|
Post by qdogg on Oct 23, 2013 14:50:41 GMT -5
He didnt have the meat hooks in 2002/2003 I believe. They must of been added to his back later.
|
|
|
Post by Roman Bellic on Oct 23, 2013 16:37:51 GMT -5
I totally appreciate the desire for accuracy, but this observation as a compliant is a little too much. I respect that everyone has an opinion and expectation as a consumer, but to critique the size of that main back tat is too much. The hooks could still fit if one wanted to add them. These are $20 action figures from a mainstream mfg and not high end premium format collectibles from Sideshow or Hot Toys and as such should be judged and critiqued accordingly. I have an OCD expectation when it comes to articulation. I do not want action features or any pre-posed arms, legs etc so I can relate to having specific expectations, but there are certain limiting factors and acceptable standards that have to be taken into consideration when looking at a mass-market action figure. Don't ruin the poetntial to enjoy this figure by over-analyzing it. Just my 2 cents. I agree, I swear people nitpick just for the sake of nitpicking, I find it stupid as hell, and a petty reason to nitpick just like how people used to complain how the Mattel Distribution sucked
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Oct 23, 2013 16:43:12 GMT -5
It's not really a different size, so much as it's moved further up his back. So if anything is incorrect, it's the placement.
|
|
#SHOWOFF
Superstar
Joined on: Sept 6, 2011 17:08:42 GMT -5
Posts: 974
|
Post by #SHOWOFF on Oct 23, 2013 17:53:01 GMT -5
This is also the case in some Rey figures and I'm sure others as well. Not a big deal at all since I'm sure neither is 100% to scale.
|
|