|
|
Post by RKOrton #ThankYouLesnar on Nov 11, 2014 20:27:49 GMT -5
WWE has already made it clear Reigns is there choice for the next top guy in their company. But with the return of Ryback, is Reigns the right guy?
I like Reigns and think he has a bright future but i just don't think he is ready to be the top guy. I feel like the fans would turn on him the more exposed he gets at a main event level. Reigns has a cool look and a nice move set but he is lacking some key things, like mic work and character depth. And some would argue Diesel was the same way. But Diesel had a little bit more charisma than Reigns. Then i look at Ryback, almost a throwback to the early 90s WWE superstar. Since coming back Ryback is better on the mic and the fans still really want to get behind him. ( WWE just seems to always screw it up like they did last monday). I think Ryback could sell a lot of merchandise and make WWE a lot of money. He is more of complete package than Reigns is ,IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Nov 11, 2014 20:37:00 GMT -5
It would've been cool to pick Roman Reigns over Ryback a few years ago because Ryback got the Superman push.
It's cool to pick Ryback over Reigns now because Roman is getting the Superman push.
Both guys have their strengths, I personally have enjoyed Ryback in 2014 more than Reigns, but I feel that Reigns has a much higher ceiling. I choose Reigns.
|
|
BaLoR RoLLiNS
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 18, 2006 1:05:47 GMT -5
Posts: 1,577
|
Post by BaLoR RoLLiNS on Nov 11, 2014 20:56:31 GMT -5
I think Ryback for the here and now. I have always liked Ryback. Let him do his time on top. But in a couple years I'd go with Reigns, Cesaro, Big E. Kind of how we had Triple H, Angle, Rock, Austin, Taker, Big Show, Y2J. We need a solid core for the future
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 3:28:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2014 21:07:47 GMT -5
Reigns. By a  ing mile. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 3:28:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2014 21:11:40 GMT -5
I say both.Why only have just 1 top guy we need a few more top guys new main eventers so I say both.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Nov 11, 2014 21:19:12 GMT -5
Cesaro
Ambrose
Rollins (he'll turn face eventually)
however out of the 2 in question I prefer Ryback over Reigns by a lot
|
|
facemeat
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 24, 2011 0:38:10 GMT -5
Posts: 2,891
|
Post by facemeat on Nov 11, 2014 21:21:52 GMT -5
The Big Guy all the way.  (^Poll results in gif format) |
|
|
|
Post by IRS on Nov 11, 2014 21:23:19 GMT -5
Out of the two, Ryback. But in general, I'm taking Ambrose, Rollins, and Bryan(assuming he does return eventually) over both of them every single ing time. |
|
danielbryanwwe
Superstar
BIGGEST D BRY FAN
Joined on: Feb 1, 2014 15:56:07 GMT -5
Posts: 570 
|
Post by danielbryanwwe on Nov 11, 2014 21:48:51 GMT -5
I feel as if when Ryback had his push people enjoyed his push and we're behind him unlike reigns where people now are not a big fan of his obvious upcoming push.The other shield members have way more talent than reigns does that also takes a toll on his overall ranking I guess you could say.
|
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Nov 11, 2014 21:56:04 GMT -5
Diesel had a lot more charisma than Reigns...
I like Reigns more than Ryback. I don't like either one of them as top guys right now. Ryback has improved but I still don't want to see him shot to the top without a midcard title run, I'm looking at you US Title.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 3:28:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2014 22:21:34 GMT -5
Why can't there be more than two main event guys now a days? Back in the early 2000's you had Rock, Austin, Voldebenoit, Angle, Lesnar, Triple H, Michaels, Booker T, Jericho, Kane, Goldberg, Undertaker, for awhile RVD. The past few years theres only been about 3-4 guys in the main events and that's Orton, Cena, Edge, and Triple H. Mainly Orton and Cena and if they weren't feuding then they'd have guys have small feuds with them. When Miz lost the title that was it. No more main event. It's like they give people the title for awhile and then put them back at the midcard like Ziggler as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Weemanv1 on Nov 11, 2014 22:25:21 GMT -5
Ryback. Always been a fan of his. Though, I like Reigns too and if this was during the time when Ryback was heel and I wasn't as interested with him, I would have picked Reigns.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask of Truth on Nov 11, 2014 22:39:20 GMT -5
Ryback is lacking a forehead, I'll take Reigns for now...  |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 3:28:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2014 22:45:01 GMT -5
There's really no reason to pick either because there can be more then one top guy. I'd prefer Ryback to be an upper mid carder with occasional main event feuds here or there.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 3:28:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2014 23:52:27 GMT -5
Roman Reigns and it's not even remotely close.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 3:28:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2014 23:56:23 GMT -5
Reigns for sure, but i dont want ryback getting buried like he did last time either.
|
|
|
|
Post by Planktung on Nov 12, 2014 0:02:07 GMT -5
As the face of the company? Neither. Who do I like better, though?  |
|
|
|
Post by The Yes Man on Nov 12, 2014 0:48:06 GMT -5
Best choice between these two? The Ryback.
Best choice out of everyone on the roster (not counting Cena)? Daniel Bryan when he returns.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 3:28:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2014 0:50:38 GMT -5
Reigns by far.
|
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Nov 12, 2014 0:55:44 GMT -5
Out of the two, I prefer Ryback. He actually has skill in some aspects.
|
|
