hulkamaniac1055
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Feb 3, 2011 1:08:24 GMT -5
Posts: 402
|
Post by hulkamaniac1055 on Jan 23, 2013 17:24:31 GMT -5
I thought I'd ask you all what you thought the worst RR match in history was. 1995 gets my vote because of how short it was, and lack of star power.
Also 1990 or 1992 is my favorite RR match.
|
|
Jack.
Main Eventer
Probably out Skating
Joined on: Feb 23, 2009 11:06:38 GMT -5
Posts: 4,907
|
Post by Jack. on Jan 23, 2013 17:37:13 GMT -5
Last years was pretty poor, not gonna lie.
|
|
|
|
Post by nwoblackandred4l on Jan 23, 2013 20:23:51 GMT -5
2010. I wouldn't even call it a rumble and no young stars got to shine at all.
the 2012 comedy rumble was just as bad but at least the ring was full.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 29, 2024 16:23:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2013 21:05:17 GMT -5
There's a few. Not too sure which one is worst.  |
|
yinyang
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
We're here...
Joined on: Dec 31, 2002 10:00:22 GMT -5
Posts: 4,110
|
Post by yinyang on Jan 23, 2013 21:13:50 GMT -5
40 man rumble was terrible. KEEP IT CLASSIC..30 MAN RUMBLE ONLY PLEASE!
I feel its a kick in the face to past winners and past participants. Makes allll the facts irrelevant, and those facts mean as much as the match itself. 40 man is terrible, i cant get into seeing entrant number 31!? 32?! 33?!!!! 34?!!? ECT. Bs. You got 1-10 comin out lasting 35 minutes then you got number 38 coming in an winning..there is jus no chance for 1-10 to win and it feel possible. scrap it for life.
|
|
|
|
Post by Scott! on Jan 23, 2013 21:18:25 GMT -5
I found 2010, after punk was eliminated, boring as hell. There was nothing good about the actual rumble itself.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 29, 2024 16:23:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2013 21:51:11 GMT -5
I absolutely hated the 2002 Royal Rumble. There wasn't many guys in the ring at one time, until the end, and by then it was all the main event, big name guys. Booker, Kane, RVD, Angle, Austin, Triple H and such.
That Royal Rumble felt like a lot of small matches going on in it then it did an actual Royal Rumble.
|
|
sideeffect
Superstar
Joined on: Dec 22, 2011 20:08:39 GMT -5
Posts: 593
|
Post by sideeffect on Jan 23, 2013 23:21:29 GMT -5
I thought 1999 was garbage. Even 2000 wasn't that great, it was basically Rock, Big Show and 28 midcarders and jobbers.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prophet of Ash on Jan 23, 2013 23:25:33 GMT -5
1995 was god awful. Almost no one of value, and entrants every 60 seconds. Meaning you had a new forgettable jobber entering every 60 seconds. Who remembers The Headhunters being in the WWF without referencing the 1995 Royal Rumble? WHO??
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 29, 2024 16:23:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2013 23:26:24 GMT -5
1995 was god awful. Almost no one of value, and entrants every 60 seconds. Meaning you had a new forgettable jobber entering every 60 seconds. Who remembers The Headhunters being in the WWF without referencing the 1995 Royal Rumble? WHO?? Headhunters were in the 1996 Royal Rumble. Yoko and Vader eliminated them. |
|
instantklassik
Jobber
Joined on: Nov 22, 2012 3:26:52 GMT -5
Posts: 35
|
Post by instantklassik on Jan 23, 2013 23:32:00 GMT -5
Last years Rumble was All-time terrible. Had ZERO star power. The last good Royal Rumble was 10' when Edge won. Straight Edge Punk on the mic in between his eliminations in the beginning of that Rumble match was great.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 29, 2024 16:23:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2013 7:13:22 GMT -5
1995 Rumble was absolute dog dump.
|
|
|
|
Post by wyleecyotee on Jan 24, 2013 7:20:19 GMT -5
1993 wasn't great. 2010 was god awful and my worst rumble. Last years lacked a lot of things an had too many comical entrants and overall didn't feel like the rumble was important. I like the 95 rumble  Sent from my iPhone using ProBoards app |
|
|
|
Post by Elliot on Jan 24, 2013 8:15:52 GMT -5
What was that one where Mil Mascaras eliminated himself accidentally? That was sh*t. It was as if they pulled people off the street to enter it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 29, 2024 16:23:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2013 8:27:17 GMT -5
Wow I can't believe that 1999 has a vote. To be honest I can't really decide, they all have good qualities to them. For example 1995 has a whole lot of The British Bulldog, so how can that possibly be the worst? If we were going by worst rumble winners, 1992 would get my vote. A hugely stacked rumble card and the worst wrestler in the match won it  . |
|
|
|
Post by wabarrett on Jan 24, 2013 10:10:29 GMT -5
Seen the last 15 of 'em, and 2007 sucked except for the closing minutes. Likewise for 2012. Toss up between those two.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 29, 2024 16:23:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2013 10:30:40 GMT -5
2012 was very disappointing in terms of entrants. Michael Cole, Ricardo Rodriguez, Justin Gabriel, Primo, Santino Marella, Mick Foley, Road Dogg, Epico, Jerry Lawler, Ezekiel Jackson, Jinder Mahal, The Great Khali, Hunico, Booker T, Hacksaw Jim Duggan, Kharma, Road Dogg, Jey Uso, Jimmy Uso, David Otunga all had a 0% chance of winning. When 2/3rds of the entrants are people who are guaranteed not to win, that makes for a very weak Rumble.
|
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Jan 24, 2013 10:42:11 GMT -5
'95 fo sho.
|
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Jan 24, 2013 10:49:12 GMT -5
Remember in 1993 when they could have let Mr. Perfect or Randy Savage win the Royal Rumble and then gave it to Yokozuna instead? Yeah,  that Rumble. The last 3 haven't been particularly good. Punk's promo and then Edge winning sort of made up for the sh*t of the 2010 Rumble for me, but 2011's highlight for me was Diesel, and 2012 sucked minus the last like 5 minutes. I don't know, I guess probably 2011 was my least favorite. Cena eliminating all the Nexus and too many guys, lots of down time, just a bunch of crap imo. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 29, 2024 16:23:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2013 15:06:36 GMT -5
Wow I can't believe that 1999 has a vote. To be honest I can't really decide, they all have good qualities to them. For example 1995 has a whole lot of The British Bulldog, so how can that possibly be the worst?
If we were going by worst rumble winners, 1992 would get my vote. A hugely stacked rumble card and the worst wrestler in the match won it .  |
|
