|
|
Post by LtD73 on Nov 30, 2011 6:21:34 GMT -5
Last year we saw the biggest Royal Rumble in history where there was an unprecedented 40 entrants. The Scottrade Center in St. Louis is advertising for a 30 man Royal Rumble along with a WWE and World Heavyweight Championship match.
|
|
|
|
Post by thehardys4life on Nov 30, 2011 6:58:53 GMT -5
Thats 10 less people hornswoggle has to throw out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eat Defeat. on Nov 30, 2011 7:19:48 GMT -5
I don't mind this. 40 people every year is overkill.
|
|
|
|
Post by done on Nov 30, 2011 7:25:06 GMT -5
Last year we saw the biggest Royal Rumble in history where there was an unprecedented 40 entrants. The Scottrade Center in St. Louis is advertising for a 30 man Royal Rumble along with a WWE and World Heavyweight Championship match. wasn't the 40 man this year? I don't mind it going back to 30 but I hope that in wwe 13 we get the option of 10 man or 20 or 30 or 40 man RR. |
|
Sami Hazard
Main Eventer
I don't answer to a higher power, I am a higher power.
Joined on: Mar 17, 2006 18:27:17 GMT -5
Posts: 3,390
|
Post by Sami Hazard on Nov 30, 2011 7:42:53 GMT -5
Last year we saw the biggest Royal Rumble in history where there was an unprecedented 40 entrants. The Scottrade Center in St. Louis is advertising for a 30 man Royal Rumble along with a WWE and World Heavyweight Championship match. wasn't the 40 man this year? I don't mind it going back to 30 but I hope that in wwe 13 we get the option of 10 man or 20 or 30 or 40 man RR. We already do. |
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Nov 30, 2011 8:17:49 GMT -5
Im fine with it, should mean the rest of the card wont be as lackluster. 40 probably takes too much talent that could be used elsewhere on the card so its not always a one match PPV. Ziggler is the exception of course.  |
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Nov 30, 2011 9:19:55 GMT -5
Last year we saw the biggest Royal Rumble in history where there was an unprecedented 40 entrants. The Scottrade Center in St. Louis is advertising for a 30 man Royal Rumble along with a WWE and World Heavyweight Championship match. I don't mind it going back to 30 but I hope that in wwe 13 we get the option of 10 man or 20 or 30 or 40 man RR. Its just the same as when Michael Cole said Rock vs Cena at this years Wrestlemania |
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Nov 30, 2011 9:46:03 GMT -5
thank god. i really didn't like the 40-man anyway.
30 is the perfect number for the Royal Rumble
|
|
|
|
Post by nightowl on Nov 30, 2011 9:58:47 GMT -5
I'm glad it's going back to 30-man. There was something about the 40-man that I didn't like. It just seemed like it dragged on and on.
|
|
|
|
Post by wabarrett on Nov 30, 2011 10:19:41 GMT -5
The 40-man Rumble was such a bad idea. 'Let's break a 20+ year tradition just for the sake of getting all of The Corre and The New Nexus in the match.' It dragged on so much.
|
|
|
|
Post by Byron F'N Saxton Fan on Nov 30, 2011 11:20:48 GMT -5
I don't blame them for doing the 40-man since it wasn't something they've promoted in a long time and they did have a lot of people who you could make an argument for getting in that wouldn't have with just 30 men. That said, while I thought last year's Rumble was fine, it's not something I particularly want to see again, at least for a while. Have that be the promotional tool you pull out every 8-10 years and return the Rumble match back to 30 entrants as it's been for so long.
|
|
ncw
Superstar
Joined on: Jun 5, 2011 14:33:51 GMT -5
Posts: 846
|
Post by ncw on Nov 30, 2011 11:47:13 GMT -5
I dont see too much of a problem with it. They could just stick some NXT guys in the match.
|
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Nov 30, 2011 11:56:16 GMT -5
I'm a fan of 30. I thought the Rumble was entertaining with 40 but it just seems unnecessary to me. Additionally, I don't really care for anyone except Ziggler working twice in a night. I'm sure we will get two good World Title matches and "The biggest Rumble ever!" plug won't be necessary.
|
|
|
|
Post by BØRNS on Nov 30, 2011 15:15:34 GMT -5
Good. They'll have time for another match or two.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 12:30:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2011 15:20:32 GMT -5
I loved the 40 man Royal Rumble but it definitely was a little much. I'm glad they've decided to return to the original format, it was working fine. I just hope we have more surprise entrants, seeing as I will most likely be going to the event.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nivro™ on Nov 30, 2011 15:21:45 GMT -5
40 man was awful. Honestly, until WWE starts developing better...30 sometimes is pushing it. With 30 you still get a lot of jobbers and curtain jerkers in it that you know dont stand a chance. If you could choose 20 top legit superstars it would be more impressive. However, the rumble has almost always been 30. Its tradition. So I wont complain.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 12:30:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2011 15:21:59 GMT -5
The 40-man Rumble was such a bad idea. 'Let's break a 20+ year tradition just for the sake of getting all of The Corre and The New Nexus in the match.' It dragged on so much. I figured it was so WWE could point at del Rio and say "hey look at this guy, he won the ONLY 40 man Royal Rumble!" |
|
CHEF
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Jul 8, 2009 13:03:59 GMT -5
Posts: 282
|
Post by CHEF on Nov 30, 2011 16:19:13 GMT -5
maybe they could make this years rumble for the wwe championship?
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Nov 30, 2011 16:44:16 GMT -5
I thought the 40 man RR was great, it's too bad they aren't keeping it that way.
|
|
|
|
Post by done on Nov 30, 2011 16:51:26 GMT -5
wasn't the 40 man this year? I don't mind it going back to 30 but I hope that in wwe 13 we get the option of 10 man or 20 or 30 or 40 man RR. We already do. I said wwe 13, since we are going back to30. |
|
