|
Post by Sleazyness on Aug 24, 2014 16:38:31 GMT -5
The more glaring mistake is the absence of an 'E' .......right now they're 'world wrestling red underline.' . This. I can careless about a part off the WW's missing part of the red line that wasn't noticeable until now. I never understood the absence of the 'E' in the first place.
|
|
|
Post by Flair Forever on Aug 24, 2014 22:45:05 GMT -5
The more glaring mistake is the absence of an 'E' .......right now they're 'world wrestling red underline.' . I always thought that the "E" was formed when the logo is turned sideways..... I thought that was one of the brilliant things about this logo, and the last one too?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 2, 2024 11:23:31 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2014 22:49:24 GMT -5
The more glaring mistake is the absence of an 'E' .......right now they're 'world wrestling red underline.' . I always thought that the "E" was formed when the logo is turned sideways..... I thought that was one of the brilliant things about this logo, and the last one too? Never noticed that and never would have if you never said it. That's amazing and extremely creative
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Aug 24, 2014 23:11:34 GMT -5
It's not 'wrong' and it somewhat insulting to the logo designer for someone to suggest it looks 'unfinished'. They have intentionally removed that section of the line because it creates a desirable void in the area. The white between the w's is the illusion of white space that actually makes logos more appealing. Having it there looks really cluttered and ruins this effect because you'd no longer see nice clean w's but rather you see clear distinct lines that give the logo it's effect and presence. They went to the effort of removing that portion rather than beig lazy and leaving it there. The fact that it is unnoticeable to most means they have done their job right.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 2, 2024 11:23:31 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2014 0:53:10 GMT -5
The more glaring mistake is the absence of an 'E' .......right now they're 'world wrestling red underline.' . I always thought that the "E" was formed when the logo is turned sideways..... I thought that was one of the brilliant things about this logo, and the last one too? Well I learned something today.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 2, 2024 11:23:31 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2014 12:45:19 GMT -5
I still just see it as a big white W with bold black outlines.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 2, 2024 11:23:31 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2014 14:54:03 GMT -5
The more glaring mistake is the absence of an 'E' .......right now they're 'world wrestling red underline.' . I always thought that the "E" was formed when the logo is turned sideways..... I thought that was one of the brilliant things about this logo, and the last one too? i thought of that since they introduced it, but it looks more like two m's turned sideways to me. I guess thoug It could work as a very stylized e too....
|
|
|
Post by Yambag Jones on Aug 25, 2014 14:56:54 GMT -5
I think the actual mistake is the red mark is too high. It's supposed to be lower so that gap doesn't happen.
|
|
|
Post by sitruC on Aug 25, 2014 15:32:28 GMT -5
I look at it as a red tick, followed by a black W with a white W overlaying the prior one, which makes it correct in my eyes.
|
|
|
Post by HVMMONS on Aug 25, 2014 15:57:37 GMT -5
It doesn't take a genius to know that a W turned sideways is an E. What bothers me, is that with the new logo, the red underline is VERY high. In the scratch logo, the red underline was very low. The underline didn't connect with the any part of the "other" W's, or white space. However, in the new logo, the underline DOES connect with the white space. Without the underline coming behind the W into the white space in both sections, the logo looks very unfinished. They're not resembling a clear W in the new logo either. It's essentially just two W's. That's just me being picky. I'll always say the scratch logo > network logo. Some things are better unchanged.
|
|