|
Post by ztj_wwf on Jan 29, 2012 23:49:44 GMT -5
Awful Rumble...instead of Taker, Christian, HHH, Nash...we get Cole, King, Khali, Hacksaw? And Sheamus wins? WTF? I really hope this doesn't mean Jericho/Punk isn't happening.
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Jan 29, 2012 23:50:01 GMT -5
I enjoyed it for the most part and the people who watched it with me were in the same boat.
|
|
|
Post by comintogetcha on Jan 30, 2012 0:04:42 GMT -5
Too many marks here. The Rumble match sucked. Way too much comedy, and way too many jobbers. When you go in know there's only about three or four guys that realistically have a chance of winning, you've got a problem. WWE's lack of roster depth was exposed here, as well as their inability to commit to actually pushing anyone and making them look like a real star. Sheamus won, but who cares, that match will be fourth from the top on Wrestlemania at best.
The other thing that hurt this show was that the crowd was dead for just about everything except the Cena match, and the few nostalgia surprises. The commentary was awful too, and that really hurt this show a lot.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 24, 2024 6:18:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2012 0:06:41 GMT -5
Too many marks here. The Rumble match sucked. Way too much comedy, and way too many jobbers. When you go in know there's only about three or four guys that realistically have a chance of winning, you've got a problem. WWE's lack of roster depth was exposed here, as well as their inability to commit to actually pushing anyone and making them look like a real star. Sheamus won, but who cares, that match will be fourth from the top on Wrestlemania at best. The other thing that hurt this show was that the crowd was dead for just about everything except the Cena match, and the few nostalgia surprises. The commentary was awful too, and that really hurt this show a lot. God forbid someone actually enjoys something you didn't.
|
|
Spoder Juan
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 18, 2011 21:36:12 GMT -5
Posts: 1,367
|
Post by Spoder Juan on Jan 30, 2012 0:08:18 GMT -5
Too many marks here. The Rumble match sucked. Way too much comedy, and way too many jobbers. When you go in know there's only about three or four guys that realistically have a chance of winning, you've got a problem. WWE's lack of roster depth was exposed here, as well as their inability to commit to actually pushing anyone and making them look like a real star. Sheamus won, but who cares, that match will be fourth from the top on Wrestlemania at best. The other thing that hurt this show was that the crowd was dead for just about everything except the Cena match, and the few nostalgia surprises. The commentary was awful too, and that really hurt this show a lot. God forbid someone actually enjoys something you didn't.
|
|
|
Post by MacReady on Jan 30, 2012 0:09:16 GMT -5
Too many marks here. The Rumble match sucked. Way too much comedy, and way too many jobbers. When you go in know there's only about three or four guys that realistically have a chance of winning, you've got a problem. WWE's lack of roster depth was exposed here, as well as their inability to commit to actually pushing anyone and making them look like a real star. Sheamus won, but who cares, that match will be fourth from the top on Wrestlemania at best. The other thing that hurt this show was that the crowd was dead for just about everything except the Cena match, and the few nostalgia surprises. The commentary was awful too, and that really hurt this show a lot. God forbid someone actually enjoys something you didn't. See Philly, we don't have to disagree ALL the time! ;D Nice Sheamus sig too!
|
|
|
Post by comintogetcha on Jan 30, 2012 0:10:04 GMT -5
Too many marks here. The Rumble match sucked. Way too much comedy, and way too many jobbers. When you go in know there's only about three or four guys that realistically have a chance of winning, you've got a problem. WWE's lack of roster depth was exposed here, as well as their inability to commit to actually pushing anyone and making them look like a real star. Sheamus won, but who cares, that match will be fourth from the top on Wrestlemania at best. The other thing that hurt this show was that the crowd was dead for just about everything except the Cena match, and the few nostalgia surprises. The commentary was awful too, and that really hurt this show a lot. God forbid someone actually enjoys something you didn't. I don't care if someone enjoys something, but give a reason as to why you enjoyed it. What was enjoyable about it? I have yet to read any legitimate reasons as to why people liked this show. I laid out my argument, now lay out yours.
|
|
Spoder Juan
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 18, 2011 21:36:12 GMT -5
Posts: 1,367
|
Post by Spoder Juan on Jan 30, 2012 0:10:08 GMT -5
WWE is pushing there roster, Lets face it the injuries didn't really help the rumble I mean really, we shoulda had Rey, Sin Cara, Christian and Alberto in there then it would of been better then guys like Michael Cole, Jey Uso, Big Show and The Great Khali who entered.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 24, 2024 6:18:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2012 0:11:05 GMT -5
God forbid someone actually enjoys something you didn't. See Philly, we don't have to disagree ALL the time! ;D Nice Sheamus sig too! I'm pretty sure our last little disagreement was our first. May there be many more to come. ;D
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 24, 2024 6:18:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2012 0:11:27 GMT -5
God forbid someone actually enjoys something you didn't. I don't care if someone enjoys something, but give a reason as to why you enjoyed it. What was enjoyable about it? I have yet to read any legitimate reasons as to why people liked this show. I laid out my argument, now lay out yours. What's the point? So you can label them a mark and disagree with everything they say?
|
|
The End 2012
Mid-Carder
"Ever heard of Ebay...it's your friend!"-Queen
Joined on: May 29, 2010 19:38:15 GMT -5
Posts: 431
|
Post by The End 2012 on Jan 30, 2012 0:11:32 GMT -5
I loved this year's Rumble. Cena/Kane's story still continues which I cannot wait for. Sheamus wins the Rumble, Bryan retains and surprisingly I'm happy Jericho didn't win. Pretty good show and MNR will be something I cannot miss.
|
|
|
Post by comintogetcha on Jan 30, 2012 0:12:27 GMT -5
I don't care if someone enjoys something, but give a reason as to why you enjoyed it. What was enjoyable about it? I have yet to read any legitimate reasons as to why people liked this show. I laid out my argument, now lay out yours. What's the point? So you can label them a mark and disagree with everything they say? Thanks your proving my point, you've done all the work for me, I appreciate it.
|
|
dgnr8
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 12, 2006 11:38:01 GMT -5
Posts: 3,914
|
Post by dgnr8 on Jan 30, 2012 0:13:45 GMT -5
I thought the Rumble was discouraging. It seemed like the match was filled with unsatisfying lower to mid-card performers and offered only Sheamus, Jericho, Foley, and Orton (God, how I hate Orton) as believable candidates to headline Mania. The match was sluggish, the action was dull and the ending was almost predictably disappointing.
A-ry, Big Show, James Uso, Khali, Kharma, Jim Duggan, Michael Cole, Jerry Lawler and to a lesser extent Justin Gabriel and Miz were ALL underwhelming names for the biggest match of one of WWE's "Big Four" and all left something to be desired.
This PPV served only to highlight that WWE currently does not have the star-power to support this type of match.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 24, 2024 6:18:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2012 0:14:00 GMT -5
What's the point? So you can label them a mark and disagree with everything they say? Thanks your proving my point, you've done all the work for me, I appreciate it. Ok. What I liked. Daniel Bryan retained. CM Punk retained. CM Punk vs Dolph Ziggler was really good. The rumble had some great, funny moments. Sheamus won. Happy?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 24, 2024 6:18:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2012 0:14:59 GMT -5
God forbid someone actually enjoys something you didn't. I don't care if someone enjoys something, but give a reason as to why you enjoyed it. What was enjoyable about it? I have yet to read any legitimate reasons as to why people liked this show. I laid out my argument, now lay out yours. I enjoyed it because I don't sit there and over analyze it. I used to be like you hating on everything the WWE did, but then I realized I was being a dumbass. I mean sure the star power in the Rumble wasn't there but it was pretty enjoyable for what it was. Socko vs. Cobra had me laughing my ass off. I marked the hell out for Kharma and Road Dogg and Jericho and Sheamus had a great final few minutes at the end of the Rumble. I was also surprised by Sheamus winning which made it all the better. I laughed my ass off, marked out, saw great back and forth action and was surprised by the winner. Honestly to me that's what the Royal Rumble is all about.
|
|
|
Post by MacReady on Jan 30, 2012 0:15:04 GMT -5
See Philly, we don't have to disagree ALL the time! ;D Nice Sheamus sig too! I'm pretty sure our last little disagreement was our first. May there be many more to come. ;D Looking forward to it! PS, Max, you complain too much about EVERYTHING that goes on in WWE currently, and then have the stones to call OTHER people marks? Take a look in the mirror. You drop all this "insider" talk like it makes you smarter than others. Nobody owes you an explanation why they enjoyed the Rumble, but you know what here's mine: I like Sheamus, Sheamus won. Very simple.
|
|
|
Post by comintogetcha on Jan 30, 2012 0:18:34 GMT -5
Thanks your proving my point, you've done all the work for me, I appreciate it. Ok. What I liked. Daniel Bryan retained. CM Punk retained. CM Punk vs Dolph Ziggler was really good. The rumble had some great, funny moments. Sheamus won. Happy? Ok, so you enjoyed the outcomes, but that speaks very little for the show itself. Daniel Bryan retained in a lousy match that went less than 10 minutes during which he got very little offense. CM Punk won in a good match that was tainted by a stupid overbooked finish. What were the funny moments in the Rumble? I must have missed them. So you enjoyed the finishes. If the Giants win the Superbowl, but it's the worst game ever, the game is a total blowout, botched plays everywhere, it's just a complete mess, would a Giants fan still say they enjoyed the game just because their team won? Of course not, they would say it was a terrible game, but they are glad their team won.
|
|
|
Post by MacReady on Jan 30, 2012 0:19:55 GMT -5
Ok. What I liked. Daniel Bryan retained. CM Punk retained. CM Punk vs Dolph Ziggler was really good. The rumble had some great, funny moments. Sheamus won. Happy? Ok, so you enjoyed the outcomes, but that speaks very little for the show itself. Daniel Bryan retained in a lousy match that went less than 10 minutes during which he got very little offense. CM Punk won in a good match that was tainted by a stupid overbooked finish. What were the funny moments in the Rumble? I must have missed them. So you enjoyed the finishes. If the Giants win the Superbowl, but it's the worst game ever, the game is a total blowout, botched plays everywhere, it's just a complete mess, would a Giants fan still say they enjoyed the game just because their team won? Of course not, they would say it was a terrible game, but they are glad their team won. Get over yourself you mark. People are ing allowed to like the show, who gives a crapif you didn't. Stop being a douchebag about it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 24, 2024 6:18:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2012 0:22:52 GMT -5
Ok, so you enjoyed the outcomes, but that speaks very little for the show itself. Daniel Bryan retained in a lousy match that went less than 10 minutes during which he got very little offense. CM Punk won in a good match that was tainted by a stupid overbooked finish. What were the funny moments in the Rumble? I must have missed them. So you enjoyed the finishes. If the Giants win the Superbowl, but it's the worst game ever, the game is a total blowout, botched plays everywhere, it's just a complete mess, would a Giants fan still say they enjoyed the game just because their team won? Of course not, they would say it was a terrible game, but they are glad their team won. Get over yourself you mark. People are ing allowed to like the show, who gives a poop if you didn't. Stop being a douchebag about it. Exactly what I was gonna say. I enjoyed it for what it was, I'm not saying it was a stellar 5 star classic pay per view of the entire galaxy but I enjoyed it.
|
|
|
Post by comintogetcha on Jan 30, 2012 0:23:20 GMT -5
Ok, so you enjoyed the outcomes, but that speaks very little for the show itself. Daniel Bryan retained in a lousy match that went less than 10 minutes during which he got very little offense. CM Punk won in a good match that was tainted by a stupid overbooked finish. What were the funny moments in the Rumble? I must have missed them. So you enjoyed the finishes. If the Giants win the Superbowl, but it's the worst game ever, the game is a total blowout, botched plays everywhere, it's just a complete mess, would a Giants fan still say they enjoyed the game just because their team won? Of course not, they would say it was a terrible game, but they are glad their team won. Get over yourself you mark. People are ing allowed to like the show, who gives a poop if you didn't. Stop being a douchebag about it. If you can't even come up with a reason as to why you enjoyed the show, then did you really enjoy it? If you liked that your favorites won, that's great, but that doesn't speak much for the show itself. Why should anyone care what you think if you can't back it up? If you liked it, then say why. So far I haven't heard much of anything besides people using ad hominem attacks towards myself due to their inability to accept the fact that this show sucked.
|
|