|
Post by Rontaro13 on Mar 23, 2014 16:02:51 GMT -5
Jericho vs. Undertaker and Cena vs. Undertaker are the 2 streak matches I want to see more than anything else.
|
|
Jamal
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 24, 2005 14:53:44 GMT -5
Posts: 4,877
|
Post by Jamal on Mar 23, 2014 16:04:18 GMT -5
No thanks. Jericho has no credibility as he's been jobbing left and right the last couple of years.
|
|
|
23-0?
Mar 23, 2014 16:21:05 GMT -5
Post by ztj_wwf on Mar 23, 2014 16:21:05 GMT -5
I see him beating Lesnar this year, beating Sting at 31, and then retiring by beating Cena at 32 in Cowboys Stadium. Retire at 24? 25 would be the perfect number. 32 would be 25 years since his Mania debut...And it's (apparently) going to be in his home state.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 21:46:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2014 16:23:43 GMT -5
Retire at 24? 25 would be the perfect number. 32 would be 25 years since his Mania debut...And it's (apparently) going to be in his home state. 30- 22. 31- 23. 32- 24. 33- 25
|
|
|
Post by ztj_wwf on Mar 23, 2014 18:24:13 GMT -5
32 would be 25 years since his Mania debut...And it's (apparently) going to be in his home state. 30- 22. 31- 23. 32- 24. 33- 25 I said 25 years...Not 25 wins. WM 7: 1991 WM 32: 2016
|
|
|
Post by dylan on Mar 23, 2014 18:30:54 GMT -5
Is it safe to say I'm not the only one who was suspecting him to say it should be against Ambrose?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 21:46:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
23-0?
Mar 23, 2014 18:51:48 GMT -5
dylan likes this
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2014 18:51:48 GMT -5
Is it safe to say I'm not the only one who was suspecting him to say it should be against Ambrose? That's the swerve here. Don't worry, Ambrose is gonna be 24-0.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 21:46:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2014 18:59:16 GMT -5
Am I the only one that thinks the people that use the "he has no chance to win" excuse as to why someone shouldn't wrestle Taker are ridiculous?
Name the last time someone actually "had a chance" at beating Taker? Name someone that actually "has a chance" to beat Taker?
It's so stupid. Did anyone expect Shawn to beat him? Did anyone expect Hunter to beat him? Did anyone expect Punk to beat him?
By that logic, none of those matches should have happened because they "had no chance to win".
|
|
|
23-0?
Mar 23, 2014 19:00:50 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by McBlake on Mar 23, 2014 19:00:50 GMT -5
Brock, Sting, Cena retire.
Absolutely no other combinations would come close to matching that imo.
Having Cena last for the chance of 25-0 yet still the element of doubt against super Cena. Would be epic. Wouldn't mind a long buildup with super Cena again if it resulted in that. Have him go a bit heel saying thats left for him to accomplish in the business is ending the streak.
|
|
|
23-0?
Mar 23, 2014 19:11:38 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Shane O. on Mar 23, 2014 19:11:38 GMT -5
I've wanted to see Jericho vs Undertaker for years now. I'd love to see it next year, Cena vs Undertaker at Mania 32 then Sting vs Undertaker for 25-0 where they both retire. Nobody I repeat NOBODY should end the streak.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 21:46:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
23-0?
Mar 23, 2014 19:12:10 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2014 19:12:10 GMT -5
Taker goes for a clothesline right off the bat.
ArmBAR!
22-1
|
|
|
23-0?
Mar 23, 2014 19:22:22 GMT -5
Post by Next Manufactured’s Sweater on Mar 23, 2014 19:22:22 GMT -5
Nah, Jericho's not on that level.
|
|
|
23-0?
Mar 23, 2014 19:24:16 GMT -5
Post by BoJack Hogan on Mar 23, 2014 19:24:16 GMT -5
Taker has nobody else to fight besides Jericho and Cena (or Sting I guess, but I would rather not be disappointed by how that would likely look in practice)...both are matches I would prefer to Lesnar/Taker...similar to Punk/Taker, HHH/Taker 3... I hope he sticks around for both matches, then retires. I think the Jericho match would easily be the better of the two, but I still want to see Cena take on the streak. They haven't even really had a proper feud yet if memory serves. Jericho may not have either. Regardless, those are both matches I would love to see at Wrestlemania if Taker still has 2 years left in him, which I am not sure that he does.
As far as the streak goes, nobody should beat it now. Either Orton (who no longer needs it) or Edge should have done it if it were to be done. Now there is no need, no up-and-comer is worthy, and no main eventer or legend needs it.
|
|
|
23-0?
Mar 23, 2014 19:39:51 GMT -5
Post by wwextreme25 on Mar 23, 2014 19:39:51 GMT -5
I heard Taker wants the streak to end eventually to put someone over, but vince never wants it to end and wants taker to retire without losing.
|
|
|
23-0?
Mar 23, 2014 21:55:42 GMT -5
Post by cripplercrossface on Mar 23, 2014 21:55:42 GMT -5
I think Undertaker should never lose at Wrestlemania. His very last match should be a win and not a loss.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 21:46:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2014 4:41:46 GMT -5
Brock, Sting, Cena retire. Absolutely no other combinations would come close to matching that imo. Having Cena last for the chance of 25-0 yet still the element of doubt against super Cena. Would be epic. Wouldn't mind a long buildup with super Cena again if it resulted in that. Have him go a bit heel saying thats left for him to accomplish in the business is ending the streak. as I have said MANY times.....Cena offers something else no other opponent offers.....and that's an element of doubt. And that would add so much dram to the match, no matter how SMALL that element of doubt may be.
|
|
|
23-0?
Mar 24, 2014 5:06:32 GMT -5
Post by Mike Giggs' Munchies on Mar 24, 2014 5:06:32 GMT -5
Brock, Sting, Cena retire. Absolutely no other combinations would come close to matching that imo. Having Cena last for the chance of 25-0 yet still the element of doubt against super Cena. Would be epic. Wouldn't mind a long buildup with super Cena again if it resulted in that. Have him go a bit heel saying thats left for him to accomplish in the business is ending the streak. That would leave it at 24-0, you need one more. I'd stick Rock in at WM32 for the supermatch feel, then Cena at WM33 for 25-0 with that element of doubt.
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Mar 24, 2014 6:12:59 GMT -5
Nobody should ever end the streak. That is one of the main reasons people get/go to WM is to see Taker win. Let's face it at this point there isn't anyone who could beat the record. Hell even if the streak had ended at 20 - 0 there's nobody that could surpass that...So why end it?
|
|
|
23-0?
Mar 24, 2014 6:21:12 GMT -5
Post by Dan on Mar 24, 2014 6:21:12 GMT -5
I'm not fussed about him working with Jericho at Wrestlemania. At this point in time, I'm more interested in a credible threat to the Streak rather than seeing a good Match. A young star such as a Roman Reigns, along with John Cena would give us a much greater sense that the Streak could be broken as opposed to a Match with a Jericho or an RVD etc.
|
|
|
23-0?
Mar 24, 2014 6:40:30 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by McBlake on Mar 24, 2014 6:40:30 GMT -5
Brock, Sting, Cena retire. Absolutely no other combinations would come close to matching that imo. Having Cena last for the chance of 25-0 yet still the element of doubt against super Cena. Would be epic. Wouldn't mind a long buildup with super Cena again if it resulted in that. Have him go a bit heel saying thats left for him to accomplish in the business is ending the streak. That would leave it at 24-0, you need one more. I'd stick Rock in at WM32 for the supermatch feel, then Cena at WM33 for 25-0 with that element of doubt. Yeah, definitely The Rock if available. If not give a younger guy a shot. Still not convinced over the idea of Reigns yet though, as much as I like him that match doesn't interest me... Yet.
|
|