maske2g
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 31, 2011 7:00:54 GMT -5
Posts: 2,972
|
Post by maske2g on Jan 24, 2015 9:18:50 GMT -5
The reasoning is simple. Mattel is not gonna make a figure of a porn star. There's a difference between a sex tape and a porno. Chyna did both. Syxx-Pac did the less offensive one. Hahahahahhaha. Ridiculous.
Sucking Hampton is sucking Hampton whatever you want to label it.
They still sold it for cash.
The quality of the camera and lighting is the only difference.
|
|
|
Post by BadGirlRyleigh on Jan 24, 2015 9:35:39 GMT -5
The reasoning is simple. Mattel is not gonna make a figure of a porn star. There's a difference between a sex tape and a porno. Chyna did both. Syxx-Pac did the less offensive one. Hahahahahhaha. Ridiculous.
Sucking Hampton is sucking Hampton whatever you want to label it.
They still sold it for cash.
The quality of the camera and lighting is the only difference. It doesn't matter what either of us think. It matters what Mattel and WWE think about Chyna. And when you combine the porn and her problems with Steph, it just ain't happening. I'd like to have a Chyna to complete DX, but it ain't happening.
|
|
|
Post by cableV on Jan 24, 2015 10:54:42 GMT -5
The Chyna topic has reached pre-DM Razor and Owen Hart levels of ridiculousness. If it ever happens, it will happen, now stop talking about.
However somewhat off topic, WWE's treatment/recognition of Chyna is interesting. They will use her picture for Throw Back Thursday, Best Body, Every Diva Ever and other pictorials, use her in various Countdown episodes on WWE.com and the Network and she was features in 3 or 4 episodes of the 12 Days of the Attitude Era that was promoted during Raw and Smackdown, but she still doesn't have a Superstar profile page on WWE.com?
It's like they know there is still an interest in her and people like to look back fondly on her in ring career. So they will use that to get clicks on the website and try to get you to buy the network, but they draw the line at a profile page? Weird.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 19, 2024 11:56:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2015 15:21:15 GMT -5
They said they'd never make a scott hall too what was their reasoning for this? Its your flogging a dead horse in the UK.
|
|
|
Post by Roman Bellic on Jan 24, 2015 17:52:40 GMT -5
OP…… ffs
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Jan 24, 2015 18:39:54 GMT -5
You'd think it would be that easy to understand. It is easy to understand. Yet you fail to understand that it is hyprocrytical. I know that porn is frowned upon by the large religious belt in the US of A, like I know that there is a large population are Meth heads just like X PAC, but over the pond we are a bit more forgiving, and we realise that porn is available readily anyway. Make it an exclusive to Europe, where we couldn't care a less if she's had the audacity to have sex on camera. Put it in a 4 pack wit Jeff "Still got a job despite performing on Meth" Hardy, Jimmy Snuka, and Lex Luger. Chyna and X-Pac had a leaked sex tape years ago... But Chyna has done legitimate porn in the past 2-3 years. How is this so hard to understand still?
|
|
jsmith
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Dec 18, 2014 13:40:03 GMT -5
Posts: 135
|
Post by jsmith on Jan 24, 2015 19:01:00 GMT -5
Didn't Mickie James do real porn? They didn't have a problem making her....
Maryse, maybe not porn, but Playboy definately isn't kid friendly
We really need a Chyna figure. She was a HUGE part of the Attitude Era in WWE
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 19, 2024 11:56:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2015 19:15:25 GMT -5
The reasoning is simple. Mattel is not gonna make a figure of a porn star. There's a difference between a sex tape and a porno. Chyna did both. Syxx-Pac did the less offensive one. I guess you're right boss.
|
|
|
Post by cableV on Jan 24, 2015 19:29:29 GMT -5
Didn't Mickie James do real porn? They didn't have a problem making her.... Maryse, maybe not porn, but Playboy definately isn't kid friendly We really need a Chyna figure. She was a HUGE part of the Attitude Era in WWE Not 'real porn' as in any thing on film, but a couple graphic pictorials. Nothing was left to the imagination.
|
|
|
Post by Mox on Jan 24, 2015 19:32:03 GMT -5
OP..........give it a rest zzzzzz, sorry thread police. do you ever post and think, theres 10 seconds I will never get back, but at least I contributed.......nothing. LOL OH MY GOD. I like you.
|
|
jsmith
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Dec 18, 2014 13:40:03 GMT -5
Posts: 135
|
Post by jsmith on Jan 24, 2015 19:33:53 GMT -5
Didn't Mickie James do real porn? They didn't have a problem making her.... Maryse, maybe not porn, but Playboy definately isn't kid friendly We really need a Chyna figure. She was a HUGE part of the Attitude Era in WWE Not 'real porn' as in any thing on film, but a couple graphic pictorials. Nothing was left to the imagination. I swear back in the day she did a real porn. I'm sure someone will look it up. I don't care enough to I know I'd really like it though if Mattel could in any way produce a DX Chyna. Most people I would think don't care about Chynas porn movies or even want to seek them out to watch them
|
|
brianregan09
Superstar
Subscribe to my youtube :)
Joined on: Nov 17, 2010 17:05:22 GMT -5
Posts: 881
|
Post by brianregan09 on Jan 24, 2015 19:38:53 GMT -5
Mickie James did porn and you're all still here arguing over an action figure lol....I'm off
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Jan 24, 2015 20:11:32 GMT -5
Didn't Mickie James do real porn? They didn't have a problem making her.... Maryse, maybe not porn, but Playboy definately isn't kid friendly We really need a Chyna figure. She was a HUGE part of the Attitude Era in WWE Here's the thing I don't get... Bill has said multiple times he'd do a Chyna figure if he could. You're complaining to MDT here but you're never going to get the answer you want. In order to make a Flashback they either need to: (1) be signed to a WWE Legends contract, or (2) get permission both from WWE and from the higher-ups at Mattel to sign her to a contract themselves. At this time, they apparently are not signing ANYONE to new exclusive deals, and only making people that WWE signs. So, yeah, whether it be the porn, the drug history, or toxic image she's had over the past years, it doesn't matter what reason she's not signed... The #1 thing holding her back from being made is WWE giving her a Legends deal. So go complain to them.
|
|
|
Post by BadGirlRyleigh on Jan 24, 2015 21:41:11 GMT -5
Playboy does not count, because WWE had a diva in it every year for half a decade. They probably stopped doing that because of the PG Era and the Mattel deal, but it still happened before.
|
|
jsmith
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Dec 18, 2014 13:40:03 GMT -5
Posts: 135
|
Post by jsmith on Jan 24, 2015 21:54:58 GMT -5
Didn't Mickie James do real porn? They didn't have a problem making her.... Maryse, maybe not porn, but Playboy definately isn't kid friendly We really need a Chyna figure. She was a HUGE part of the Attitude Era in WWE Here's the thing I don't get... Bill has said multiple times he'd do a Chyna figure if he could. You're complaining to MDT here but you're never going to get the answer you want. In order to make a Flashback they either need to: (1) be signed to a WWE Legends contract, or (2) get permission both from WWE and from the higher-ups at Mattel to sign her to a contract themselves. At this time, they apparently are not signing ANYONE to new exclusive deals, and only making people that WWE signs. So, yeah, whether it be the porn, the drug history, or toxic image she's had over the past years, it doesn't matter what reason she's not signed... The #1 thing holding her back from being made is WWE giving her a Legends deal. So go complain to them. Or you can complain on the figure messege board. Just because the designer at Mattel wants to make her doesn't mean Mattel would go out and pursue her, beyond a Legends deal. If they wanted to I'm sure they could. Enough people talking (or constructively complaining might just do that). You never know
|
|
maske2g
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 31, 2011 7:00:54 GMT -5
Posts: 2,972
|
Post by maske2g on Jan 26, 2015 7:11:03 GMT -5
Mickie James did porn and you're all still here arguing over an action figure lol....I'm off Didn't know that!!! Pretty good it is too!!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 19, 2024 11:56:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2015 20:43:47 GMT -5
I so badly want a chyna fifure
|
|
|
Post by Mr Ezekiel Jackson If Ya Nasty on Jan 26, 2015 23:22:03 GMT -5
Here's the thing I don't get... Bill has said multiple times he'd do a Chyna figure if he could. You're complaining to MDT here but you're never going to get the answer you want. In order to make a Flashback they either need to: (1) be signed to a WWE Legends contract, or (2) get permission both from WWE and from the higher-ups at Mattel to sign her to a contract themselves. At this time, they apparently are not signing ANYONE to new exclusive deals, and only making people that WWE signs. So, yeah, whether it be the porn, the drug history, or toxic image she's had over the past years, it doesn't matter what reason she's not signed... The #1 thing holding her back from being made is WWE giving her a Legends deal. So go complain to them. Or you can complain on the figure messege board. Just because the designer at Mattel wants to make her doesn't mean Mattel would go out and pursue her, beyond a Legends deal. If they wanted to I'm sure they could. Enough people talking (or constructively complaining might just do that). You never know Mattel still would have to get the green light from WWE to make the figure as per their deal. MDT gets his marching orders from Mattel and WWE. I'm sure he got a ton of folks he wants to make but can't because they say no. There's a reason why we haven't got Mike Tyson even though he's in the WWE Hall of Fame.
|
|
jsmith
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Dec 18, 2014 13:40:03 GMT -5
Posts: 135
|
Post by jsmith on Jan 27, 2015 0:02:21 GMT -5
Or you can complain on the figure messege board. Just because the designer at Mattel wants to make her doesn't mean Mattel would go out and pursue her, beyond a Legends deal. If they wanted to I'm sure they could. Enough people talking (or constructively complaining might just do that). You never know Mattel still would have to get the green light from WWE to make the figure as per their deal. MDT gets his marching orders from Mattel and WWE. I'm sure he got a ton of folks he wants to make but can't because they say no. There's a reason why we haven't got Mike Tyson even though he's in the WWE Hall of Fame. So you're saying the WWE is blocking Mattel from putting a Mike Tyson figure out? Someone they just put in their HOF not long ago? That's kind of hard to believe, but I guess you never know... They let Jakks make every jobber and nobody seemingly ever on TV. Things must have changed with their action figure approval system
|
|
|
Post by Mr Ezekiel Jackson If Ya Nasty on Jan 27, 2015 0:11:45 GMT -5
Mattel still would have to get the green light from WWE to make the figure as per their deal. MDT gets his marching orders from Mattel and WWE. I'm sure he got a ton of folks he wants to make but can't because they say no. There's a reason why we haven't got Mike Tyson even though he's in the WWE Hall of Fame. So you're saying the WWE is blocking Mattel from putting a Mike Tyson figure out? Someone they just put in their HOF not long ago? That's kind of hard to believe, but I guess you never know... They let Jakks make every jobber and nobody seemingly ever on TV. Things must have changed with their action figure approval system I'm saying is that Mattel is not comfortable making an action figure of a convicted rapist. Someone getting an action figure in the WWE line requires both Mattel and WWE to sign off on it. Jakks worked out deals with folks without WWE approval due to how their contract with WWF was structured. They did Bruno even though WWF and him were beeefing at the time. When Mattel made him, WWE and Bruno were working with each other.
|
|