Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 14:29:59 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2014 13:00:43 GMT -5
"Hogan won't put Cena over" No sh-t. Cena wouldn't be put over by beating Hulk just like the opposite is true as well. Nobody needs to be put over in that match, they're two of the biggest ing stars ever. So was and is Shawn Michaels and Hogan didn't put him over either so Michaels made the match look like a joke by over selling. Same goes for Orton. Guy was the legend killer, only 26, beat every other legend.. Foley, Rock at Mania (didn't pin him but still) Undertaker twice, and a lot more. But nah.. instead of helping out the young guy and boosting him even further in his career.. Hogan has to put himself over.. and of course Orton decides to over sell in that match too so it looks like a joke Orton didn't beat Rock at Mania, he pinned Foley. If you don't take the fall in a tag match, you didn't lose. Your partner did. Also, what does any of that have to do with the point I made that neither Hogan or Cena is put over in that match should it happen? Hogan not losing to HBK is completely understandable. Hogan is Hulk Hogan. He's a huge mainstream star. Shawn Michaels was a "big" star in an era where the business as a whole was down. Why would Hogan lose to him? The Orton match with Hulk still pisses me off. That was one of those great WWE "he gets the rub because he's facing a legend, doesn't need to win!" moments and I ing hate it.
|
|