|
|
Post by LtD73 on Dec 5, 2011 14:01:48 GMT -5
Even before this year's box office hit sequel, The Hangover Part II, opened, director Todd Phillips was announcing that a third Wolf Pack adventure would both happen and be planned as an end to the franchise. "Obviously we always envisioned it as a trilogy," he said back in May, "The third would be very much a finale and an ending... As far as where it takes place, I'm very open." Today, it looks like we might have the answer to that location question, straight from one of the series' leads, Bradley Cooper. He appeared tonight on the BBC's The Graham Norton Show and explained the following (via Bleeding Cool): "I think that we adhered to the formula in the second one, for those who’ve seen it, and the third one, I think, which would close the whole trilogy… I think it'll take place in Los Angeles and maybe not adhere to the structure. It might be different." Though no dates have officially been announced (and even the title itself is tentative), The Hangover Part III could go into production as early as next year for a 2013 release. Cooper added, "I hope we're gonna start shooting in September. I know that Todd Phillips is working on the script." In addition to Cooper, Ed Helms and Zach Galifianakis are definitely set to return. -Comingsoon.net  CAN'T WAIT. |
|
OYDK?
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 22, 2011 13:55:27 GMT -5
Posts: 2,676
|
Post by OYDK? on Dec 5, 2011 14:08:55 GMT -5
Hangover II was terribad, so I can only imagine how awful this one will be.
|
|
|
|
Post by jacobcole on Dec 5, 2011 14:09:44 GMT -5
I actually didn't mind the second one as much as some people I know. So I'm for it.
|
|
|
|
Post by HugoOne on Dec 5, 2011 14:49:12 GMT -5
It's not so much that the second one was bad, but it was just mostly rehashed material from the first, and slightly altered. It was underwhelming more than anything, after how great the first one was. If they vary the formula up, I'd be all for a third one.
|
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Dec 5, 2011 14:50:07 GMT -5
It's not so much that the second one was bad, but it was just mostly rehashed material from the first, and slightly altered. It was underwhelming more than anything, after how great the first one was. If they vary the formula up, I'd be all for a third one. Home Alone 1 and 2.... |
|
OYDK?
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 22, 2011 13:55:27 GMT -5
Posts: 2,676
|
Post by OYDK? on Dec 5, 2011 15:01:33 GMT -5
It's not so much that the second one was bad, but it was just mostly rehashed material from the first, and slightly altered. It was underwhelming more than anything, after how great the first one was. If they vary the formula up, I'd be all for a third one. Home Alone 1 and 2.... That's not a very good example considering Home Alone 2 is terrible, too. |
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Dec 5, 2011 15:05:15 GMT -5
That's not a very good example considering Home Alone 2 is terrible, too. I was making the point of Home alone 1 and 2 being the same story just altered |
|
|
|
Post by trojanpridev on Dec 5, 2011 15:08:59 GMT -5
I hope they do something unique, unfortunately we all know it will be the same jokes because they know people will see it regardless.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 12:40:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2011 15:37:39 GMT -5
That's not a very good example considering Home Alone 2 is terrible, too. I was making the point of Home alone 1 and 2 being the same story just altered How dare you speak ill of the first two Home Alone films like that. The first film he was home by himself, the second film he was by himself in new york city! Plus different shennanigans happen! But yeah anyway if they do a new story with the same writers and all I'd be for it. Like others said, it wasn't that Hangover II was bad, it was just all stuff that was in the first film. |
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Dec 5, 2011 16:49:59 GMT -5
ah for  s sake. bad news. |
|
|
|
Post by The Boondock Syxx on Dec 5, 2011 17:14:50 GMT -5
eh i really didnt like hangover 2 for two reasons, i hated the setting and i hated that it was a carbon copy of the first i mean there can be sequels that are the same idea or plot but im talking about the scenes were IDENTICAL, tooth/tattoo, tiger/old man fron monk place, baby/monkey, eddie the wedding guy/ eddie the pimp, police involved/police involved, horrible dyhydration and sun burn to missing guy/missing finger on missing guy, wedding/wedding, drugged/drugged i mean identical
i think hangover 2 would be much funnier to me if hangover 1 didnt exist but it does oh well if they changed everything in the third then maybe it could work but i cant see it doing as well as the other two since people know how bad the second was
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Dec 5, 2011 17:30:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Dec 5, 2011 17:33:05 GMT -5
That's not a very good example considering Home Alone 2 is terrible, too. I was making the point of Home alone 1 and 2 being the same story just altered A better example might be Blues Brothers 2000. |
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Dec 5, 2011 17:45:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Ralphio on Dec 5, 2011 18:00:33 GMT -5
Hangover 2 was EXACTLY like #1, how ing lame do you hafta be? And even worse TO DO IT A 3RD TIME!?! |
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Dec 5, 2011 18:20:31 GMT -5
I don't have much an issue as long as they truly try to make it different this time around. It's not that the second one was bad, it was just essentially the same movie done again in a different city.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 12:40:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2011 19:30:19 GMT -5
The thing is, and I bring it up everytime, that they straight up said that the second one is basically the same movie. If you couldn't tell from the plot or the trailers, then you have to be blind. You knew what you were getting into. So if you go and see the third, and it is just like the first two, you have no reason to bitch.
|
|
|
|
Post by Noza on Dec 5, 2011 19:46:08 GMT -5
Like others, I also hated The Hangover: Part II. Not funny at all and was, essentially, a remake of the first one. If the third one looks the same, then I shall avoid it all together.
|
|
Captain d00m - Mr. 3000
Main Eventer
Bringing death and destruction since 2005!
Joined on: Dec 2, 2005 20:52:43 GMT -5
Posts: 3,376
|
Post by Captain d00m - Mr. 3000 on Dec 5, 2011 20:17:33 GMT -5
I didn't like the first one, and never saw the second one. Won't be seeing this one if it comes out.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Dec 6, 2011 1:03:19 GMT -5
I think I'll wait to see it on dvd.
I would not be surprised if they made a 4th film or a spin off if the third one does well.
|
|
