|
|
Post by twinn on Oct 20, 2011 16:55:59 GMT -5
It is baffling to me that you honestly can't see that you  ed up the league |
|
|
|
Post by "The Visionary" Eldniw on Oct 20, 2011 21:35:52 GMT -5
It is baffling to me that you honestly can't see that you ed up the league Games are still being played. Everyone still has players on their teams. Nothing is ruined. Besides, how the hell does me making a Vick for Brady trade "compromise integrity" but TRW trading his ENTIRE TEAM for an entire lineup of Atlanta Falcons players not? How the hell does that not get brought up?! |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Ralphio on Oct 20, 2011 21:40:59 GMT -5
You seem to forget, TRW did that after you and KSL had your make out mutiny pow wow of ruining the league.
Thats why its never brought up
|
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Oct 20, 2011 21:50:03 GMT -5
No crimes were committed. I've made 2 deals, both of which benefited me in the long run - from the fantasy football standpoint, as I'm 3-0 since the trades and from the fan standpoint, as I got a player....erm, players, that I really like in Steve Smith and Michael Vick. How is that ruining anything? Stop acting like this is at all a legitimate trade. Steve Smith has 5 catches on the year, okay? He's not fantasy relevant whatsoever, even in deep leagues. If you trade Adrian Peterson for Beanie Wells straight-up and Adrian Peterson tears his ACL the next week, that still doesn't change the fact that the trade was ing ridiculous amounts of bullcrapwhen it happened. Hindsight is 20/20 that Marques Colston got hurt and you've benefited from getting Rice in that trade so far, but it's pretty obvious that you got completely raped. You gave up the No. 1 QB and a first round pick at RB for a lower-scoring QB, two players that aren't worth crap(Spiller, Smith), a RB who shares carries and a WR who was coming off of an injury and has a borderline intellectually- disabled quarterback throwing him the ball. |
|
|
|
Post by "The Visionary" Eldniw on Oct 21, 2011 1:09:48 GMT -5
No crimes were committed. I've made 2 deals, both of which benefited me in the long run - from the fantasy football standpoint, as I'm 3-0 since the trades and from the fan standpoint, as I got a player....erm, players, that I really like in Steve Smith and Michael Vick. How is that ruining anything? Stop acting like this is at all a legitimate trade. Steve Smith has 5 catches on the year, okay? He's not fantasy relevant whatsoever, even in deep leagues. If you trade Adrian Peterson for Beanie Wells straight-up and Adrian Peterson tears his ACL the next week, that still doesn't change the fact that the trade was ing ridiculous amounts of bullpoop when it happened. Hindsight is 20/20 that Marques Colston got hurt and you've benefited from getting Rice in that trade so far, but it's pretty obvious that you got completely raped. You gave up the No. 1 QB and a first round pick at RB for a lower-scoring QB, two players that aren't worth poop (Spiller, Smith), a RB who shares carries and a WR who was coming off of an injury and has a borderline intellectually- disabled quarterback throwing him the ball. And that "borderline intellectually- disabled" QB has outscored Tom Brady every week since the trade, with the exception of Week 6, WHERE THE TWO TIED at 16 points. |
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Oct 21, 2011 20:58:26 GMT -5
And that "borderline intellectually- disabled" QB has outscored Tom Brady every week since the trade, with the exception of Week 6, WHERE THE TWO TIED at 16 points. ... Is Mike Vick throwing to Sidney Rice? Pretty sure Tarvaris Jackson hasn't outscored anyone, there, chap. |
|
|
|
Post by "The Visionary" Eldniw on Oct 22, 2011 19:08:32 GMT -5
Okay but you said a receiver coming off an injury, like Steve Smith was, and I also got him in the deal. Nice backpedal though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Oct 22, 2011 19:45:51 GMT -5
Okay but you said a receiver coming off an injury, like Steve Smith was, and I also got him in the deal. Nice backpedal though. Look at what I typed in that list. I had already mentioned Smith. I was quite obviously talking about Rice (who was coming off of an injury and has a borderline intellectually- disabled quarterback). Nice reading comprehension, though. |
|
|
|
Post by twinn on Oct 23, 2011 18:41:08 GMT -5
lol @ BV and my matchup this week
|
|
|
|
Post by BV on Oct 23, 2011 22:30:56 GMT -5
figures the two teams with the best records have the worst scoring game so far
|
|
|
|
Post by "The Visionary" Eldniw on Oct 23, 2011 22:38:15 GMT -5
Okay but you said a receiver coming off an injury, like Steve Smith was, and I also got him in the deal. Nice backpedal though. Look at what I typed in that list. I had already mentioned Smith. I was quite obviously talking about Rice (who was coming off of an injury and has a borderline intellectually- disabled quarterback). Nice reading comprehension, though. My turn. Check what you typed. It's not clear. You said Spiller and Smith, and then DIRECTLY AFTER proceeded to say a RB who shares carries - Spiller does - and a WR coming off injury - Smith was. I have fine reading comprehension, thanks much. You never mentioned Tolbert or Rice. Don't say you did either. |
|
|
|
Post by Cult Member BriGuy on Oct 23, 2011 23:08:31 GMT -5
tolbert shares carries
|
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Oct 24, 2011 16:04:19 GMT -5
Look at what I typed in that list. I had already mentioned Smith. I was quite obviously talking about Rice (who was coming off of an injury and has a borderline intellectually- disabled quarterback). Nice reading comprehension, though. My turn. Check what you typed. It's not clear. You said Spiller and Smith, and then DIRECTLY AFTER proceeded to say a RB who shares carries - Spiller does - and a WR coming off injury - Smith was. I have fine reading comprehension, thanks much. You never mentioned Tolbert or Rice. Don't say you did either. Why would I mention Spiller and Smith twice, you ing dumbass? Jesus Christ. |
|
