|
Post by jakks1996collector on Sept 22, 2012 13:16:30 GMT -5
Make it happen WWE.
Especially with how over Bryan and Ryback are. Would be a pretty solid stable this time around.
Why is WWE shocked at the we want Nexus chants? It was the best storyline of 2010. Yes, WWE, it IS possible for the fans to get behind something other than John Cena.
|
|
Kidd For President
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
The Canadian Warrior
Joined on: May 6, 2011 23:45:58 GMT -5
Posts: 803
|
Post by Kidd For President on Sept 22, 2012 13:23:34 GMT -5
I honestly could see Titus taking Daniel Bryan's spot in the Nexus.
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Sept 22, 2012 13:55:33 GMT -5
Dear God, make it happen!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 23, 2024 13:24:06 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2012 16:06:44 GMT -5
It would be cool but I don't see this happening. Half of them are jobbers or have been released and the other half are comedy jobbers. Daniel Bryan, Wade Barrett, Ryback, Darren Young and David Otunga aren't jobbers. And Tarver is the only one that's been released. Bryan wasn't even in Nexus for a full day. Slater is a jobber. Otunga is a jobber. Gabriel is a jobber. Young is barely not a jobber.
|
|
|
Post by Irish Wrestling Entertainment on Sept 22, 2012 17:12:39 GMT -5
My outlook on the entire thing is this: Not a lot of current guys in the WWE entertain me whereas I always found the Nexus entertaining. So I'd be all for bringing them back.
To be honest, it would be easy for them to have a Survivor Series match between The Nexus and those who refused to join back and the opponents who they've encountered over that time.
|
|
|
Post by v/\v on Sept 22, 2012 21:09:41 GMT -5
I just finished watching the avengers, for the first time, so excuse me.......this should be something they build until SVS 2013 because it suits the event and 2012 is far far too soon to pull the trigger on this, make (Heyman's - who else could silently provoke such evil) Nexus such a force, a destructive one and it forces (H's) WWE to come together to fight back with a team of say: Punk, Cena, Brock, Orton and Rock.
That is something that could sell, hugely. If done right.
Bryan, Ryback and Barrett and Young is in a solid spot too, they are all equipped to be part of that sort of match and build. I'd love to see it but it's pure fantasy.
|
|
|
Post by "Living Legend" Duttanized on Sept 22, 2012 23:18:26 GMT -5
Better not happen, Gabriel and Danielson are the only ones that are good in the stable.
|
|
|
Post by ultimateenigma on Sept 22, 2012 23:40:23 GMT -5
i would love it if it was like this
Wade Barrett David Otunga Darren Young Titus O'Neil Heath Slater Justin Gabriel
maybe bring back Mike Tarver, there was always something about him that i really liked.
|
|
|
Post by THE *Legendary* STINGER on Sept 23, 2012 1:03:19 GMT -5
Nexus > Current storylines
|
|
Jimex
Main Eventer
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png)
Joined on: Dec 5, 2009 20:11:18 GMT -5
Posts: 2,794
|
Post by Jimex on Sept 23, 2012 1:18:07 GMT -5
Daniel Bryan, Wade Barrett, Ryback, Darren Young and David Otunga aren't jobbers. And Tarver is the only one that's been released. Bryan wasn't even in Nexus for a full day. Slater is a jobber. Otunga is a jobber. Gabriel is a jobber. Young is barely not a jobber. Otunga has faced the world champion twice this month and is on TV A LOT! That's considered jobbing?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 23, 2024 13:24:06 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2012 1:19:57 GMT -5
Bryan wasn't even in Nexus for a full day. Slater is a jobber. Otunga is a jobber. Gabriel is a jobber. Young is barely not a jobber. Otunga has faced the world champion twice this month and is on TV A LOT! That's considered jobbing? Yes. When was the last time he won a match?
|
|
Jimex
Main Eventer
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png)
Joined on: Dec 5, 2009 20:11:18 GMT -5
Posts: 2,794
|
Post by Jimex on Sept 23, 2012 1:24:35 GMT -5
Otunga has faced the world champion twice this month and is on TV A LOT! That's considered jobbing? Yes. When was the last time he won a match? 5 days ago? www.profightdb.com/wrestlers/david-otunga-6094.htmlHe doesn't win often, but he is facing the World champion, so he is actually being featured on the main shows unlike other "jobbers"
|
|
|
Post by ultimateenigma on Sept 23, 2012 1:28:43 GMT -5
Otunga has faced the world champion twice this month and is on TV A LOT! That's considered jobbing? Yes. When was the last time he won a match? it doesnt matter. that doesnt make him a jobber. with that logic some people would consider the big show a jobber. If you lose to top guys, that doesnt make you a jobber.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 23, 2024 13:24:06 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2012 2:14:43 GMT -5
Yes. When was the last time he won a match? it doesnt matter. that doesnt make him a jobber. with that logic some people would consider the big show a jobber. If you lose to top guys, that doesnt make you a jobber. Comparing Big Show to Otunga is laughable. He is a jobber, maybe not as much as someone like Heath Slater, but he's still a jobber. Just because he loses to top guys doesn't mean crap, it just means they need someone for the top guys to beat.
|
|
|
Post by y2yay on Sept 23, 2012 2:21:27 GMT -5
it doesnt matter. that doesnt make him a jobber. with that logic some people would consider the big show a jobber. If you lose to top guys, that doesnt make you a jobber. Comparing Big Show to Otunga is laughable. He is a jobber, maybe not as much as someone like Heath Slater, but he's still a jobber. Just because he loses to top guys doesn't mean crap, it just means they need someone for the top guys to beat. If that's the case, you might as well consider Dolph Ziggler a jobber too.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 23, 2024 13:24:06 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2012 2:26:41 GMT -5
Comparing Big Show to Otunga is laughable. He is a jobber, maybe not as much as someone like Heath Slater, but he's still a jobber. Just because he loses to top guys doesn't mean crap, it just means they need someone for the top guys to beat. If that's the case, you might as well consider Dolph Ziggler a jobber too. You're missing my point, completely. Otunga is just a guy for people to beat. He serves no purpose other than that.
|
|
|
Post by y2yay on Sept 23, 2012 2:30:31 GMT -5
If that's the case, you might as well consider Dolph Ziggler a jobber too. You're missing my point, completely. Otunga is just a guy for people to beat. He serves no purpose other than that. That's not true though. Anyone who consistently features in storylines and does win matches isn't a jobber. A jobber is someone who usually has no storylines, wins rarely if ever, and like you said, who's SOLE purpose is to get beaten. That isn't Otunga sole purpose.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 23, 2024 13:24:06 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2012 2:35:04 GMT -5
You're missing my point, completely. Otunga is just a guy for people to beat. He serves no purpose other than that. That's not true though. Anyone who consistently features in storylines and does win matches isn't a jobber. A jobber is someone who usually has no storylines, wins rarely if ever, and like you said, who's SOLE purpose is to get beaten. That isn't Otunga sole purpose. Then what's his sole purpose? To sip coffee?
|
|
|
Post by y2yay on Sept 23, 2012 2:36:27 GMT -5
That's not true though. Anyone who consistently features in storylines and does win matches isn't a jobber. A jobber is someone who usually has no storylines, wins rarely if ever, and like you said, who's SOLE purpose is to get beaten. That isn't Otunga sole purpose. Then what's his sole purpose? To sip coffee? He doesn't have a sole purpose. He has multiple purposes. Sometimes it's losing, sometimes it's winning, sometimes it's adding to a storyline....
|
|
|
Post by Todd Pettengill on Sept 23, 2012 2:38:57 GMT -5
That's not true though. Anyone who consistently features in storylines and does win matches isn't a jobber. A jobber is someone who usually has no storylines, wins rarely if ever, and like you said, who's SOLE purpose is to get beaten. That isn't Otunga sole purpose. Then what's his sole purpose? To sip coffee? WWE usually doesn't send a jobber out to do PR work for the company and speak on its behalf. WWE also usually doesn't highlight a jobber most every week in storylines pertaining to the World Champion. Just sayin'. Hes not a "jobber". Its amazing how many people just don't understand what that term means.
|
|