|
Post by East Coast on Sept 29, 2013 17:08:39 GMT -5
is McFarlane one of those toy companies that give tons extra body parts as accessories?
I always wished Mattel would do that. Give us swappable heads and hands. But that would make the basic line even more irrelevant
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Sept 29, 2013 17:23:19 GMT -5
WWE wwe 7m Which icon will todd_McFarlane bring life to this week? #RestinPieces pic.twitter.com/BUKXBxFYxd Know what I'm not thinking this is a figure at all now but a way to debut a new comic book. Macfarlane does comics as well
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 20, 2024 9:56:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2013 17:29:30 GMT -5
No....trust me. That's either a statue or figure.
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Sept 29, 2013 17:40:43 GMT -5
No....trust me. That's either a statue or figure. Sorry I'm almost sure now that it's a comic book trust me it bums me out too
|
|
Rob7274
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 3, 2010 5:46:16 GMT -5
Posts: 3,821
|
Post by Rob7274 on Sept 29, 2013 17:50:25 GMT -5
I hope this doesn't effect Mattel in any way... Should I start Panicking!!! Ahhhhh
|
|
|
Post by East Coast on Sept 29, 2013 17:55:30 GMT -5
the picture of Takers hand was definately not from a comic.
|
|
|
Post by MrPerfect25 on Sept 29, 2013 17:56:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Sept 29, 2013 17:58:01 GMT -5
is McFarlane one of those toy companies that give tons extra body parts as accessories? I always wished Mattel would do that. Give us swappable heads and hands. But that would make the basic line even more irrelevant Some Walking dead figures get extra hands or heads, but the Sports Picks figures are basically statues.
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Sept 29, 2013 18:01:20 GMT -5
the picture of Takers hand was definately not from a comic. Idk man looks like a hand drawn picture with added effect to me. The article mrperfect posted is informative. And the picture of His eyes def aren't from an action figure
|
|
WMDman
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
Joined on: Jan 6, 2013 10:18:05 GMT -5
Posts: 4,479
|
Post by WMDman on Sept 29, 2013 18:02:35 GMT -5
Maybe better grade dollar store type figs.
|
|
EMW Figure Shelf
Main Eventer
HAHAHAHA no.
Joined on: Feb 2, 2010 18:38:54 GMT -5
Posts: 1,633
|
Post by EMW Figure Shelf on Sept 29, 2013 18:44:49 GMT -5
Since there is a gap in my Unmatched Fury's and I wanted WWE Macfarlanes for so long, I HOPE THIS IS TRUE!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Sept 29, 2013 18:49:17 GMT -5
I doubt it's a comic if a company called "papercut" has created this
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 20, 2024 9:56:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2013 19:54:13 GMT -5
Also...does THIS look like the face of a guy that knows what the freak is going on?
|
|
|
Post by ~ Cymru ~ on Sept 29, 2013 20:18:48 GMT -5
so wwe has been posting these cryptic tweets everyones thinking ita the return of undertaker but im guessing they'll be announcing a partnership with McFarlane
|
|
MBG1211
Main Eventer
Check out my latest Wrestling Figure Photography on Instagram!
Joined on: Mar 13, 2012 12:03:47 GMT -5
Posts: 1,756
|
Post by MBG1211 on Sept 29, 2013 20:23:03 GMT -5
I'd just stop speculating and just wait to see what it is...reading some of the comments on this thread is quite entertaining. McFarlane would NOT be able to make toys because Mattel has the license to do so. MAYBE they could make statues. Wicked Cool Toys is an example of another toy company who has the WWE license, however, they're only able to make more minuscule toys rather than action figures. Just be patient and wait it out...
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 20, 2024 9:56:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2013 22:01:17 GMT -5
First off, Bleacher Report. They know jack, and are consistently pulling things from their asses. This writer is postulating. He assumed that first Tweet was about Kane, because it had red and black pieces in it. With "red being associated with Kane and black being Taker". A plus work there, Ace. You know what else has those colors? Secondly...an out of focus hand drawn hand? Dude...I have been collecting for over 20 years. I know prototypes when I see one. THAT is a GD figure/statue. And yes....the eyes too. The only way that this is a drawing, with how pure and clean the images along with shadows, etc. are, is if this were a painting. McFarlane is a penciller. Not a painter. Boy, your "know it all" attitude sure is ing annoying.
|
|
|
Post by poindizzle on Sept 29, 2013 22:13:35 GMT -5
I feel like they would have said something about Image Comics if it were a comic, McFarlane's studio is still a part of Image, and secondly, good God I hope they aren't letting McFarlane near even a variant cover. I know the man won't draw a full issue of a book, but trust me, that's a good thing. The man never learned the fundamentals of how to actually draw, he just halfway learned and then canoodles on top of it. McFarlane is an insult to the artists who really learned how to draw.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 20, 2024 9:56:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2013 22:21:58 GMT -5
I'd just stop speculating and just wait to see what it is...reading some of the comments on this thread is quite entertaining. McFarlane would NOT be able to make toys because Mattel has the license to do so. MAYBE they could make statues. Wicked Cool Toys is an example of another toy company who has the WWE license, however, they're only able to make more minuscule toys rather than action figures. Just be patient and wait it out... That's funny....because McFarlane Toys also has the Assassin's Creed license: So, they have things like role play Arm blades, and action figures. But....but what's this?? Another SEPARATE toy company by the name of Square Enix is making Assassin's Creed action figures? But....that CAN'T be! Because, according to Daniel Bryan....no two toy companies can produce action figures for the same license at the same time!
|
|
|
Post by The Mask of Truth on Sept 30, 2013 3:56:33 GMT -5
According to what I've read it's a comic book, but who knows. Some small poseable statues would be great with some 1 of 500 limited figures thrown in randomly.
|
|
|
Post by Vamp55 on Sept 30, 2013 5:18:46 GMT -5
Plenty of cross licences in the world of toys etc. Hot toys has pretty much every one, including marvel and DC, yet other company's make different scale and quality figures, or the same characters. My guess is that as long as they are catering to different markets, then there would be no issue what's so ever with it. Who knows maybe its macfarlenes first 1/6 figure and wwe is where they are starting.
|
|