|
Post by LtD73 on Jan 24, 2012 8:05:38 GMT -5
Do you think they will be in the rumble match, or whoever the World Champions are due to them being involved in that promo video where it said that for the first time ever everyone is eligible to be in the Rumble match
|
|
|
Post by Irish Wrestling Entertainment on Jan 24, 2012 8:20:31 GMT -5
The people who are World Champions shouldn't be in the match.
The point of the match is to get a shot at becoming the World Champion so it wouldn't really make sense to be honest.
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Jan 24, 2012 9:20:27 GMT -5
I hope not, what an awful waste of a spot/s that would be.
|
|
Brankind
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 3, 2006 7:42:42 GMT -5
Posts: 1,364
|
Post by Brankind on Jan 24, 2012 9:26:46 GMT -5
why would they? if they win they face ... themselves?
|
|
Spz
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 18, 2006 23:16:03 GMT -5
Posts: 1,949
|
Post by Spz on Jan 24, 2012 9:49:08 GMT -5
cm punk will win and face taker at mania streak vs title match
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Jan 24, 2012 10:30:41 GMT -5
why would they? if they win they face ... themselves? Sounds like a guaranteed win at WrestleMania. I strongly believe that if the WWE Title match happens prior to the Rumble, that we see one of Punk or Ziggler take advantage of jumping into the Rumble.
|
|
|
Post by wabarrett on Jan 24, 2012 10:32:18 GMT -5
The WWE and World Champion won't enter. That would be uteerly pointless.
I have a strong feeling the losers of the WWE and World Title matches will enter though. I wouldn't bet against punksnotdead's prediction.
|
|
|
Post by ASR (therockisback) on Jan 24, 2012 11:23:55 GMT -5
Bryan and Punk will retain leading to Show/Henry/Ziggler all appearing in the Rumble. Having the Champions appear would be stupid.
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Jan 24, 2012 11:33:32 GMT -5
If they are stressing for the first time ever anyone can enter. So divas could be in and I could see Punk & Bryan in. If either wins they would just face the other champion to gain both world titles. Or say they lose it at Elimination Chamber either still have a title shot at Mania.
|
|
|
Post by wabarrett on Jan 24, 2012 11:39:17 GMT -5
If they are stressing for the first time ever anyone can enter. So divas could be in and I could see Punk & Bryan in. If either wins they would just face the other champion to gain both world titles. Or say they lose it at Elimination Chamber either still have a title shot at Mania. That'd piss me off a treat.
|
|
|
Post by Kody on Jan 24, 2012 13:23:56 GMT -5
I'm guessing that either Punk or Bryan wins the Rumble, and they go on to face the other at Wrestlemania in a WWE/World Title unification match.
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Jan 24, 2012 15:19:57 GMT -5
I'd love for Punk to win and then use his shot to unify the titles at WM.
|
|
|
Post by The Natural Eddy Valintino on Jan 24, 2012 15:39:56 GMT -5
I don't think the WWE or World Champion will be in the match, it'll be pointless for them to be in the match, but then again in 2008, Chavo Guerrero was in the Rumble and he was ECW Champion, a title the rumble winner could choose to face at Wrestlemania. I do however see the losers of the title matches in the Rumble Match. For this reason alone, I wanted the 40 man Royal Rumble Match to return this year.
|
|
Nathan from Aus
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 3, 2010 19:58:33 GMT -5
Posts: 1,277
|
Post by Nathan from Aus on Jan 24, 2012 15:52:35 GMT -5
I don't think the WWE or World Champion will be in the match, it'll be pointless for them to be in the match, but then again in 2008, Chavo Guerrero was in the Rumble and he was ECW Champion, a title the rumble winner could choose to face at Wrestlemania. I do however see the losers of the title matches in the Rumble Match. For this reason alone, I wanted the 40 man Royal Rumble Match to return this year. Why would you need a 40 man Rumble to compensate for the losers of the title matches? For YEARS the guys who lost their title match have been entering the Royal Rumble. It even happened last year with Randy Orton AND Dolph Ziggler both entering.
|
|