Deleted
Joined on: May 19, 2024 9:24:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2014 22:47:10 GMT -5
What another horrible halt to a superstar on a roll by WWE. But they've done this before. Tonight was Ambrose's night. Now what happens? He gets put in a midcard feud with Bray Wyatt? Bray Wyatt belongs on Smackdown or Superstars, is a 3rd-tier guy, and should not be anywhere near Rollins and Ambrose. All 3 of them are nowhere near as great as Roman Reigns. He is the future.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 19, 2024 9:24:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2014 22:48:04 GMT -5
and I also knew that WWE wasn't going to let Orton get the final win in their feud. It was too good to be true at the RR. We get Rollins/Orton instead, which is much better and more interesting than Cena/Lesnar.
|
|
|
Post by The Yes Man on Oct 26, 2014 22:48:24 GMT -5
Ugh, I hate being "that guy" but I'm going to have to be. What's bigger or more final then a HiAC? If they just rematch on RAW and get a clean finish, why even bother having the Network? And on top of that it seems like one of WWE's biggest tropes is using interference in current main event programs to kick off new main event programs. Bray Wyatt earlier this with Cena, Rollins with Cena, and now Wyatt with Ambrose. And those are just off the top of my head. We were on our way to a billion star match. It isnt done...because Roman Reigns is gonna beat both of them and be the future.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 19, 2024 9:24:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2014 22:49:08 GMT -5
It isnt done...because Roman Reigns is gonna beat both of them and be the future. Hey. Im just preparing you for what you are gonna be hearing in the WWE for the next couple of years.
|
|
|
Post by The Yes Man on Oct 26, 2014 22:49:57 GMT -5
Hey. Im just preparing you for what you are gonna be hearing in the WWE for the next couple of years.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 19, 2024 9:24:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2014 22:50:42 GMT -5
I mean guys stop Neither Ambrose or Rollins could've afforded a clean loss. Especially in their first big time singles PPV main event. They put on a FANTASTIC match. Rollins looks legit cause he won, Ambrose looks legit because he beat Rollins ass and had to get screwed. And Bray Wyatt just regained a crap load of the momentum that Cena had sucked out of him earlier in the year. That undertaker esq stuff with the hologram was nothing short of BADASS. This is exactly what I call a Win/win/win situation for 3 of the future faces of the company. But yeh. Whine and complain. This, the match was booked as close to perfect as they possibly could've done. Everybody came out looking stronger than before, and Wyatt/Ambrose will lift both guys. They showed us the future tonight, get excited about it!
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Oct 26, 2014 22:50:57 GMT -5
One of the worst PPVs in a LONG time. Nothing delievered. Wyatt interfering in Ambrose/Rollins put a very sour taste in my mouth. Now Ambrose gets to be in a midcard feud with a guy who got destroyed by Cena on multiple occasions.
Great job WWE. You have failed once again.
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Oct 26, 2014 22:51:03 GMT -5
I mean guys stop Neither Ambrose or Rollins could've afforded a clean loss. Especially in their first big time singles PPV main event. They put on a FANTASTIC match. Rollins looks legit cause he won, Ambrose looks legit because he beat Rollins ass and had to get screwed. And Bray Wyatt just regained a crap load of the momentum that Cena had sucked out of him earlier in the year. That undertaker esq stuff with the hologram was nothing short of BADASS. This is exactly what I call a Win/win/win situation for 3 of the future faces of the company. But yeh. Whine and complain. This, the match was booked as close to perfect as they possibly could've done. Everybody came out looking stronger than before, and Wyatt/Ambrose will lift both guys. They showed us the future tonight, get excited about it! Thank you!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 19, 2024 9:24:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2014 22:52:51 GMT -5
One of the worst PPVs in a LONG time. Nothing delievered. Wyatt interfering in Ambrose/Rollins put a very sour taste in my mouth. Now Ambrose gets to be in a midcard feud with a guy who got destroyed by Cena on multiple occasions. Great job WWE. You have failed once again. Yes, because there's no possible way they use this feud to lift both guys and show their strengths. They wrestle similar styles and both cut great promos, and will deliver must see TV, but you're right, they're just doing it to bury Ambrose...
|
|
Chief
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 21, 2008 15:36:44 GMT -5
Posts: 2,849
|
Post by Chief on Oct 26, 2014 22:53:56 GMT -5
You can lose clean in a great match and not lose any momentum. Great matches elevate all involved.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 19, 2024 9:24:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2014 22:54:58 GMT -5
You can lose clean in a great match and not lose any momentum. Great matches elevate all involved. Which this one did, but in this particular feud, a clean loss would hurt the loser.
|
|
Chief
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 21, 2008 15:36:44 GMT -5
Posts: 2,849
|
Post by Chief on Oct 26, 2014 22:59:05 GMT -5
You can lose clean in a great match and not lose any momentum. Great matches elevate all involved. Which this one did, but in this particular feud, a clean loss would hurt the loser. Seth Rollins has been portrayed as a weasel and a coward and they've promoted on commentary that he likes to have people do his dirty work AND he has the MITB briefcase so a loss doesn't hurt him. He will eventually cash in and get the title. Dean Ambrose had his head crushed in and has been harassed by the Authority forever now, so he needed a clean win. A clean win would help him more then a clean loss would hurt Rollins.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 19, 2024 9:24:05 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2014 23:01:02 GMT -5
Rusev is REALLY growing on me.
I am really starting to enjoy him.
|
|
|
Post by ASR (therockisback) on Oct 26, 2014 23:01:06 GMT -5
Overall the PPV was OK but could have been better. Loved the main event but I'm still meh on the ending. That was probably the best HIAC match since Taker/Edge.
Ziggler/Cesaro was good but needed more time, Miz/Sheamus was lame, Tag Titles match was very good imo and Cena/Orton was OK but was also as slow as f***... it didnt really need to be a HIAC match.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 19, 2024 9:24:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2014 23:03:05 GMT -5
Which this one did, but in this particular feud, a clean loss would hurt the loser. Seth Rollins has been portrayed as a weasel and a coward and they've promoted on commentary that he likes to have people do his dirty work AND he has the MITB briefcase so a loss doesn't hurt him. He will eventually cash in and get the title. Dean Ambrose had his head crushed in and has been harassed by the Authority forever now, so he needed a clean win. A clean win would help him more then a clean loss would hurt Rollins. I'm not gonna disagree that it'd help Ambrose more than hurt Rollins, but at the same time, if they have bigger ideas for the feud (I.E Mania buildup to Ambrose getting a clean win), it doesn't hurt either. Rollins has been playing the heel role perfectly, and will play it better now that he has another "victory" over Ambrose. Honestly, there's a million ways they can go with this. At the end of the day, these three are clearly priority for WWE, and that's a good thing.
|
|
Chief
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 21, 2008 15:36:44 GMT -5
Posts: 2,849
|
Post by Chief on Oct 26, 2014 23:03:29 GMT -5
I am pretty high on this PPV too. Enjoyed everything (especially the main event till the ending) and unlike most PPVs, there wasn't that terrible suck the life out of you match (or two).
With that being said, I no longer wanna see Orton vs. Cena, the Usos vs. Dusts, Sheamus vs. Miz, and AJ vs. Paige.
I could stand Cesaro vs. Ziggler for a couple more weeks but after Cesaro lost two straight, I see no point to do it again.
|
|
Chief
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 21, 2008 15:36:44 GMT -5
Posts: 2,849
|
Post by Chief on Oct 26, 2014 23:05:09 GMT -5
Seth Rollins has been portrayed as a weasel and a coward and they've promoted on commentary that he likes to have people do his dirty work AND he has the MITB briefcase so a loss doesn't hurt him. He will eventually cash in and get the title. Dean Ambrose had his head crushed in and has been harassed by the Authority forever now, so he needed a clean win. A clean win would help him more then a clean loss would hurt Rollins. I'm not gonna disagree that it'd help Ambrose more than hurt Rollins, but at the same time, if they have bigger ideas for the feud (I.E Mania buildup to Ambrose getting a clean win), it doesn't hurt either. Rollins has been playing the heel role perfectly, and will play it better now that he has another "victory" over Ambrose. Honestly, there's a million ways they can go with this. At the end of the day, these three are clearly priority for WWE, and that's a good thing. Fair enough. I'll store this in the "let's see where it goes" files. I don't have high hopes but WWE does surprise us once and a while. I think the Shield break-up has worked out well overall.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 19, 2024 9:24:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2014 23:07:53 GMT -5
I'm not gonna disagree that it'd help Ambrose more than hurt Rollins, but at the same time, if they have bigger ideas for the feud (I.E Mania buildup to Ambrose getting a clean win), it doesn't hurt either. Rollins has been playing the heel role perfectly, and will play it better now that he has another "victory" over Ambrose. Honestly, there's a million ways they can go with this. At the end of the day, these three are clearly priority for WWE, and that's a good thing. Fair enough. I'll store this in the "let's see where it goes" files. I don't have high hopes but WWE does surprise us once and a while. I think the Shield break-up has worked out well overall. I'm with you there. I'm hoping Reigns' injury slows his push a bit, but realistically, if all three members of the Shield are fighting for the title by WM 32, I would be more than okay with that.
|
|
|
Post by cordless2016 on Oct 26, 2014 23:08:56 GMT -5
The match quality for the most part was good to great but the outcomes of both hiac matches put a huge damper on the whole event for me. Dean needed the win to finally get his revenge for Seth putting him through hell for 6 months and did t get it. Orton/lesnar would have been something new yet we are now getting cena/brock 5 (going back to 2003) and cena looks to be the one to defeat the one.
The thing is I almost reupped my network subscription after letting it expire a month ago though I had a feeling the wwe wouldn't give us the payoff we wanted. Glad I held off on reupping for now.
|
|
Chief
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 21, 2008 15:36:44 GMT -5
Posts: 2,849
|
Post by Chief on Oct 26, 2014 23:15:20 GMT -5
I'm not down on Reigns like a lot of people are. I think he has plenty of time to grow and he will get better with each passing month. I also think he should win the title at Mania because the WWE are behind him and haven't screwed him up. If they decide to wait on his push, he could end up in that 50/50 booking hell in which he will not get over.
He's a new, fresh face in the main event scene and us fans should not shun that. Plus Rollins is going to be right there with him post Mania and we all know Ambrose won't be far behind.
The people on here !@#$ing on the WWE for planning Brock vs. Reigns for Mania should be thankful they aren't planning Cena vs. Brock, or Cena vs. Orton or Cena vs. Batista or Cena vs. HHH.
Fresh faces and a new guy (even if you don't like him) getting into main events is ALWAYS a good thing because it rarely happens.
|
|