|
Post by Lk™ on Apr 18, 2013 20:53:28 GMT -5
lots of message boards do it. Rules are made to suit the best interests of society as a whole. You kinda have to follow them. You have an answer for everything cause you like to play devil's advocate. Go be a defense attorney Sometimes those rules are terrible. I'm sure you'd agree that at least one rule that was put into place was terrible. I have an answer for everything because I respond to what you all have been asking me. If I ignored what you asked you'd follow me into the next discussion and say I dodged your questions from this thread. nah i wouldnt hold it against you. I just cant believe some of the crapyou say. I get your point, but you're really not tactful with the way you make your case. Youre just being. "That guy" who opposes everything that most people support
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Apr 18, 2013 20:53:31 GMT -5
No, you can't masturbate in your front yard. Social contract man. Go read some John Locke my friend. I didn't sign that contract. Though it's not like I have a choice since it's certainly not voluntary. It's coercion. You agree to the contact just by living in a society. You reap benefits by being a member of society. Sent from my GT-N8013 using proboards
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Apr 18, 2013 20:56:59 GMT -5
I didn't sign that contract. Though it's not like I have a choice since it's certainly not voluntary. It's coercion. You agree to the contact just by living in a society. You reap benefits by being a member of society. Sent from my GT-N8013 using proboards How can you argue against taxes and Obamacare and then push the social contract?
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Apr 18, 2013 20:57:38 GMT -5
Sometimes those rules are terrible. I'm sure you'd agree that at least one rule that was put into place was terrible. I have an answer for everything because I respond to what you all have been asking me. If I ignored what you asked you'd follow me into the next discussion and say I dodged your questions from this thread. nah i wouldnt hold it against you. I just cant believe some of the crap you say. I get your point, but you're really not tactful with the way you make your case. Youre just being. "That guy" who opposes everything that most people support I don't oppose everything the majority supports.
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Apr 18, 2013 21:02:17 GMT -5
You agree to the contact just by living in a society. You reap benefits by being a member of society. Sent from my GT-N8013 using proboards How can you argue against taxes and Obamacare and then push the social contract? I've never argued against taxes in general. Obamacare has nothing to do with the basic social contract. Sent from my XT907 using proboards
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Apr 18, 2013 21:02:50 GMT -5
How can you argue against taxes and Obamacare and then push the social contract? I've never argued against taxes in general. Obamacare has nothing to do with the basic social contract. Sent from my XT907 using proboards So then what exactly is in the social contract that I didn't sign?
|
|
|
Post by Lk™ on Apr 18, 2013 21:06:05 GMT -5
I've never argued against taxes in general. Obamacare has nothing to do with the basic social contract. Sent from my XT907 using proboards So then what exactly is in the social contract that I didn't sign? you really dont get it, do you? Someone could punch you in the face, and you wouldnt know where the bruise came from. "Theres no proof, it could a rash."
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Apr 18, 2013 21:08:58 GMT -5
So then what exactly is in the social contract that I didn't sign? you really dont get it, do you? Someone could punch you in the face, and you wouldnt know where the bruise came from. "Theres no proof, it could a rash." That doesn't make sense. How do you compare the two? I just want to know what this mystical document contains. Why is that a bad thing? How am I supposed to follow it if I don't know what's in it? I want an exact outline of everything in the social contract. And does that social contract extend to every single place on Earth? If not, why not? When was the social contract written?
|
|
|
Post by Lk™ on Apr 18, 2013 21:13:14 GMT -5
you really dont get it, do you? Someone could punch you in the face, and you wouldnt know where the bruise came from. "Theres no proof, it could a rash." That doesn't make sense. How do you compare the two? I just want to know what this mystical document contains. Why is that a bad thing? How am I supposed to follow it if I don't know what's in it? I want an exact outline of everything in the social contract. And does that social contract extend to every single place on Earth? If not, why not? When was the social contract written? are you one of those people that argues the existence of a higher power because there's no "proof"? Quit being a smart ass.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Apr 18, 2013 21:16:15 GMT -5
That doesn't make sense. How do you compare the two? I just want to know what this mystical document contains. Why is that a bad thing? How am I supposed to follow it if I don't know what's in it? I want an exact outline of everything in the social contract. And does that social contract extend to every single place on Earth? If not, why not? When was the social contract written? are you one of those people that argues the existence of a higher power because there's no "proof"? Quit being a smart ass. No. I don't argue about a higher power. I just want to know what the social contract entails. How am I supposed to abide by it if no one will tell me what's in it?"You have to follow this." "What is it?" "Social contract" "Oh. What's in it?" "It's the Social contract." "I know, you told me. What's in it?" "You must follow it." "If you would tell me what is in it then I'd have a better understanding of what I must follow." "No. You must follow it." "So you want me to follow it without knowing what it is?" "SOCIAL CONTRACT!" Telling me I must follow something that you won't tell me about is ridiculous.
|
|
|
Post by Lk™ on Apr 18, 2013 21:41:04 GMT -5
(Philosophy) (in the theories of Locke, Hobbes, Rousseau, and others) an agreement, entered into by individuals, that results in the formation of the state or of organized society, the prime motive being the desire for protection, which entails the surrender of some or all personal liberties
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Apr 18, 2013 21:46:25 GMT -5
(Philosophy) (in the theories of Locke, Hobbes, Rousseau, and others) an agreement, entered into by individuals, that results in the formation of the state or of organized society, the prime motive being the desire for protection, which entails the surrender of some or all personal liberties First off it says it is an agreement entered into. I was never given the choice to enter into the agreement. I was just told that I have to follow it. Why should we give up any or all liberties in exchange for protection? Ben Franklin had a great quote about that. So if it's written by those old guys who weren't even alive when the Constitution was adopted then what makes it better than the Constitution which people dismiss because of how old it is?
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Apr 18, 2013 21:56:01 GMT -5
They're all public... there's no black and white here. If you think masturbating in your front yard is any more appropriate, you have poor judgement. I swear you just like to argue, just for the sake of arguing. Appropriate? No. Neither is yelling " !!!!!!!!" Still, neither should be illegal. Sorry, it's not my job to not offend you. Pull up your panties.
|
|
|
Post by Lk™ on Apr 18, 2013 22:10:19 GMT -5
They're all public... there's no black and white here. If you think masturbating in your front yard is any more appropriate, you have poor judgement. I swear you just like to argue, just for the sake of arguing. Appropriate? No. Neither is yelling " !!!!!!!!" Still, neither should be illegal. Sorry, it's not my job to not offend you. Pull up your panties. Things just aren't fair, are they? Go rub one out in your front yard, since it's not your job to not offend anybody. And, it's a victimless crime. Some things are just to ridiculous to defend. Lets say i have sex with a 10 year old girl, and she agrees to it, because i've convinced her that i love her. She's not a victim, cause she agreed to it, right? god forbid i have to abide by what society feels is right! i didn't sign the social contract! gimme a break. Social etiquette and common decency towards one another is what society was based on at one point. apparently not anymore.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Apr 18, 2013 22:17:08 GMT -5
Appropriate? No. Neither is yelling " !!!!!!!!" Still, neither should be illegal. Sorry, it's not my job to not offend you. Pull up your panties. Things just aren't fair, are they? Go rub one out in your front yard, since it's not your job to not offend anybody. And, it's a victimless crime. Some things are just to ridiculous to defend. Lets say i have sex with a 10 year old girl, and she agrees to it, because i've convinced her that i love her. She's not a victim, cause she agreed to it, right? god forbid i have to abide by what society feels is right! i didn't sign the social contract! gimme a break. Social etiquette and common decency towards one another is what society was based on at one point. apparently not anymore. No because a 10 year old cannot consent. Society, at times, has thought many ed up things like slavery and segregation. Guess we should have just went along with those because that's what was right at the time.
|
|
|
Post by Lk™ on Apr 18, 2013 22:20:14 GMT -5
Things just aren't fair, are they? Go rub one out in your front yard, since it's not your job to not offend anybody. And, it's a victimless crime. Some things are just to ridiculous to defend. Lets say i have sex with a 10 year old girl, and she agrees to it, because i've convinced her that i love her. She's not a victim, cause she agreed to it, right? god forbid i have to abide by what society feels is right! i didn't sign the social contract! gimme a break. Social etiquette and common decency towards one another is what society was based on at one point. apparently not anymore. No because a 10 year old cannot consent. why not?
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Apr 18, 2013 22:29:09 GMT -5
No because a 10 year old cannot consent. why not? Maybe I'll give some random non-sense answer and say you are a maniac or something like you have done.
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Apr 18, 2013 22:29:29 GMT -5
Things just aren't fair, are they? Go rub one out in your front yard, since it's not your job to not offend anybody. And, it's a victimless crime. Some things are just to ridiculous to defend. Lets say i have sex with a 10 year old girl, and she agrees to it, because i've convinced her that i love her. She's not a victim, cause she agreed to it, right? god forbid i have to abide by what society feels is right! i didn't sign the social contract! gimme a break. Social etiquette and common decency towards one another is what society was based on at one point. apparently not anymore. No because a 10 year old cannot consent. Society, at times, has thought many ed up things like slavery and segregation. Guess we should have just went along with those because that's what was right at the time. Kliquid thinks kids should be able to personally walk into a store and purchase a gun. So if a 10 year old can handle a gun she can handle a penis, right?
|
|
|
Post by Lk™ on Apr 18, 2013 22:31:12 GMT -5
Maybe I'll give some random non-sense answer and say you are a maniac or something like you have done. Don't cop out on this one. Who defines what the age of consent is?
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Apr 18, 2013 22:32:40 GMT -5
gimme a break. Social etiquette and common decency towards one another is what society was based on at one point. apparently not anymore. Exactly. Which is why I don't need the ing government to tell me not to do it.
|
|