|
Post by WWFAttitudeEraFan on Jun 18, 2012 22:00:42 GMT -5
I went with other, which I intend to mean none. Kane is at a stage in his career where he shouldn't be holding Championships. It serves no purpose for him, and does no favors for anybody else, much like The Undertaker. He's old, he should be used to put younger guys over when they really need that big push. He shouldn't be winning titles. So basically Jericho shouldn't get another WHC run either since "he's old" as well right? . he's almost 42 so he should be used only to push the younger guys and nothing else! . For real though Kane (and Jericho as i was only using him strictly as an example) can still go and are still entertaining as hell. nothing wrong with him (or Jericho) getting another WHC run. Hell Taker was the champion back in 2007 and early 2008 if i'm not mistaken. he was 42-43 around that time. Flair and Hogan held the WHC's well into their late 40's and even 50's, and no one complained about that. yeah... i think Kane should still get another WHC before he retires .
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jun 18, 2012 22:25:21 GMT -5
I went with other, which I intend to mean none. Kane is at a stage in his career where he shouldn't be holding Championships. It serves no purpose for him, and does no favors for anybody else, much like The Undertaker. He's old, he should be used to put younger guys over when they really need that big push. He shouldn't be winning titles. So basically Jericho shouldn't get another WHC run either since "he's old" as well right? . he's almost 42 so he should be used only to push the younger guys and nothing else! . For real though Kane (and Jericho as i was only using him strictly as an example) can still go and are still entertaining as hell. nothing wrong with him (or Jericho) getting another WHC run. Hell Taker was the champion back in 2007 and early 2008 if i'm not mistaken. he was 42-43 around that time. Flair and Hogan held the WHC's well into their late 40's and even 50's, and no one complained about that. yeah... i think Kane should still get another WHC before he retires . Honestly, I'm sure that's the way Jericho would want it. As evidenced by his recent run, Jericho has little interest in winning. Regardless, Jericho has far more to give (and gain) than Kane does at this stage of his career. I honestly don't think Kane has done much worth noting in nearly a decade. So, as a result, I can't justify another World Title run.
|
|
|
Post by Scotty on Jun 18, 2012 22:30:55 GMT -5
None, this point in his career he doesn't need a title. Also what WCW rumors?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 8:39:34 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2012 0:44:29 GMT -5
FCW Title.
|
|
|
Post by Jaz on Jun 19, 2012 0:52:40 GMT -5
I vote none. I'd be okay with them giving Kane a brief title reign before he retires, but other then that, I don't really care for him. His feud with Bryan and Punk was just stupid.
|
|
|
Post by Phantom on Jun 19, 2012 0:53:42 GMT -5
Give him the US Title and then have him drop it to Ryder.
|
|
|
Post by Richikane on Jun 19, 2012 3:11:10 GMT -5
predetermined? its still real to me darnit.
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Jun 19, 2012 9:19:30 GMT -5
Either the United States Championship (just because he's never held it) or take the World Heavyweight Championship off of that turd Sheamus.
|
|