 16:44:36 GMT -5
Not guilty...Wow....I'm  ing stunned... If she didn't kill her daughter, then who the did?? I think I've just lost all faith and hope in the U.S. Justice system...A ing joke. End of story. Real talk! I think I want to be a lawyer/prosecuter now to prevent similar injustices. So ing wrong that this sociopath c*nt got off free after killing her daughter!   |
|
|
|
Post by mikey1974 on Jul 5, 2011 16:51:35 GMT -5
Bored Jury = "Not Guilty...Let's go home....Everyone in favor say I." you know.... while they had that defense attorney on giving his speech/rant,the one about all the attorney's in America and the media giving a verdict even though they weren't involved in the case,and how the media and attorney's should be ashamed of themselves....the one female juror behind him was nodding up and down,like she agreed with everything he was saying about the media and people jumping the gun.... um....that felt fishy to me....like,weren't they all sequestered? wasn't she suppossed to have no access to TV,Intenet,or anything that would mention or pertain to the case? she seemed to be completely agreeing with the lawyers condemning everyone for assigning the guilt before the verdict came in,which,technically,she SHOULD have had no knowledge of,if the rules were followed....could the "Not Guilty's" have been to SPITE the media and all the people who believed she was guilty? jury tampering? just saying,she seemed a little TOO into his speech....wonder if perhaps she already came in with a pre-formed opinion on the case,regardless of any facts laid out to her? and were others like that too? |
|
|
|
Post by Tye Hyll on Jul 5, 2011 16:55:31 GMT -5
Guilty or not guilty- just think how awful the rest of her life is going to be. Do you think she can go out in public without hearing a remark or comment anymore? I guarantee her tires will be slashed repeatedly, she'll be getting harassing phone calls & letters, and she'll be the talk of any town she moves to. I think she's in the same boat as Jon-Benet Ramsey's parents were. She'll also get book deals, which will probably turn into movie deals. She'll be the hottest commodity for any talk show for a good while. By the time this is all said and done, the bitch will probably be able to buy her own town. Exactly, with the money she will pull in from interviews and royalties to her likeness she can buy a new identity, she'll be fine. Oh and btw, living a Chocolate Sharkty life outside of prison is better than living a great life in jail. |
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Jul 5, 2011 16:58:20 GMT -5
^ So, I ask again, if she didn't kill her daughter, then who did?? OJ. |
|
