|
Post by Iron Man on Sept 15, 2006 21:10:31 GMT -5
Yes, two much shows with no posts. I think that they should give quality replys aswell. No 10/10. or Your fed sux.
|
|
|
Post by ICW on Sept 15, 2006 21:14:35 GMT -5
I personally believe that is a horrible rule.
|
|
|
Post by Iron Man on Sept 15, 2006 21:29:27 GMT -5
I personally believe that is a horrible rule. Yeah, but say you posted a Big Show and only got one reply every time, that I am sure would tick you off. That has happened here alot and are making alot of people leave.
|
|
|
Post by ICW on Sept 15, 2006 21:35:11 GMT -5
I personally believe that is a horrible rule. Yeah, but say you posted a Big Show and only got one reply every time, that I am sure would tick you off. That has happened here alot and are making alot of people leave. But forcing people to reply in order to post a show is wrong. It just goes to show you how this board is in a dry spell, which almost all boards go through.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 28, 2024 7:28:14 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2006 7:07:55 GMT -5
10/10 lol no seriasly i agree 100 percent on this the bored may be reserected btw did i spell seriasly right or wrong just wondering.
just had an idea i dont no how many agree but it could work ill post it heare the mod checks out the shows and he says which 3 shows are his favorite and why and stuff.
p.s i will reply to as many peoples shows as if i have time but i dont no about replying to short shows mu2k6 bye people keep smiling and good day all.
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Sept 16, 2006 10:25:44 GMT -5
I somewhat agree with the text fed guys that it is a dumb rule, but it may be a necessary one at this point.
And about the point on "really long, really good" shows... The problem seems to be that people have short attention spans on here, and can't be bothered to read a really long show, no matter how good it is.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 28, 2024 7:28:14 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2006 13:41:35 GMT -5
ermmm like you check most feds read though routhly and say what your 3 favarites are if you get time reply and vote to my fed twc thackyou
|
|
haggard
Superstar
PBL 2-3
Joined on: May 6, 2006 3:33:43 GMT -5
Posts: 670
|
Post by haggard on Sept 18, 2006 8:11:02 GMT -5
Its a mixed subject, but like it was said, if your show is good enough, it should generate replies. Also if you already know a fed is worth it, you can keep going back to the feds that are worth repling too. That would almost create a fan base for the feds that are doing good shows.
and obo why does your sig. say Kamala defeated Danielson on Sept. 30, 2006, its only the 18th.
|
|
TvilleBlueDevil
Mid-Carder
Duke Duke Muthaf*ckas!!!
Joined on: Jun 9, 2005 15:45:10 GMT -5
Posts: 341
|
Post by TvilleBlueDevil on Sept 18, 2006 11:02:21 GMT -5
I think this is an excellent rule. The belief that you will get replies if your show is good enough just hasn't held up on this board. People aren't going to reply if they don't have an incentive to do so, and this will give them that incentive.
|
|
|
Post by ICW on Sept 18, 2006 13:42:57 GMT -5
Its a mixed subject, but like it was said, if your show is good enough, it should generate replies. Also if you already know a fed is worth it, you can keep going back to the feds that are worth repling too. That would almost create a fan base for the feds that are doing good shows. and obo why does your sig. say Kamala defeated Danielson on Sept. 30, 2006, its only the 18th. Because he went forward threw time. Wait you don't know of his powers?
|
|