|
Post by King Silva on Feb 2, 2014 0:04:40 GMT -5
That sounds okay I guess but why not try and have a match with him at SS 2014 and then WM 31?
Who else besides Taker does Sting really really need to wrestle?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:46:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2014 0:37:32 GMT -5
Black tights tucked into black boots god dammit. This is the big leagues and that sh** is not dark. We're halfway there on the scale of not dark to dark, so if we can have a few more elements. Maybe like some cob webs in a corner, some fire...somewhere, Gangrel plays a bit part but gets beat in a second, I mean we need this to be really DARK. Needs more Black Rain....
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Feb 2, 2014 0:38:33 GMT -5
They weren't building match 1 year out.
They wrote it into the story to help explain why UT was carted off. WWE wanted to protect his character. I think they contemplated a rematch after the fact, but I dont think those plans were in stone like Rock/Cena.
|
|
johnnyaustin21
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 21, 2011 14:16:20 GMT -5
Posts: 1,609
|
Post by johnnyaustin21 on Feb 2, 2014 1:34:40 GMT -5
I would be okay with the idea if it builds to a match up against Triple H for control of the company.Vince puts Sting in charge while Triple H/Stephanie also still have power.Think back in the day with Vince/Flair and the 50/50 stuff.
But ideally for me Hulk Hogan would be put in the GM role and Sting would just appear from time to time in the next year a wrestle a few high profile matches before facing The Undertaker or Triple H at WM 31 and retiring.
Now if you wanted to due something really interesting which would never happen.Is if you restated the brand split and made Smackdown in to WCW.Then have Sting as the GM of WCW/Smackdown while Undertaker would be the GM of WWE/RAW.That would be one way to keep both men on the air in a non wrestling role while building to the dream "WWE .Vs WCW" showdown at Wrestlemania,hell you don't even have to bring back the WCW name(even though it sell like hot cakes) but just have the brand split back with each man being GM.
|
|
Noel Jr.
Main Eventer
BCA 4 Life!
Joined on: Jul 14, 2005 17:52:02 GMT -5
Posts: 1,443
|
Post by Noel Jr. on Feb 2, 2014 4:25:37 GMT -5
The first thing that will make me laugh if this does happen is that the marks won't be all over the WWE Facebook page saying they are copying TNA whereas if it was the other way around the TNA page would be bombarded.
I don't think it's a good idea bringing him in as GM. It kind of shows me how out of touch the writers are. Sting is aged that is granted BUT there is still some time to make a few memorable moments that can be given to us. Give us a year or so with him as a regular performer and then make him GM but please don't bring him straight in as GM.
|
|
|
Post by Mox on Feb 2, 2014 5:03:30 GMT -5
How would it make sense to make a guy who just got there, the RAW GM? He just got there. Give the man his grand entrance. Roll out the red carpet and make it a big deal. Then let him feud with someone who is pissed he's coming in and taking the spot light. He wrestles only a couple big PPVS. People will understand. Just like people understand why Taker is never around. I don't understand why this has to be harder than it needs to be.
|
|
|
Post by 3Ð on Feb 2, 2014 5:25:37 GMT -5
I thought they were trying to get over the fact that Takers days are numbered, honestly. And you know else gassed? Batista at the Rumble lol Yes he was. LOL! Pretty sure that was planned to sell how brutal the match was to Taker. No way was Taker so exhausted he couldn't walk. That's silly. He was so dehydrated, he needed medical attention. He worse himself out. Whats silly is if you think WWE was gonna let UT get carried off on a stretcher just to sell the brutality of the match....ESPECIALLY when HHH walked out. Trust me, he needed medical attention. Every time I see a post by you I think of this video
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:46:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2014 6:35:24 GMT -5
I'd rather he didn't sign. To me it's like he's been gone for 13 years, to come back in the spotlight after that long just to be a crappy GM is lame as . Sting vs. Undertaker at WM30 or don't bother.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:46:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2014 7:06:51 GMT -5
Couldn't care less about a 52 year old. -- Dean Ambrose is eventually going to turn 52; you gonna turn your back on him then, when he does..? I highly doubt Ambrose is gonna pass 40. Drugs,alcohol and smoking. He's going sooner than most.
|
|
|
Post by Jack on Feb 2, 2014 7:08:09 GMT -5
Would not mind this.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:46:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2014 7:15:26 GMT -5
I'd rather he didn't sign. To me it's like he's been gone for 13 years, to come back in the spotlight after that long just to be a crappy GM is lame as . Sting vs. Undertaker at WM30 or don't bother. No way AF.....I want him to sign. its the only way we see a proper Sting DVD with Documentary and other merchandise like figures etc. My Godson Sean will freak out if/when I tell him Sting signed....and that's a moment I wanna see. I genuinely don't care if he wrestles or not. If I'm honest I don't care for UT vs Sting either. I could see the GM angle setting up Sting vs HHH at WM if he comes in soon.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:46:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2014 7:34:43 GMT -5
I'd rather he didn't sign. To me it's like he's been gone for 13 years, to come back in the spotlight after that long just to be a crappy GM is lame as . Sting vs. Undertaker at WM30 or don't bother. No way AF.....I want him to sign. its the only way we see a proper Sting DVD with Documentary and other merchandise like figures etc. My Godson Sean will freak out if/when I tell him Sting signed....and that's a moment I wanna see. I genuinely don't care if he wrestles or not. If I'm honest I don't care for UT vs Sting either. I could see the GM angle setting up Sting vs HHH at WM if he comes in soon. I still want him to sign a Legends deal, but I don't want him turning up on TV just to be a GM. I too really want a Sting DVD, I'd buy it in a heart beat (only if he was involved obviously). As you probably know, I really do want Sting vs. Undertaker, but it's already airing heavily on the side of 'too late'. Another year, and Sting'll be the OTHER side of 55. At a landmark/nostalgia feeling PPV like WM30, it's now the last ditch effort for this match to happen in my eyes. And him being a GM is just a waste of everybody's time. I can't believe he'd even agree to do it, that'd destroy the memory of his career faster than jobbing to Hornswoggle.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:46:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2014 7:46:49 GMT -5
ya see Sting as GM can be good.....it could lead to an angle where he faces HHH and defeats him @ Summerslam maybe?
although given WWEs current creative block I wouldn't bank on that happening.
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Feb 2, 2014 7:52:22 GMT -5
I could live with that. I don't need to see Sting wrestle in a WWE ring. Nor do I need to see him wrestle the Undertaker at WM. Would I watch it? Sure I would because Sting was in it, but it isn't needed in my eyes. Mainly because I don't need Sting to lose to the Undertaker at WM. And I certainly don't think Taker should ever lose to anyone at WM. He should retire undefeated at WM.
I just need the DVD anthology and figures his signing would finally bring us... 1. HoF Induction 2. 3-4 Anthology Disc set 3. A ton of FB's 4. Hopefully a TRU exclusive "Evolution of Sting" box set like they did with Rey.
So if he is the RAW GM we can get all that along with a match or two along the way. But that would be a win/win in my book.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:46:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2014 7:52:48 GMT -5
ya see Sting as GM can be good.....it could lead to an angle where he faces HHH and defeats him @ Summerslam maybe? although given WWEs current creative block I wouldn't bank on that happening. He needs to come in on a high, being a GM doesn't do that for me. If he came in, fought Taker at WM30, THEN became a GM to go up against HHH at Summerslam, then yeah that'd be much better.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:46:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2014 7:59:17 GMT -5
ya see Sting as GM can be good.....it could lead to an angle where he faces HHH and defeats him @ Summerslam maybe? although given WWEs current creative block I wouldn't bank on that happening. He needs to come in on a high, being a GM doesn't do that for me. If he came in, fought Taker at WM30, THEN became a GM to go up against HHH at Summerslam, then yeah that'd be much better. yeah.....that's good too.Part of the reason I don't see him facing UT is because of his protective nature over the Sting character. 1)would he want to lose his first competitive outing in WWE? 2)He is VERY aware that he would be booed by the crowd. those two things make me think Borden wants no part of a UT match.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:46:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2014 8:04:17 GMT -5
He needs to come in on a high, being a GM doesn't do that for me. If he came in, fought Taker at WM30, THEN became a GM to go up against HHH at Summerslam, then yeah that'd be much better. yeah.....that's good too.Part of the reason I don't see him facing UT is because of his protective nature over the Sting character. 1)would he want to lose his first competitive outing in WWE? 2)He is VERY aware that he would be booed by the crowd. those two things make me think Borden wants no part of a UT match. I don't see why he'd be booed? He's always been popular. And I don't see why losing is a big issue, he's 55 (come WM) and it'll be in a main event against a guy 21-0 at WM. He's not Goldberg or the Ultimate Warrior, he's lost plenty of times before. As long as it's a close/competitive match it should be fine. And he's always been vocal about wanting Undertaker at WM.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:46:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2014 8:15:01 GMT -5
yeah.....that's good too.Part of the reason I don't see him facing UT is because of his protective nature over the Sting character. 1)would he want to lose his first competitive outing in WWE? 2)He is VERY aware that he would be booed by the crowd. those two things make me think Borden wants no part of a UT match. I don't see why he'd be booed? He's always been popular. And I don't see why losing is a big issue, he's 55 (come WM) and it'll be in a main event against a guy 21-0 at WM. He's not Goldberg or the Ultimate Warrior, he's lost plenty of times before. As long as it's a close/competitive match it should be fine. And he's always been vocal about wanting Undertaker at WM. yeah that's true but He has been vocal about a lot of things that haven't really rang true though AF. and he would be booed by a large portion of the crowd vs Undertaker-but yeah maybe he wont care. I don't see any hassle with it but maybe Borden would.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:46:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2014 8:20:22 GMT -5
I don't see why he'd be booed? He's always been popular. And I don't see why losing is a big issue, he's 55 (come WM) and it'll be in a main event against a guy 21-0 at WM. He's not Goldberg or the Ultimate Warrior, he's lost plenty of times before. As long as it's a close/competitive match it should be fine. And he's always been vocal about wanting Undertaker at WM. yeah that's true but He has been vocal about a lot of things that haven't really rang true though AF. and he would be booed by a large portion of the crowd vs Undertaker-but yeah maybe he wont care. I don't see any hassle with it but maybe Borden would. True. I guess we'll see either way within the next few weeks.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:46:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2014 8:30:34 GMT -5
yeah that's true but He has been vocal about a lot of things that haven't really rang true though AF. and he would be booed by a large portion of the crowd vs Undertaker-but yeah maybe he wont care. I don't see any hassle with it but maybe Borden would. True. I guess we'll see either way within the next few weeks. Hope so!!
|
|