Daniel F'n Bryan
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 24, 2011 0:33:48 GMT -5
Posts: 2,929
|
Post by Daniel F'n Bryan on Jul 6, 2012 5:07:19 GMT -5
I'm watching the new EC Unreleased Vol. 1 DVD and I cant help but notice the INCREDIBLE difference in the look between these two matches
RVD&Sabu vs. The Eliminators- February 1997 Taz vs. Sabu- Barely Legal April 1997 Now I know that this was their first PPV but this quality was pretty consistent for a while after the PPV. But in such a short period of the time the quality and look of the shows is DRAMATICALLY improved. These are the differences that I've noticed:
MUCH nicer and more professional looking ring. Added lights and fog machines in the entrance Lighting rig above ring that gave much better lighting MUCH better sound and camera quality
I'm sure there are others but by simply watching these two matches you will see what I'm talking about. So what I'm wondering is how much did Vince help out ECW at this time? I mean there's no way that ECW alone with there limited resources was able to make all these improvements in such a short time. So if anybody can shed some light on this please do so.
|
|
threehgame
Main Eventer
Beyond Bored By You and Your Wrestling
Joined on: Sept 22, 2008 19:09:45 GMT -5
Posts: 2,399
|
Post by threehgame on Jul 6, 2012 5:22:50 GMT -5
The WWE made book and documentary claims Vince dumped lots of money into ECW and allowed them to stay afloat while WCW was trying to buy all their talent. In the indipenent book it says Vince gave them money but not as much as WWE now claims and he did it to scout talent and block WCW from getting a direct line to ECW talent.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 19, 2024 1:37:49 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2012 6:12:38 GMT -5
The WWE made book and documentary claims Vince dumped lots of money into ECW and allowed them to stay afloat while WCW was trying to buy all their talent. In the indipenent book it says Vince gave them money but not as much as WWE now claims and he did it to scout talent and block WCW from getting a direct line to ECW talent. sounds about right to me.......Vince had his eye on loads of their talent and wasnt really being as benevolent as WWE makes him out to be.
|
|
|
Post by jammer311 on Jul 6, 2012 8:32:49 GMT -5
Knowing that Vince gave the original ECW money to stay a float makes you wonder why when he started up the new ECW that he didn't make it like the original.
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Jul 6, 2012 9:37:18 GMT -5
Knowing that Vince gave the original ECW money to stay a float makes you wonder why when he started up the new ECW that he didn't make it like the original. i don't follow. he essentially did try to do that and just failed because they over-commercialized it, which obviously the wwe would do with anything.
|
|
|
Post by jammer311 on Jul 6, 2012 9:43:23 GMT -5
Knowing that Vince gave the original ECW money to stay a float makes you wonder why when he started up the new ECW that he didn't make it like the original. i don't follow. he essentially did try to do that and just failed because they over-commercialized it, which obviously the wwe would do with anything. He didn't try to make it at all like the original ECW. You could tell watching the first episode of it. He shot the ECW shows in giant arena's and usually before or after Smackdown had taken place. There was nothing about the new ECW that was anything like the original. The only WWE produced ECW show that had any sort of realism to it of what the original ECW was like, was One Night Stand 2005.
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Jul 6, 2012 10:42:13 GMT -5
Vince McMahon, for all the crap people give him, was not a bad guy to ECW back in the day. He gave ECW a lot of money, he allowed WWF wrestlers to appear on ECW shows, he allowed ECW wrestlers to appear on WWF shows....
I mean, Vince McMahon dedicated an ENTIRE EPISODE of Monday Night RAW to matches of ECW wrestlers.
WWF didn't put ECW out of business....ECW's money troubles put ECW out of business. Vince McMahon could only do so much to try and help and when Paul Heyman was going out of business you can't expect Vince to swoop in and save the whole thing, but he did as much as he could.
And then even after ECW went out of business at one point or another Vince gave essentially every ex-ECW wrestler a job for at least a little while.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 19, 2024 1:37:49 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2012 11:24:50 GMT -5
I don't know if Vince or Heyman would ever OPENLY admit it but...
Vince was basically helping ECW out and keeping them on the payroll so he could use it as his own personal developmental territory for WWE.
Just like USWA and OVW.
|
|
jakksking1
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 2, 2011 14:45:41 GMT -5
Posts: 2,843
|
Post by jakksking1 on Jul 6, 2012 12:41:42 GMT -5
I don't know if Vince or Heyman would ever OPENLY admit it but... Vince was basically helping ECW out and keeping them on the payroll so he could use it as his own personal developmental territory for WWE. Just like USWA and OVW. Exactly right. It was clearly a business decision, Vince wasn't trying to be benevolent. Ever since he took the helm in the 80s, he was basically on a search and destroy mission, buying up everything he could. He got a nice influx of talent from ECW in the coming years. I also think Vince was going to try and copy the NWO storyline and do an invasion in 1997. The exposure Vince gave the wrestlers and the seed money he gave to Heyman would have been a nice investment if it ever panned out. I think Vince recognized early on, however, that no matter how much money he gave ECW, it would never have been a threat to him, as the sponsors and networks never would've backed a product as violent as ECW.
|
|
|
Post by Nivro™ on Jul 6, 2012 17:51:21 GMT -5
I was always confused at how WWF was apparently putting money into the company....yet Heyman was going broke and couldnt pay his wrestlers. If you're basically getting "free money" why cant you pay your bills?
|
|
|
Post by Lewscher on Jul 6, 2012 19:32:46 GMT -5
I was always confused at how WWF was apparently putting money into the company.... yet Heyman was going broke and couldnt pay his wrestlers. If you're basically getting "free money" why cant you pay your bills? Its been said by raven, sandman, new jack and others that drugs were heavily in use, and heyman told sandman to get come coke when he was on acid . . . . yeah, money went somewhere! this video also sums up alot, all be it vince did finance ecw, he ruined pro wrestling and wcw/ecw, sure they went out of buisness from their own troubles with cable networks and such, but its a damn shame vince just consumed them along with every other organisation
|
|
|
Post by DTP. on Jul 6, 2012 23:12:09 GMT -5
I'm wondering about the sum that the WWF put into ECW. Because WWF were also financially unsafe in 1997.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 19, 2024 1:37:49 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2012 2:10:27 GMT -5
i don't follow. he essentially did try to do that and just failed because they over-commercialized it, which obviously the wwe would do with anything. He didn't try to make it at all like the original ECW. You could tell watching the first episode of it. He shot the ECW shows in giant arena's and usually before or after Smackdown had taken place. There was nothing about the new ECW that was anything like the original. The only WWE produced ECW show that had any sort of realism to it of what the original ECW was like, was One Night Stand 2005. What was ECW in 1997? A place for young guys to get their start and become discovered, and place for older wrestlers to become reborn. What was ECW 2008? A place for young guys to get their start and be discovered (Punk, Sheamus Swagger) and a place for older wrestlers to get reborn (Mark Henry, Christian, Chavo) It's pretty much the same. You had your occasional hardcore match, and you also had a lot of good wrestling. Also in what universe is a man going to finically support a competing business just to be "benevolent"? I'm pretty sure he's mentioned that he did it get talent. ECW didn't get exactly screwed over here either, for one as mentioned by Lorenzo Alcazar, ECW had a ton of promotion for their brand, and PPV's from the WWE, as well has having WWE wrestlers work form them which in turned only helped guys like Droz and Al Snow in the long run. Also keep in mind the number of guys that would leave for WCW regardless. At least WWE paid for the right to get those talents. In the end this decision was a win-win for both promoters as well as the wrestlers. I'm not sure why you guys would even bother to spin it any other way..
|
|
Daniel F'n Bryan
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 24, 2011 0:33:48 GMT -5
Posts: 2,929
|
Post by Daniel F'n Bryan on Jul 7, 2012 2:24:20 GMT -5
He didn't try to make it at all like the original ECW. You could tell watching the first episode of it. He shot the ECW shows in giant arena's and usually before or after Smackdown had taken place. There was nothing about the new ECW that was anything like the original. The only WWE produced ECW show that had any sort of realism to it of what the original ECW was like, was One Night Stand 2005. What was ECW in 1997? A place for young guys to get their start and become discovered, and place for older wrestlers to become reborn. What was ECW 2008? A place for young guys to get their start and be discovered (Punk, Sheamus Swagger) and a place for older wrestlers to get reborn (Mark Henry, Christian, Chavo) Thats completely besides the point. The product is COMPLETELY different in every aspect and not in a good way.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 19, 2024 1:37:49 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2012 2:47:53 GMT -5
What was ECW in 1997? A place for young guys to get their start and become discovered, and place for older wrestlers to become reborn. What was ECW 2008? A place for young guys to get their start and be discovered (Punk, Sheamus Swagger) and a place for older wrestlers to get reborn (Mark Henry, Christian, Chavo) Thats completely besides the point. The product is COMPLETELY different in every aspect and not in a good way. how so?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 19, 2024 1:37:49 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2012 6:45:30 GMT -5
Thats completely besides the point. The product is COMPLETELY different in every aspect and not in a good way. how so? your asking how the product of the original ECW was different to Vinnies ECW? swearing/lude behaviour genuinely Dangerous matches like Barb wire etc Blood and I mean hardway juice jobs excellent tag team bouts within a killer division stars having entrance tunes from top bands to name but a few.
|
|
500DaysofNight
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 30, 2001 10:19:35 GMT -5
Posts: 4,639
|
Post by 500DaysofNight on Jul 8, 2012 10:17:54 GMT -5
I think the new ECW would've stuck much closer to the original product had RVD not been busted for pot after they had JUST given him the world title to both shows. Apparently Vince did have some faith in it, but RVD totally killed all of that. But I think it was destined to fail from the get go. So much bad luck was brought upon the brand. Like RVD getting busted, which I already mentioned, Kurt Angle getting let go and then Benoit doing what he did.
Just think... if that brand would've stayed strong and had RVD, Angle, Benoit and Punk all at once.
But to go back to the original question, Vince must've REALLY loved the company. He gave them their own PPV and then brought the brand back and rehired at least 15 or 20 guys. He must've gave them some serious cash back in the day.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 19, 2024 1:37:49 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2012 15:19:46 GMT -5
the sales of the Rise & Fall of ECW DVD is what respiked his interest in the brand......it was a great move too.the segment with Vinnie,Bischoff and Heyman prior to ONS2005 was pure GOLD IMO
|
|
|
Post by drifter on Jul 10, 2012 13:03:27 GMT -5
I think the new ECW would've stuck much closer to the original product had RVD not been busted for pot after they had JUST given him the world title to both shows. Apparently Vince did have some faith in it, but RVD totally killed all of that. But I think it was destined to fail from the get go. So much bad luck was brought upon the brand. Like RVD getting busted, which I already mentioned, Kurt Angle getting let go and then Benoit doing what he did. Just think... if that brand would've stayed strong and had RVD, Angle, Benoit and Punk all at once. But to go back to the original question, Vince must've REALLY loved the company. He gave them their own PPV and then brought the brand back and rehired at least 15 or 20 guys. He must've gave them some serious cash back in the day.I don't think it was so much that he loved ECW, it was that he loved the idea that he could still make money off of the ECW name, several years after they were shut down. And even without those talent you mentioned, the ECW brand would have had a better chance, if Heyman was given more control, when he was part of the creative process. Remember, for the ECW Elimination Chamber, he wanted to have Big Show eliminated first and early by CM Punk via tap out, to help give a big rub to Punk's character, but he was shot down, and they went with Show and Lashley to finish it out.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 19, 2024 1:37:49 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2012 9:57:38 GMT -5
Stephanie "the genius" Mcmahon was such an enemy of Heymans that WWECW was NEVER gonna succeed or be the way he wanted it to be with the people he wanted on it.
|
|