|
Post by LtD73 on May 14, 2012 11:18:27 GMT -5
F4Wonline.com is reporting WWE creative is "in a panic" regarding the Triple H/Brock Lesnar story.
There has been some consideration to have the match between the two at No Way Out in June. Some in WWE feel though that would be a huge mistake and this is a big match which has to be saved for SummerSlam.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Lesnar/HHH at Summerslam unless they can get The Rock for Summerslam, because it's a huge match.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 21:18:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2012 11:20:44 GMT -5
I think they should stretch it out to Summerslam if they can, and then have Brock/Rock at Survivor Series, and Brock/WWE Champ at WM29?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 21:18:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2012 11:35:48 GMT -5
That would work, then have Brock vs Champ at Summerlsm, Brock vs Rock at SS, then Rock vs Cena at WM29. And Brock vs Taker at Mania.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on May 14, 2012 11:55:42 GMT -5
Shouldn't waste it IMO, could draw big buys for Summerslam. But I guess they will look at it in the way that Summerslam will draw big buys anyway so by having it at No Way Out then they get two for the price of one.
I think they should save it though, and go with Triple H vs Brock Lesnar at Summerslam, Brock Lesnar vs CM Punk for the WWE Championship at Survivor Series, have The Rock win the Royal Rumble then Brock Lesnar vs The Rock for the WWE Championship at Wrestlemania 29, along with John Cena vs Undertaker.
|
|
|
Post by K5 on May 14, 2012 12:06:13 GMT -5
yep, should be the summerslam match...although i'm not THAT hyped over it. too bad they didn't develop rock/brock, that would've been perfect. had brock F5 rock instead of cena that night.
|
|
|
Post by kazoosandstreamers on May 14, 2012 12:06:58 GMT -5
Why are they in panic? lol
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on May 14, 2012 12:09:53 GMT -5
Why are they in panic? lol To rush the storyline i suppose
|
|
|
Post by v/\v on May 14, 2012 12:12:52 GMT -5
This will not do much business for SummerSlam. Maybe in 2003. It isn't attractive to the outside. It will be so bad watching everything tread water until this match because it will be hogging the main spotlight, (outside of Cena vs John Laurinaitis - oh what circle of hell is this good for business), whilst everything else(WWE CHAMP CM PUNK) gets swept under the rug. If you have no Rock, Punk should be the guy facing Brock at Summerslam for the belt not Triple H. That is what would do big business in 2012. Therefore if it can't happen at Over The Limit and I think that is wise as it's close now, NWO has to be the night it happens. I love Game but seriously COO HHH bores the piss out of me with his promos that go on for ingever, I couldn't take three months of it. If they stick to H/Brock at SSlam, everything will be in slow-motion for months.
|
|
MattelsRule
Main Eventer
JakksRule is dead! Long live MattelsRule!
Joined on: Mar 18, 2005 2:03:07 GMT -5
Posts: 2,468
|
Post by MattelsRule on May 14, 2012 12:45:24 GMT -5
This will not do much business for SummerSlam. Maybe in 2003. It isn't attractive to the outside. It will be so bad watching everything tread water until this match because it will be hogging the main spotlight, (outside of Cena vs John Laurinaitis - oh what circle of hell is this good for business), whilst everything else(WWE CHAMP CM PUNK) gets swept under the rug. If you have no Rock, Punk should be the guy facing Brock at Summerslam for the belt not Triple H. That is what would do big business in 2012. Therefore if it can't happen at Over The Limit and I think that is wise as it's close now, NWO has to be the night it happens. I love Game but seriously COO HHH bores the piss out of me with his promos that go on for ingever, I couldn't take three months of it. If they stick to H/Brock at SSlam, everything will be in slow-motion for months. Makes a good point here. Maybe it is best to push HHH/Lesnar forward to get buys for a PPV that typically doesnt do too well. Punk vs Brock could be a great Summerslam main event.
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on May 14, 2012 12:52:48 GMT -5
I still think if Punk vs Brock happens that Brock is going to walk away the winner, which doesn't sit well with me. However, with Heyman in the mix now, am 100% willing to see Brock vs Punk just because of the back-and-fourth that will go on between two of the most charismatic mic guys in the history of wrestling imo. Heyman vs Punk with Brock to draw the buys would be gold for SummerSlam.
I'll honestly take Triple H vs Brock whenever they are ready to give it to us.
|
|
|
Post by ASR (therockisback) on May 14, 2012 13:56:23 GMT -5
Lesnar vs HHH at SummerSlam, Lesnar vs Orton at NOC, Lesnar vs Orton at NOC, Lesnar vs Punk at SS, Lesnar vs Jericho at Royal Rumble, Lesnar vs Cena II at EC, Lesnar vs Taker at WM29 which also features Rock vs Cena II. Lesnar's contract ends and we don't see Lesnar until WM30 where we get Brock vs Rock II & Taker vs Cena.
Having Taker vs Cena at WM29 would be a mistake and having Rock/Brock II should be saved for WM30 since its two of the biggest names who left WWE at a young age and both returned at young ages who are big draws in and out of the WWE going at it at the biggest WM to date which is the 30th edition which should also feature Taker vs Cena. Having these matches at WM29 would be a mistake since at WM30 it would probably be Rock vs Cena II & Brock vs Taker which doesn't look as good as the 1st option.
As far as Lesnar vs HHH goes, Have the match take place at SummerSlam and if not then have it take place at NWO or MITB and have Lesnar take on Orton at SummerSlam.
|
|
elbowdrops
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Apr 13, 2012 17:23:15 GMT -5
Posts: 320
|
Post by elbowdrops on May 14, 2012 14:02:53 GMT -5
I hope so for my sake I'm going to No Way Out!
|
|
|
Post by J12 on May 14, 2012 14:11:01 GMT -5
I'm not necessarily opposed to having it at either event.
I agree with the idea of it being at Summerslam because of the size of the match, but from a business standpoint, it also makes sense to do it in June, when the buyrate for No Way Out would be presumably low otherwise.
A lot of people will buy Summerslam regardless of the card because it's one of the biggest shows of the year. It's hard to convince those people to drop $50+ on an "In Your House" show without a really powerful match to back it up.
|
|
|
Post by Phantom on May 14, 2012 14:17:28 GMT -5
The sooner the better. I want Lesnar vs. Punk at Summerslam. Maybe even The Rock if hes ready.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on May 14, 2012 15:09:55 GMT -5
I'd save it for Summer Slam. It has that big match feel to it, so I say save it for one of the "Big Four".
|
|
|
Post by el torro on May 14, 2012 16:13:41 GMT -5
I'd rather not have them or the Rock compete. I'm sick of wrestlers coming back and all ready main-eventing PPV's. Instead of having guys like Ziggler, Cody, Wade, etc. start main eventing, they have Brock, Rock, Albert and whoever hogging all the spotlight. Even the damn WWE Championship and WHC fueds are being over looked. They wanted to leave, so why should they just get special treatment their first night back?
|
|
|
Post by comintogetcha on May 14, 2012 16:16:27 GMT -5
The fact that the buyrate for Survivor Series last year was still in the toilet, despite it being the in ring return of The Rock, shows that big names should not be wasted on B-Shows. Why waste Lesnar's next match on a crap show no one will probably order anyway. Save him for Summerslam.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 21:18:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2012 16:18:21 GMT -5
I'd rather not have them or the Rock compete. I'm sick of wrestlers coming back and all ready main-eventing PPV's. Instead of having guys like Ziggler, Cody, Wade, etc. start main eventing, they have Brock, Rock, Albert and whoever hogging all the spotlight. Even the damn WWE Championship and WHC fueds are being over looked. They wanted to leave, so why should they just get special treatment their first night back? I get where you are coming from, but it doesn't matter how you look at it, people would rather see Brock, Rock, Undertaker etc than guys like Ziggler, Barrett (who wouldn't) and Cody. More people will watch because of guys like Rock and Brock, so it's getting the undercard more exposure anyway.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on May 14, 2012 16:54:24 GMT -5
The fact that the buyrate for Survivor Series last year was still in the toilet, despite it being the in ring return of The Rock, shows that big names should not be wasted on B-Shows. Why waste Lesnar's next match on a crap show no one will probably order anyway. Save him for Summerslam. Survivor Series is a B-show?
|
|
mrdoombringer
Superstar
Joined on: Jun 11, 2011 12:45:51 GMT -5
Posts: 668
|
Post by mrdoombringer on May 15, 2012 0:30:48 GMT -5
nwo brock vs triple summerslam brock vs punk noc rematch from summerslam brock takes break til survivor series time ss brock vs orton tlc no appearance rumble surprise entrant with the rock also making surprise entry brock eliminates rock and hurts him for a few weeks live via satellite rocky delivers promos on brocky nothing at ec wm 29 brock vs rock
|
|