Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 23:29:46 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2014 4:57:27 GMT -5
ITS SO STUPID THAT FANDANGO AND MOJO ROWLEY AND BIG E LANGSTON AREN'T ON THIS POSTER THAT WON'T ACTUALLY BE USED FOR THE REAL SHOW. WHAT THE  WWE YOU'RE SO STUPID. I'M NEVER WATCHING AGAIN UNTIL MONDAY. THIS EXCEPT I'M NOT WATCHING UNTIL WEDNESDAY BECAUSE NXT SAMI ZAYN IS THE FUTURE I CAN'T WAIT FOR KEVIN STEEN TO DEBUT AND THEY'LL HAVE FIVE STAR MATCHES BECAUSE PWG I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY THEY WOULD PUT A MOVIE STAR AND A 91 WCW LEVEL MOVIE STAR AND A UFC STAR ON A TEMPORARY POSTER THAT'S FOR NOTHING MORE THAN GETTING PEOPLE'S ATTENTION UNTIL THE OFFICIAL POSTER. CESARO AND SAMI AND TYLER BREEZE SHOULD BE ON IT, THAT'S HOW TO GET PEOPLE TO NOTICE IT. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 23:29:46 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2014 4:59:03 GMT -5
THIS EXCEPT I'M NOT WATCHING UNTIL WEDNESDAY BECAUSE NXT SAMI ZAYN IS THE FUTURE I CAN'T WAIT FOR KEVIN STEEN TO DEBUT AND THEY'LL HAVE FIVE STAR MATCHES BECAUSE PWG I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY THEY WOULD PUT A MOVIE STAR AND A 91 WCW LEVEL MOVIE STAR AND A UFC STAR ON A TEMPORARY POSTER THAT'S FOR NOTHING MORE THAN GETTING PEOPLE'S ATTENTION UNTIL THE OFFICIAL POSTER. CESARO AND SAMI AND TYLER BREEZE SHOULD BE ON IT, THAT'S HOW TO GET PEOPLE TO NOTICE IT. TYLER BREEZE AND DOLPH ZIGGLER SHOULD BE ON EVERY POSTED OH AND DEAN AMBROSE AND BRAY WYATT AND THE SHIELD EVEN THOUGH I ALREADY SAID AMBROSE AND THEY'RE NOT TOGETHER ANYMORE I ALSO THINK SAMI ZAYN SHOULD BE ON THE COVER OF WWE 2K15 AND ON THE PACKAGING FOR EVERY BOOM ELECTRIFYING WWE FIGURE BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT THE NECKBEARDS WANT |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 23:29:46 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2014 5:45:53 GMT -5
As long as Rock is wrestling, it works for me. I've been hoping to see Brocktista, so I'm not sure where that'd leave Rock unless it's thrice in a lifetime. I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY THEY WOULD PUT A MOVIE STAR AND A 91 WCW LEVEL MOVIE STAR AND A UFC STAR ON A TEMPORARY POSTER THAT'S FOR NOTHING MORE THAN GETTING PEOPLE'S ATTENTION UNTIL THE OFFICIAL POSTER. CESARO AND SAMI AND TYLER BREEZE SHOULD BE ON IT, THAT'S HOW TO GET PEOPLE TO NOTICE IT. TYLER BREEZE AND DOLPH ZIGGLER SHOULD BE ON EVERY POSTED OH AND DEAN AMBROSE AND BRAY WYATT AND THE SHIELD EVEN THOUGH I ALREADY SAID AMBROSE AND THEY'RE NOT TOGETHER ANYMORE I ALSO THINK SAMI ZAYN SHOULD BE ON THE COVER OF WWE 2K15 AND ON THE PACKAGING FOR EVERY BOOM ELECTRIFYING WWE FIGURE BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT THE NECKBEARDS WANT Who the hell is that guy in your sig. |
|
|
|
Post by Mike Giggs' Munchies on Jul 11, 2014 6:26:23 GMT -5
As long as Rock is wrestling, it works for me. I've been hoping to see Brocktista, so I'm not sure where that'd leave Rock unless it's thrice in a lifetime. TYLER BREEZE AND DOLPH ZIGGLER SHOULD BE ON EVERY POSTED OH AND DEAN AMBROSE AND BRAY WYATT AND THE SHIELD EVEN THOUGH I ALREADY SAID AMBROSE AND THEY'RE NOT TOGETHER ANYMORE I ALSO THINK SAMI ZAYN SHOULD BE ON THE COVER OF WWE 2K15 AND ON THE PACKAGING FOR EVERY BOOM ELECTRIFYING WWE FIGURE BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT THE NECKBEARDS WANT Who the hell is that guy in your sig. 31 has to be passing on the rub Brock got from ending the streak. I'm still pissed they ended it and they should at least make sure the payoff is worth it by having him lose to Reigns/Bryan on the biggest stage of them all. Save Brocktista for WM32. In terms of a Rock match I'd love to see Rock-Orton. Rock-HHH could be great too, we'd finally see what should've been the WM16 main event at WM. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 23:29:46 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2014 6:28:13 GMT -5
As long as Rock is wrestling, it works for me. I've been hoping to see Brocktista, so I'm not sure where that'd leave Rock unless it's thrice in a lifetime. Who the hell is that guy in your sig. 31 has to be passing on the rub Brock got from ending the streak. I'm still pissed they ended it and they should at least make sure the payoff is worth it by having him lose to Reigns/Bryan on the biggest stage of them all. Save Brocktista for WM32. In terms of a Rock match I'd love to see Rock-Orton. Rock-HHH could be great too, we'd finally see what should've been the WM16 main event at WM. I don't think Brock should lose for a while. It was a huge deal that he ended the streak so he needs to steamroll through and win for a good long while before losing to someone. Unless he's active as champ from Summerslam-WM. But I somehow doubt that. |
|
|
|
Post by Mike Giggs' Munchies on Jul 11, 2014 6:30:56 GMT -5
31 has to be passing on the rub Brock got from ending the streak. I'm still pissed they ended it and they should at least make sure the payoff is worth it by having him lose to Reigns/Bryan on the biggest stage of them all. Save Brocktista for WM32. In terms of a Rock match I'd love to see Rock-Orton. Rock-HHH could be great too, we'd finally see what should've been the WM16 main event at WM. I don't think Brock should lose for a while. It was a huge deal that he ended the streak so he needs to steamroll through and win for a good long while before losing to someone. Unless he's active as champ from Summerslam-WM. But I somehow doubt that. That would be fine but I don't think I'd want them to wait longer than WM32. My problem with Brocktista then happening at 31 would be that it would be way too telegraphed as a Brock win, and intellectually- disabled if he didn't win. Whereas if they did it after Brock put someone over then it would be a far more intriguing contest imo. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 23:29:46 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2014 6:46:37 GMT -5
I don't think Brock should lose for a while. It was a huge deal that he ended the streak so he needs to steamroll through and win for a good long while before losing to someone. Unless he's active as champ from Summerslam-WM. But I somehow doubt that. That would be fine but I don't think I'd want them to wait longer than WM32. My problem with Brocktista then happening at 31 would be that it would be way too telegraphed as a Brock win, and intellectually- disabled if he didn't win. Whereas if they did it after Brock put someone over then it would be a far more intriguing contest imo. That's true. But I'd like Brock to not lose until at least WM32, they could easily use the MITB as a way to take the belt off of him without him actually losing (say Rollins could cash in mid-match after both men are out and pin Brock's opponent for the win). Batista losing after only having 2 or 3 matches after ending the streak would be a slap in the face for the 21 years that Undertaker was undefeated. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 23:29:46 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2014 6:51:58 GMT -5
As long as Rock is wrestling, it works for me. I've been hoping to see Brocktista, so I'm not sure where that'd leave Rock unless it's thrice in a lifetime. TYLER BREEZE AND DOLPH ZIGGLER SHOULD BE ON EVERY POSTED OH AND DEAN AMBROSE AND BRAY WYATT AND THE SHIELD EVEN THOUGH I ALREADY SAID AMBROSE AND THEY'RE NOT TOGETHER ANYMORE I ALSO THINK SAMI ZAYN SHOULD BE ON THE COVER OF WWE 2K15 AND ON THE PACKAGING FOR EVERY BOOM ELECTRIFYING WWE FIGURE BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT THE NECKBEARDS WANT Who the hell is that guy in your sig. He gives all of us a bad name but god help me I find his videos amusing. |
|
|
|
Post by Mike Giggs' Munchies on Jul 11, 2014 6:55:00 GMT -5
That would be fine but I don't think I'd want them to wait longer than WM32. My problem with Brocktista then happening at 31 would be that it would be way too telegraphed as a Brock win, and intellectually- disabled if he didn't win. Whereas if they did it after Brock put someone over then it would be a far more intriguing contest imo. That's true. But I'd like Brock to not lose until at least WM32, they could easily use the MITB as a way to take the belt off of him without him actually losing (say Rollins could cash in mid-match after both men are out and pin Brock's opponent for the win). Batista losing after only having 2 or 3 matches after ending the streak would be a slap in the face for the 21 years that Undertaker was undefeated. I don't really like the MITB idea. It may not be a proper loss but it would definitely diminish whatever rub Brock has to give over. D'you mean Brock not Batista? I understand that viewpoint but as long as its the right loss (Reigns/Bryan) then I don't mind really. Or well, I do mind because the streak should have never ended, but I won't mind any more than I already do. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 23:29:46 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2014 7:03:49 GMT -5
That's true. But I'd like Brock to not lose until at least WM32, they could easily use the MITB as a way to take the belt off of him without him actually losing (say Rollins could cash in mid-match after both men are out and pin Brock's opponent for the win). Batista losing after only having 2 or 3 matches after ending the streak would be a slap in the face for the 21 years that Undertaker was undefeated. I don't really like the MITB idea. It may not be a proper loss but it would definitely diminish whatever rub Brock has to give over. D'you mean Brock not Batista? I understand that viewpoint but as long as its the right loss (Reigns/Bryan) then I don't mind really. Or well, I do mind because the streak should have never ended, but I won't mind any more than I already do. Yeah I meant Brock not Batista in the second paragraph of my post. I think the MITB thing could create a cool moment that I don't believe has ever happened before. Which I'm all for. I just don't want the streak ending to go to waste. So I guess we'll see how it plays out. As long as Rock is wrestling, it works for me. I've been hoping to see Brocktista, so I'm not sure where that'd leave Rock unless it's thrice in a lifetime. Who the hell is that guy in your sig. He gives all of us a bad name but god help me I find his videos amusing. I got about 5 seconds into one of his videos and had to turn it off lol. |
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Jul 11, 2014 7:04:50 GMT -5
ITS SO STUPID THAT FANDANGO AND MOJO ROWLEY AND BIG E LANGSTON AREN'T ON THIS POSTER THAT WON'T ACTUALLY BE USED FOR THE REAL SHOW. WHAT THE WWE YOU'RE SO STUPID. I'M NEVER WATCHING AGAIN UNTIL MONDAY. Triple Threat main event? Fandango vs. Big E vs. Mojo? |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 23:29:46 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2014 7:34:47 GMT -5
ITS SO STUPID THAT FANDANGO AND MOJO ROWLEY AND BIG E LANGSTON AREN'T ON THIS POSTER THAT WON'T ACTUALLY BE USED FOR THE REAL SHOW. WHAT THE WWE YOU'RE SO STUPID. I'M NEVER WATCHING AGAIN UNTIL MONDAY. Triple Threat main event? Fandango vs. Big E vs. Mojo? If WWE wasn't goofs, but no, WWE has to be goofs and give us goofzillas Brock Lesnar and Batista and such. |
|
|
|
Post by Yambag Jones on Jul 11, 2014 8:00:52 GMT -5
I can see all three of these guys having matches at WM31.
Not a bad placeholder for the eventual Cena poster.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 23:29:46 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2014 8:02:39 GMT -5
It's not fake. Just a 'placeholder'. So yes, pretty much fake. But real. You dig? |
|
|
|
Post by knupmc on Jul 11, 2014 8:27:41 GMT -5
No cena and reigns? Huh. Daniel Bryan will probably main event after is royal rumble win
|
|
|
|
Post by MrPerfect25 on Jul 11, 2014 8:29:15 GMT -5
Please give me Rock/Brock
|
|
Dante, The Voc
Main Eventer
If I'm not online, I'm on the toilet
Joined on: Dec 5, 2010 9:48:02 GMT -5
Posts: 1,374
|
Post by Dante, The Voc on Jul 11, 2014 10:03:40 GMT -5
I'm assuming the background is reference to the San Francisco Earthquake of 1906. Pretty cool.
I hope the stage is all decked out for San Fran. Trolleys and buildings galore.
That logo, however, best have a number in place of that play button. F that.
|
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jul 11, 2014 10:38:51 GMT -5
I thought they always had the next WM logo done when they announce the location?
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Jul 11, 2014 10:41:20 GMT -5
Placeholder poster looks fine, but the WrestleMania logo needs to be changed by the time of the event.Well, that sure as hell ain't going to happen. They had a huge reveal for that logo already... |
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Jul 11, 2014 10:42:30 GMT -5
ITS SO STUPID THAT FANDANGO AND MOJO ROWLEY AND BIG E LANGSTON AREN'T ON THIS POSTER THAT WON'T ACTUALLY BE USED FOR THE REAL SHOW. WHAT THE WWE YOU'RE SO STUPID. I'M NEVER WATCHING AGAIN UNTIL MONDAY. If you're gonna do a parody, at least do it right. Smarks don't give a about Mojo Rawley. |
|
