|
|
Post by The Undertaker on Jan 30, 2012 0:24:18 GMT -5
This was NOT the worst Rumble ever. Not even close.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 24, 2024 4:18:44 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2012 0:25:25 GMT -5
Get over yourself you mark. People are  ing allowed to like the show, who gives a poop if you didn't. Stop being a douchebag about it. If you can't even come up with a reason as to why you enjoyed the show, then did you really enjoy it? If you liked that your favorites won, that's great, but that doesn't speak much for the show itself. Why should anyone care what you think if you can't back it up? If you liked it, then say why. So far I haven't heard much of anything besides people using ad hominem attacks towards myself due to their inability to accept the fact that this show sucked. Nobody here has to explain to you why they liked the show. I mean, who are you exactly? God knows why I explained to you why I liked the show. I guess I just like to express my appreciation for a show. |
|
|
|
Post by King of Kings on Jan 30, 2012 0:25:29 GMT -5
MaxMoves, you've come off as a douche in other topics. Just shut the up, if other people enjoyed the show let them enjoy it. I ing loved it. The Rumble was full of surprises, I liked seeing Brodus, Cena VS Kane was great...just because you didn't like it doesn't mean everyone is supposed to hate it. |
|
|
|
Post by Calcifer Boheme on Jan 30, 2012 0:26:06 GMT -5
I want to add that I loved Hacksaw coming out. He was the first winner, so you have the history. Plus the pop was huge. I love how many people still react to him.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 24, 2024 4:18:44 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2012 0:26:36 GMT -5
Get over yourself you mark. People are ing allowed to like the show, who gives a poop if you didn't. Stop being a douchebag about it. If you can't even come up with a reason as to why you enjoyed the show, then did you really enjoy it? If you liked that your favorites won, that's great, but that doesn't speak much for the show itself. Why should anyone care what you think if you can't back it up? If you liked it, then say why. So far I haven't heard much of anything besides people using ad hominem attacks towards myself due to their inability to accept the fact that this show sucked. Who the are you that I should have to explain to you why I liked the show? |
|
|
|
Post by jake4698 on Jan 30, 2012 0:26:55 GMT -5
Sorry but I think that this Rumble was pretty good (even, of the bests ever) but I would say only the Battle Royal, not the PPV as whole. Kharma, Hacksaw, Road Dogg, Booker T, Mick Foley, Jerry Lawler & that crap of Michael Cole, we didn't need them (obviously, me). Okay. But I think that Sheamus deserves to win it. He's been in the WWE, for like almost 4 years, but he didn't got pushed enough (I mean, besides his first WWE title win/feud with Cena). I think that he's very tallented, but WWE's bookers doesn't know how to manage McMahon's Company's roster.. Unfortunatly  But yeah, as he won the RR, it's promising lots of things (hopefully)! |
|
|
|
Post by MacReady on Jan 30, 2012 0:28:13 GMT -5
Get over yourself you mark. People are ing allowed to like the show, who gives a poop if you didn't. Stop being a douchebag about it. If you can't even come up with a reason as to why you enjoyed the show, then did you really enjoy it? If you liked that your favorites won, that's great, but that doesn't speak much for the show itself. Why should anyone care what you think if you can't back it up? If you liked it, then say why. So far I haven't heard much of anything besides people using ad hominem attacks towards myself due to their inability to accept the fact that this show sucked. STEEN gave you reasons why he liked it, aside from his favorites winning, which included him finding moments in the Rumble funny, and like a douchebag you replied "OH I MUST'VE MISSED THE FUNNY MOMENTS". So basically, what you're driving at is, if it doesn't fall in to the confines of what YOU define as good, it isn't good. Who the cares what you think is good? If somebody enjoys it, than they enjoy it. It's pretty goddamn simple. Who are you? What made you the authority on what constitutes a good PPV? Take your negative opinion somewhere else, because all you're doing is instigating fights. |
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Jan 30, 2012 0:28:39 GMT -5
This year's Royal Rumble delivered. I don't care that Sheamus won, but it was a nice surprise.
|
|
|
|
Post by comintogetcha on Jan 30, 2012 0:29:03 GMT -5
If you enjoyed the show, then why can't you explain what you enjoyed about it? No one says you HAVE to, but the fact that no one is, and in fact is getting defensive and argumentative about it leads me to believe that you either didn't really enjoy the show, or don't know why you enjoyed it, and if you don't know, you should probably ask yourself whether or not you actually did. I presented my argument as to why this show sucked, and all you people do is attack me claiming that I'm always negative and blah blah blah, but no one can articulate a counter argument. Give it up, the show sucked, you all know it sucked, and you won't even admit that it sucked.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vitamin Z on Jan 30, 2012 0:29:10 GMT -5
Rodriguez, Kharma, great title matches.
Yeah. This was an awesome PPV.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 24, 2024 4:18:44 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2012 0:30:48 GMT -5
If you enjoyed the show, then why can't you explain what you enjoyed about it? No one says you HAVE to, but the fact that no one is, and in fact is getting defensive and argumentative about it leads me to believe that you either didn't really enjoy the show, or don't know why you enjoyed it, and if you don't know, you should probably ask yourself whether or not you actually did. I presented my argument as to why this show sucked, and all you people do is attack me claiming that I'm always negative and blah blah blah, but no one can articulate a counter argument. Give it up, the show sucked, you all know it sucked, and you won't even admit that it sucked. What is it like your gimmick to type paragraphs of complete and utter bullpoop? |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 24, 2024 4:18:44 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2012 0:31:08 GMT -5
If you enjoyed the show, then why can't you explain what you enjoyed about it? No one says you HAVE to, but the fact that no one is, and in fact is getting defensive and argumentative about it leads me to believe that you either didn't really enjoy the show, or don't know why you enjoyed it, and if you don't know, you should probably ask yourself whether or not you actually did. I presented my argument as to why this show sucked, and all you people do is attack me claiming that I'm always negative and blah blah blah, but no one can articulate a counter argument. Give it up, the show sucked, you all know it sucked, and you won't even admit that it sucked. Jesus, are you seriously that ing dense? So because you didn't like the show, we should explain ourselves to you? Why don't you explain why it was such a bad show since you're obviously the all knowing god of what makes a good pay per view.... |
|
|
|
Post by comintogetcha on Jan 30, 2012 0:31:12 GMT -5
If you can't even come up with a reason as to why you enjoyed the show, then did you really enjoy it? If you liked that your favorites won, that's great, but that doesn't speak much for the show itself. Why should anyone care what you think if you can't back it up? If you liked it, then say why. So far I haven't heard much of anything besides people using ad hominem attacks towards myself due to their inability to accept the fact that this show sucked. STEEN gave you reasons why he liked it, aside from his favorites winning, which included him finding moments in the Rumble funny, and like a douchebag you replied "OH I MUST'VE MISSED THE FUNNY MOMENTS". So basically, what you're driving at is, if it doesn't fall in to the confines of what YOU define as good, it isn't good. Who the cares what you think is good? If somebody enjoys it, than they enjoy it. It's pretty goddamn simple. Who are you? What made you the authority on what constitutes a good PPV? Take your negative opinion somewhere else, because all you're doing is instigating fights. No one made me the authority, and I'm not claiming to be an authority. Steen didn't give me any real reasons at all, I tore them all to shreds, and he didn't have any counter argument. |
|
MikeMillenium
Main Eventer
I LOVE THE WWE AND EVERYTHING ABOUT IT
Joined on: Jul 21, 2010 13:45:54 GMT -5
Posts: 1,622
|
Post by MikeMillenium on Jan 30, 2012 0:31:22 GMT -5
I actually liked Cole being in it, I thought it was pretty funny and cool to have al three announcers compete. At least they are doing new things every year. I mean, Kofi beat John Morrison for amazing Rumble moment.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 24, 2024 4:18:44 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2012 0:32:49 GMT -5
I don't care if someone enjoys something, but give a reason as to why you enjoyed it. What was enjoyable about it? I have yet to read any legitimate reasons as to why people liked this show. I laid out my argument, now lay out yours. I enjoyed it because I don't sit there and over analyze it. I used to be like you hating on everything the WWE did, but then I realized I was being a dumbass. I mean sure the star power in the Rumble wasn't there but it was pretty enjoyable for what it was. Socko vs. Cobra had me laughing my ass off. I marked the hell out for Kharma and Road Dogg and Jericho and Sheamus had a great final few minutes at the end of the Rumble. I was also surprised by Sheamus winning which made it all the better. I laughed my ass off, marked out, saw great back and forth action and was surprised by the winner. Honestly to me that's what the Royal Rumble is all about. Yep, here's my explanation. |
|
|
|
Post by comintogetcha on Jan 30, 2012 0:32:55 GMT -5
If you enjoyed the show, then why can't you explain what you enjoyed about it? No one says you HAVE to, but the fact that no one is, and in fact is getting defensive and argumentative about it leads me to believe that you either didn't really enjoy the show, or don't know why you enjoyed it, and if you don't know, you should probably ask yourself whether or not you actually did. I presented my argument as to why this show sucked, and all you people do is attack me claiming that I'm always negative and blah blah blah, but no one can articulate a counter argument. Give it up, the show sucked, you all know it sucked, and you won't even admit that it sucked. Jesus, are you seriously that ing dense? So because you didn't like the show, we should explain ourselves to you? Why don't you explain why it was such a bad show since you're obviously the all knowing god of what makes a good pay per view.... I DID EXPLAIN WHY IT WAS A BAD SHOW! Christ, can you people read? You clearly can't articulate a decent argument, so maybe I should question your literacy. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 24, 2024 4:18:44 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2012 0:33:02 GMT -5
STEEN gave you reasons why he liked it, aside from his favorites winning, which included him finding moments in the Rumble funny, and like a douchebag you replied "OH I MUST'VE MISSED THE FUNNY MOMENTS". So basically, what you're driving at is, if it doesn't fall in to the confines of what YOU define as good, it isn't good. Who the cares what you think is good? If somebody enjoys it, than they enjoy it. It's pretty goddamn simple. Who are you? What made you the authority on what constitutes a good PPV? Take your negative opinion somewhere else, because all you're doing is instigating fights. No one made me the authority, and I'm not claiming to be an authority. Steen didn't give me any real reasons at all, I tore them all to shreds, and he didn't have any counter argument. So Punk winning, Bryan winning, Me enjoying the rumble and thinking it had some great moments, isn't reasons? off. |
|
|
|
Post by MacReady on Jan 30, 2012 0:33:15 GMT -5
STEEN gave you reasons why he liked it, aside from his favorites winning, which included him finding moments in the Rumble funny, and like a douchebag you replied "OH I MUST'VE MISSED THE FUNNY MOMENTS". So basically, what you're driving at is, if it doesn't fall in to the confines of what YOU define as good, it isn't good. Who the cares what you think is good? If somebody enjoys it, than they enjoy it. It's pretty goddamn simple. Who are you? What made you the authority on what constitutes a good PPV? Take your negative opinion somewhere else, because all you're doing is instigating fights. No one made me the authority, and I'm not claiming to be an authority. Steen didn't give me any real reasons at all, I tore them all to shreds, and he didn't have any counter argument. That's my point, who the are you to "tear them to shreds"? It's HIS reasons, HIS opinion, you can't tear that to shreds, he enjoyed it for those reasons, that's all that ing matters. Go the away. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 24, 2024 4:18:44 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2012 0:33:38 GMT -5
If you enjoyed the show, then why can't you explain what you enjoyed about it? No one says you HAVE to, but the fact that no one is, and in fact is getting defensive and argumentative about it leads me to believe that you either didn't really enjoy the show, or don't know why you enjoyed it, and if you don't know, you should probably ask yourself whether or not you actually did. I presented my argument as to why this show sucked, and all you people do is attack me claiming that I'm always negative and blah blah blah, but no one can articulate a counter argument. Give it up, the show sucked, you all know it sucked, and you won't even admit that it sucked. If we say it sucked, even though it didn't, will you go away? |
|
|
|
Post by comintogetcha on Jan 30, 2012 0:38:19 GMT -5
No one made me the authority, and I'm not claiming to be an authority. Steen didn't give me any real reasons at all, I tore them all to shreds, and he didn't have any counter argument. So Punk winning, Bryan winning, Me enjoying the rumble and thinking it had some great moments, isn't reasons? off. I explained it with my football analogy. Just because your favorites won doesn't mean it was a good show, it just means that your favorite guys won. What were the great moments? Two guys fighting with socks? A couple of guys making their return that didn't actually do anything? |
|
