|
|
Post by S on Feb 14, 2012 20:05:04 GMT -5
I mean, i dunno, i think it could be something that has been planned for ages, especially if it is to be Takers last match, i just think that Taker collapsing at last years event, arguably shaving his head months ago and other instances could have been a lead up to a big plan... then again, WWE could have weaved this storyline between all those random occurances.
|
|
|
|
Post by IRS on Feb 14, 2012 20:08:34 GMT -5
Yes I knew the moment Taker was carried out there would be a rematch.
|
|
|
|
Post by ASR (therockisback) on Feb 14, 2012 20:18:33 GMT -5
Yes I knew the moment Taker was carried out there would be a rematch. The night after WM was also a dead giveaway even though most people thought this match wasn't going to happen and it turns out it actually is . I actually wanted the rematch to happen but then i thought it would be pointless but now it looks like it will top last years match. |
|
|
|
Post by IRS on Feb 14, 2012 20:22:59 GMT -5
Yes I knew the moment Taker was carried out there would be a rematch. The night after WM was also a dead giveaway even though most people thought this match wasn't going to happen and it turns out it actually is . I actually wanted the rematch to happen but then i thought it would be pointless but now it looks like it will top last years match. Yes it seems it will be good if Taker's shoulder and knees hold up. |
|
Raider
Superstar
" . . . "
Joined on: Jan 17, 2012 17:05:37 GMT -5
Posts: 884
|
Post by Raider on Feb 14, 2012 20:23:36 GMT -5
I don't think they had all the details laid out like Undertaker cutting his hair, they just now tied that in, but it was evident they planned for this match to happen after WM last year when Triple H came out and said Taker when you are healed, come and find me.
Although WWE does drop storylines all the time so if they decided to go in a different direction then they easily could pretend like that never happened like they have done in the past.
|
|
Mr. K.O
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 24, 2010 19:04:14 GMT -5
Posts: 4,094
|
Post by Mr. K.O on Feb 14, 2012 20:43:53 GMT -5
I think they had planned for the match to happen this year since last year but didn't have the storyline set until around this time.
|
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Feb 14, 2012 20:54:35 GMT -5
Their match last year was terrible so I hope they do better this time round.
But yeah, definitely planned.
|
|
|
|
Post by orton1994 on Feb 14, 2012 20:58:54 GMT -5
Their match last year was terrible so I hope they do better this time round. But yeah, definitely planned. You can't really say it was terrible..sure it wasn't a good "wrestling" match but it was really exciting |
|
|
|
Post by ztj_wwf on Feb 14, 2012 21:12:14 GMT -5
How anyone can say the match was bad, let alone "terrible" confuses me greatly. It's in my top 10 of all time...
|
|
|
|
Post by AlexWestCollects on Feb 15, 2012 1:41:57 GMT -5
yea i think they def planned it last yr
|
|
|
|
Post by Jaz on Feb 15, 2012 1:53:54 GMT -5
I think they planned it, but I don't think they planned the hair thing. If they would have planned that, they wouldn't have had Taker come out with a wig last week. They would have just had him cut his hair after Raw.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 13:19:49 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2012 5:58:26 GMT -5
How anyone can say the match was bad, let alone "terrible" confuses me greatly. It's in my top 10 of all time... while its not in my top 10 I agree-it was far from terrible. |
|
|
|
Post by Word™ on Feb 15, 2012 6:29:15 GMT -5
That match being a top 10 of all time is not right on many levels.
But on topic. WWE doesn't plan this extensively for a story a year in advance.. I don't think anyways.
|
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Feb 15, 2012 10:20:03 GMT -5
Their match wasn't any good last year imo. I don't want to see it, and it appears ratings wise, that the audience doesn't care about it either so far based on the abysmal rating that segment drew on Monday. Which is a shame because I thought Hunter and HBK were fantastic with what they did. Triple H said, I know they, the audience, don't want to see me beat him, and that to me is true. Which is great, except for he is going to beat him.
To the point though, I think in retrospect, that WWE had it mapped out all long. I was just hoping it wasn't true and they would go with something else.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cammi Oh on Feb 15, 2012 11:41:49 GMT -5
My thought is no. I think HHH was the best thing out of no options for this year.
|
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Feb 15, 2012 13:12:01 GMT -5
How anyone can say the match was bad, let alone "terrible" confuses me greatly. It's in my top 10 of all time... Agreed! I loved it! |
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Feb 15, 2012 13:28:45 GMT -5
I believe the night after Wrestlemania last year Triple H came out and told Undertaker that if he ever decided to come back, that "I'll be waiting".
It's different than the story that Triple H is telling now about how he felt sorry for Undertaker and "doesn't want to be that guy" to end him...but he also didn't become "COO" until over the summer, so perhaps that changed his character's perspective on the business, Undertaker, and the streak.
But I think they obviously knew it was going to happen again this year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Feb 15, 2012 16:50:55 GMT -5
It really seems that way.
|
|
|
|
Post by skribbel24 on Feb 15, 2012 17:01:31 GMT -5
My thought is no. I think HHH was the best thing out of no options for this year. My thoughts are these. |
|
|
|
Post by ToastMaster General on Feb 15, 2012 19:52:48 GMT -5
From what I understand, Taker-HHH was supposed to happen at SummerSlam along with Rock-Cena, then Cena would take on Taker at WM. Then they dropped it the DAY AFTER WM 27 and went along with Rock-Cena for WM 28.
|
|
