|
|
Post by LtD73 on Dec 27, 2013 16:47:37 GMT -5
WWE's long-running Authority storyline is currently scheduled to climax at WrestleMania XXX on April 6, 2014 at the Mercedes-Benz Superdome in New Orleans, Louisiana, with Triple H facing CM Punk in a singles match. However, there is also the possibility of Roman Reigns facing "The Game" at the pay-per-view event spectacular, as the 28-year-old is currently slated as a "back-up plan." In recent weeks, WWE has teased a Reigns babyface turn.
-ewrestlingnews.com
While HHH/Punk and A Shield Triple Threat would be amazing at WM30, I really like the sound of HHH/Reigns, that could make the guy over night, either way I'm excited.
|
|
|
|
Post by Planktung on Dec 27, 2013 16:50:09 GMT -5
Hunter/Reigns is something that I would love to see, but fast-tracking it for 'Mania? That I'm not certain about.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jericho Is God!™ on Dec 27, 2013 16:50:56 GMT -5
do you really think though at WM30 HHH would put Roman Reigns over...let alone Punk.
I'm more for the Punk/HHH and a shield 3 way for the US title.
|
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Dec 27, 2013 16:53:31 GMT -5
do you really think though at WM30 HHH would put Roman Reigns over...let alone Punk. I'm more for the Punk/HHH and a shield 3 way for the US title. True but if WM30 is the end of The Authority, Triple H would presumably get his comeuppance at WM |
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Dec 27, 2013 16:54:40 GMT -5
do you really think though at WM30 HHH would put Roman Reigns over...let alone Punk. I'm more for the Punk/HHH and a shield 3 way for the US title. I agree. Reigns shouldn't be rushed to the main event imo. Let him win the US Title at WM 30 and maybe the following year face HHH or some other big name at WM 31. |
|
|
|
Post by ztj_wwf on Dec 27, 2013 16:55:29 GMT -5
HHH/Reigns would be cool, but I'd much rather see Reigns/Rollins/Ambrose for the US Title and maybe HHH/Reigns next year.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 15:36:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2013 17:04:59 GMT -5
Really? He doesn't deserve it. They did that with Sheamus at Mania 26, but at least Sheamus had been built up as an extreme brute force, "ending" a few guys careers, beating Cena and winning the WWE title, beating guys like Orton too as well. Reigns has done nothing but do a few repeat spots of the spear through the barricade and ride the co-tails of Ambrose considering he pretty much leads the group and does all the mic work. He deserves a Mania match like a lot of WWE superstars, but definitely does not deserve to be that high up on the card and not against Triple H with the very little accomplishments he has
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 15:36:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2013 17:07:19 GMT -5
I like the idea although I'd rather see him vs punk
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Dec 27, 2013 17:11:31 GMT -5
I would like HHH vs Reigns. But I'm not sure if it's one of those attention grabber matches. I think it would be better if the card looks like this:
Cena vs Taker
Bryan vs Michaels
Orton vs Punk
Batista vs Lesnar
HHH vs Rock? Maybe..
Dean Ambrose vs Seth Rollins vs Roman Reigns
Cody Rhodes vs Goldust
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 15:36:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2013 17:22:11 GMT -5
do you really think though at WM30 HHH would put Roman Reigns over...let alone Punk.I'm more for the Punk/HHH and a shield 3 way for the US title. Yes, I do. I'm not one of those who automatically jumps down Triple H's throat and assumes he's just going to "bury" everybody. I easily see HHH putting over Punk or Reigns at Mania. I don't get why people have such a vendetta against Triple H. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 15:36:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2013 17:23:58 GMT -5
Reigns vs HHH would be my piss break.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 15:36:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2013 17:24:26 GMT -5
If they go with Reigns, it doesn't matter if he wins or loses. As long as he looks strong in the match it could catapult him, and the sky's the limit for Reigns IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian from 616Entertainment. on Dec 27, 2013 17:53:37 GMT -5
Reigns vs HHH would be my piss break. I like Dean Ambrose, but you constantly posting such brash opinions with his name and face attached to them almost sours me on the man himself. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 15:36:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2013 19:02:37 GMT -5
Reigns vs HHH would be my piss break. I like Dean Ambrose, but you constantly posting such brash opinions with his name and face attached to them almost sours me on the man himself. So because I don't like either wrestlers in a match and I'm gonna use it as my piss break it has something to do with Dean Ambrose? Don't really get your logic there bud. |
|
|
|
Post by Ian from 616Entertainment. on Dec 27, 2013 19:09:47 GMT -5
I like Dean Ambrose, but you constantly posting such brash opinions with his name and face attached to them almost sours me on the man himself. So because I don't like either wrestlers in a match and I'm gonna use it as my piss break it has something to do with Dean Ambrose? Don't really get your logic there bud. I said exactly what I meant. Yes, calling it a 'piss break' is a very brash, bold opinion. As I said. And you're so soaked in Dean Ambrose's name and image that some of us relate him to your opinions. ...As I stated. What don't you understand? |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 15:36:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2013 19:26:16 GMT -5
So because I don't like either wrestlers in a match and I'm gonna use it as my piss break it has something to do with Dean Ambrose? Don't really get your logic there bud. I said exactly what I meant. Yes, calling it a 'piss break' is a very brash, bold opinion. As I said. And you're so soaked in Dean Ambrose's name and image that some of us relate him to your opinions. ...As I stated. What don't you understand? Well, sucks for you then. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 15:36:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2013 19:29:26 GMT -5
do you really think though at WM30 HHH would put Roman Reigns over...let alone Punk. I'm more for the Punk/HHH and a shield 3 way for the US title. I'd die to see Punk & Bryan vs HHH & Shawn Michaels Roman Reigns vs Undertaker |
|
|
|
Post by Ian from 616Entertainment. on Dec 27, 2013 19:30:04 GMT -5
I said exactly what I meant. Yes, calling it a 'piss break' is a very brash, bold opinion. As I said. And you're so soaked in Dean Ambrose's name and image that some of us relate him to your opinions. ...As I stated. What don't you understand? Well, sucks for you then. Oh. Okay. I knew better than to say anything anyway. Don't know why I get sucked into time wasting exchanges like this, after being here almost, what, 8 years? |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 15:36:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2013 19:37:42 GMT -5
Well, sucks for you then. Oh. Okay. I knew better than to say anything anyway. Don't know why I get sucked into time wasting exchanges like this, after being here almost, what, 8 years? Yep. Shoulda known better. |
|
JWC
Main Eventer
JWC'2010-Forever'
Joined on: Sept 27, 2010 18:39:33 GMT -5
Posts: 1,237
|
Post by JWC on Dec 27, 2013 19:46:48 GMT -5
How about punk vs Austin!
|
|
