|
|
Post by Weemanv1 on Jan 14, 2014 20:51:22 GMT -5
1992 the warlord 1996 duke the dumpster droese Definitely agree with Droese. |
|
|
|
Post by TheChamp420 on Jan 14, 2014 20:53:52 GMT -5
Didn't like 2011
|
|
|
|
Post by Escape The Rules on Jan 15, 2014 6:30:41 GMT -5
I can't think of any I was disappointed with, but I'm sick of the winner being the 30th entrant. It's too cliché, so much so you expect the last entrant to win a large portion of the time. In fact WWE likes to hype up them being the winner every year. The last winner I marked out for was the Undertaker in 2007, the end with HBK was excellent. Before that I thought Batista-Cena in 2005 was pretty well done despite it was a mistake them both going out together. There's only ever been 2 that won from number 30... |
|
|
|
Post by Next Manufactured’s Sweater on Jan 15, 2014 6:35:50 GMT -5
I can't think of any I was disappointed with, but I'm sick of the winner being the 30th entrant. It's too cliché, so much so you expect the last entrant to win a large portion of the time. In fact WWE likes to hype up them being the winner every year. #30 should win more, to really build the idea that getting that last spot is a huge deal. It's silly that as many people have won from the #1 spot as from #30. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 15:18:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2014 11:19:40 GMT -5
Honestly...I may get flack for this but...
Undertaker.
He drew #30 like three times before he finally won.
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Wrestling on Jan 15, 2014 11:55:09 GMT -5
Honestly...I may get flack for this but... Undertaker. He drew #30 like three times before he finally won. I know he got #30 on 2007 and 2003. What other Rumble did he get #30? |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 15:18:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2014 12:24:26 GMT -5
Honestly...I may get flack for this but... Undertaker. He drew #30 like three times before he finally won. I know he got #30 on 2007 and 2003. What other Rumble did he get #30? 1997 |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 15:18:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2014 15:11:18 GMT -5
when you think about it it should be damaging for a big name to come in at 30 and NOT win it.
its like "they come in at 30 and still cant get it done? what f*cking use are they?"
I know it never seems to but you would think it would.
|
|
|
|
Post by wyleecyotee on Jan 15, 2014 15:28:29 GMT -5
when you think about it it should be damaging for a big name to come in at 30 and NOT win it. its like "they come in at 30 and still cant get it done? what f*cking use are they?" I know it never seems to but you would think it would. Yeah I remember as a kid, like in 01 when rikishi came in I genuinely thought "oh no he's big and #30, he might win!" I'd prefer a surprise/return for #30 so of it is someone like rvd or Jericho then that can be out down to ring rust or something. |
|
|
|
Post by CMPUNKISGOOD on Jan 15, 2014 15:30:13 GMT -5
Big Show
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Wrestling on Jan 15, 2014 17:05:51 GMT -5
when you think about it it should be damaging for a big name to come in at 30 and NOT win it. its like "they come in at 30 and still cant get it done? what f*cking use are they?" I know it never seems to but you would think it would. With Goldberg it made sense though, because he got attacked and distracted. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 15:18:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2014 6:00:47 GMT -5
when you think about it it should be damaging for a big name to come in at 30 and NOT win it. its like "they come in at 30 and still cant get it done? what f*cking use are they?" I know it never seems to but you would think it would. With Goldberg it made sense though, because he got attacked and distracted. oh yeah that made sense for sure. But in regular cases like UT,Show etc coming in at 30 and not getting it done. |
|
|
|
Post by Halloween King on Jan 17, 2014 13:03:28 GMT -5
Chyna
|
|
|
|
Post by Double J JoshuaJohn on Jan 17, 2014 21:39:53 GMT -5
Booker t 2002, I was routing for Kevin nash
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 15:18:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2014 6:37:24 GMT -5
yeah pretty bad.....she comes in...eliminates Henry and gets tossed by Austin infuriating HHH. Didn't she turn on DX the next night actually? also she eliminated Jericho in RR2000. That's just all kinds of wrong |
|
|
|
Post by Halloween King on Jan 19, 2014 3:25:07 GMT -5
yeah pretty bad.....she comes in...eliminates Henry and gets tossed by Austin infuriating HHH. Didn't she turn on DX the next night actually? also she eliminated Jericho in RR2000. That's just all kinds of wrong For any woman to be put in the place of a man is horrible. I dont know which is worse. The fact that they put her into the rumble, thus letting me know she was a novelty entrant. OR That they put her in with actual intent of making her World Champ. |
|
DestroyerOfNations
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Nov 29, 2011 18:39:50 GMT -5
Posts: 2,855
|
Post by DestroyerOfNations on Jan 19, 2014 12:56:03 GMT -5
I don't think Chyna was that bad in the rumble. Especially the 1999 one. Everyone knew it was going to be Austin or Vince, it was just a matter of getting there. Chyna won the battle royal for the no. 30 spot, came in to a huge pop, eliminated Henry, and got clotheslined out the ring by Stone Cold. Nothing special really, but at the time she was the most over women in the business, and stayed that way for a while, and the WWF was milking her for all she's worth. She was even the no. 1 contender at a point.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 15:18:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2014 13:21:15 GMT -5
Though I can't say my knowledge of the history of the Royal Rumble is that great, Ric Flair in 2005 was pretty dull. the segments with him and guerrero were gold that night |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 15:18:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2014 13:43:12 GMT -5
Though I can't say my knowledge of the history of the Royal Rumble is that great, Ric Flair in 2005 was pretty dull. the segments with him and guerrero were gold that night Guerrero stole my number! |
|
gravedigger3
Main Eventer
Empire Wrestling Federation
Joined on: Apr 7, 2006 21:17:04 GMT -5
Posts: 3,434
|
Post by gravedigger3 on Jan 19, 2014 20:04:44 GMT -5
I can't think of the year but Big Show, masked Kane had just returned and faced Cena earlier that day but I really thought Kane would be in the match, but instead Show showed up and killed Kane's straight royal rumble streak
|
|
