|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Mar 25, 2014 7:24:53 GMT -5
The scan looks really off, but we've seen countless times before that scans will look better in person. It might just be a matter of the angle of the photo. The overall figure looks great though. So if this is just a matter of a head swap then no big deal imo.
If this is a custom, then what head is that and where is that shirt mold from?
|
|
|
|
Post by blu3blazer on Mar 25, 2014 7:26:03 GMT -5
It looks like she has huge traps due to the shirt they put over top the normal Divas mold.
|
|
|
|
Post by junel1216 on Mar 25, 2014 7:35:46 GMT -5
...could always swap heads with the basics or E21
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 16:49:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 25, 2014 7:38:35 GMT -5
Whatever it is, I've got AJ already so I'm good.
|
|
CodebreakerDX
Superstar
Joined on: Dec 23, 2011 14:54:40 GMT -5
Posts: 830
|
Post by CodebreakerDX on Mar 25, 2014 8:06:27 GMT -5
Looks like The Protagonist from Saints Row: The Third/Saints Row IV without facial hair.  |
|
|
|
Post by Chewdeezy on Mar 25, 2014 8:27:55 GMT -5
Head looks small.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 16:49:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 25, 2014 8:33:44 GMT -5
I will stick with her series 24 release in my collection. No need for an update if this is the figure.
|
|
Rob7274
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 3, 2010 5:46:16 GMT -5
Posts: 3,821
|
Post by Rob7274 on Mar 25, 2014 8:46:59 GMT -5
I prefer my basic with Ralphs Loves Bites shirt.
|
|
|
|
Post by poindizzle on Mar 25, 2014 8:48:48 GMT -5
What is it with all these figures recently with heads either too too smalm or enormous? This looks pretty awful. Hopefully its the photograph, but I doubt it. AJ and Kaitlyn are two of my favorite divas of the past year and Mattel did poorly on both. If it's some Barbie doll who can't wrestle, like Alicia Fox, then its a home run, but someone with some skill and it looks like a dude. Kaitlyn is still more swept than this. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 16:49:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 25, 2014 8:49:31 GMT -5
AJs previous scans are probably the worst Mattel has done, so really anything new is refreshing.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 16:49:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 25, 2014 8:50:30 GMT -5
Am I the only one here who likes this scan?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 16:49:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 25, 2014 8:56:36 GMT -5
Sweet jesus...
|
|
|
|
Post by JDSFullmetal on Mar 25, 2014 9:32:06 GMT -5
I guess I'm on the very small who think this figure looks awesome.
|
|
|
|
Post by MrPerfect25 on Mar 25, 2014 9:42:47 GMT -5
I think It's real. New scan that may look better in person. They have had a hard time getting her right. Her basic scans are ok. E21 is awful. This one may or may not look like Janet Jackson.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheChosen1 on Mar 25, 2014 9:59:56 GMT -5
I think the scan is a lot better than Elite 21 but the shoulders and torso just look off
|
|
|
|
Post by Squid: The Anti-Hero on Mar 25, 2014 10:02:47 GMT -5
I think the scan is a lot better than Elite 21 but the shoulders and torso just look off You do realize the scan is exactly the same just with different hair? |
|
|
|
Post by TheChosen1 on Mar 25, 2014 10:13:16 GMT -5
I think the scan is a lot better than Elite 21 but the shoulders and torso just look off You do realize the scan is exactly the same just with different hair? really hmm must be the hair that doesn't make it as bad |
|
|
|
Post by Chewdeezy on Mar 25, 2014 10:55:07 GMT -5
I think the scan is a lot better than Elite 21 but the shoulders and torso just look off You do realize the scan is exactly the same just with different hair? It's not the same scan... This scan is new. |
|
|
|
Post by MrPerfect25 on Mar 25, 2014 11:06:30 GMT -5
This scan is def new
|
|
|
|
Post by Squid: The Anti-Hero on Mar 25, 2014 11:08:21 GMT -5
You do realize the scan is exactly the same just with different hair? It's not the same scan... This scan is new. I'm tellin ya man it's just the hair. It's elite 21 scan with new hair. |
|
