TheRockers
Superstar
Joined on: Mar 21, 2006 11:20:31 GMT -5
Posts: 710
|
Post by TheRockers on Jan 28, 2015 21:50:58 GMT -5
Also got shipping confirmation. I'm excited to get this Undertaker. Looks great.
|
|
|
Post by POOR-ly Cuyler on Jan 28, 2015 22:19:50 GMT -5
Guess ill have to make a tie. Im just excited that I can replace the WM heritage basic and my grey glove custom basic
|
|
jsmith
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Dec 18, 2014 13:40:03 GMT -5
Posts: 135
|
Post by jsmith on Jan 28, 2015 22:35:35 GMT -5
Did he have the forearm tat when he debuted? Or did the EG have it? Didn't realize he didn't wear the tie at first. Even his first Mania? Makes it easier for me to come to terms with buying this thing. WrestleMania VII - 0:45 seconds in this clip, you'll see he's wearing a tie. Thank you for this video Definitely wanting this Taker more and more now. I'll just do awY with coat and hat and he will be in his in ring gear But this video makes me want to be able to go buy the DAMN Mattel BAF Paul Bearer that much more!!!
|
|
|
Post by qdogg on Jan 28, 2015 23:57:42 GMT -5
He always wore a grey tie early in his career it then went to purple. That statement is false that he didn't wear it sometimes. I'm still getting it though.
|
|
thelostweekend
Superstar
Joined on: Jan 22, 2013 19:51:27 GMT -5
Posts: 659
|
Post by thelostweekend on Jan 29, 2015 0:04:44 GMT -5
Beautiful figures, though I'm waiting, since last year's set is still heavily stocked in certain stores around here.
|
|
|
Post by cmiller79 on Jan 29, 2015 5:51:49 GMT -5
Both look sweet but I'll take my chances finding these in stores
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 10, 2024 5:49:12 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2015 6:37:02 GMT -5
This year's missing tie = last year's missing belly hair...
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 10, 2024 5:49:12 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2015 8:00:12 GMT -5
This year's missing tie = last year's missing belly hair... The tie or no tie, that is the question.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 10, 2024 5:49:12 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2015 12:40:05 GMT -5
A bit pricey in my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by LostHawk05 on Jan 29, 2015 12:42:30 GMT -5
Hope these hit Amazon soon or I'm going to cave and overpay.
|
|
jsmith
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Dec 18, 2014 13:40:03 GMT -5
Posts: 135
|
Post by jsmith on Jan 29, 2015 14:03:08 GMT -5
Mattel WWE WrestleMania 31 Elite in stock now at RINGSIDE! CLICK HERE to Order Now!*** Use coupon code WFIGS for 10% off! ***Mattel WWE WrestleMania 31 Elite includes Undertaker and Kane. Could you possibly post a picture of the back of the boxes for Taker and Kane?
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Jan 29, 2015 14:58:59 GMT -5
regardless of when he wore the tie....he wore it A LOT during his early career entrances...which this figure is in ENTRANCE attire. it should have had the tie. a tiny piece of cloth couldnt cost THAT much for a "premium" figure
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Jan 29, 2015 15:06:24 GMT -5
regardless of when he wore the tie....he wore it A LOT during his early career entrances...which this figure is in ENTRANCE attire. it should have had the tie. a tiny piece of cloth couldnt cost THAT much for a "premium" figure Just noticed even the pic on the box has the tie on Good grief
|
|
|
Post by mikey1974 on Jan 29, 2015 15:19:02 GMT -5
Sweet. Now how long before a post with a missing tie comment? It's accurate. Taker didn't always wear a tie earlier in his career. Awesome to see they are in stock but I ordered mine with Razor so hopefully he's in stock soon. I have never once seen Taker with the coat and hat on,but not the tie. only time I've ever seen him appear without the tie, he also was missing the rest of his entrance gear,such as Royal Rumble matches and Funeral Parlor attacks. so if they were going to include his entrance gear,they should've included ALL his gear, so you can do it properly. "Real" debut match,as Kane The Undertaker, couple days before survivor series, but shown on TV afterwards: official Survivor Series debut: December 1990 (note he still had the black gloves): WrestleMania VII: vs Ultimate Warrior, Taker and Jake Roberts vs Warrior promo: Taker and Roberts crashing Macho Man and Elizabeth's reception: Taker vs Hogan, Survivor Series 1991:
|
|
worldwarhulk
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Jan 10, 2015 16:32:43 GMT -5
Posts: 284
|
Post by worldwarhulk on Jan 29, 2015 22:12:10 GMT -5
At first I was really looking forward to that taker. But in the end, I think there's just too many details that bother me about this figure. The face looks kinda fat, the beard just doesn't look right. Like it shouldn't have been painted so solid looking. The lack of a tie is a bummer. I think I'll just have to wait for the next attempt at the grey gloved undertaker. Oh well.
|
|
|
Post by Chewdeezy on Jan 29, 2015 22:43:30 GMT -5
Hoping for a future Battle Pack, Undertaker and Paul Bearer with a tie as an accessory.
|
|
DestroyerOfNations
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Nov 29, 2011 18:39:50 GMT -5
Posts: 2,855
|
Post by DestroyerOfNations on Jan 30, 2015 14:00:54 GMT -5
Just got these guys in the mail. Pictures taken from my phone so sorry if they're not great quality.
I thought this was pretty cool. They fixed the missing paint under Kane's arm.
Also, Taker has some purple under his eyes which I didn't notice in the proto pictures. I gotta say, even missing the tie, these are two solid figures. The new design for Kane's mask really sticks out and looks 10x better than the basic version of this attire. If anyone wants comparison pictures or more of these two let me know.
|
|
|
Post by Mongo Bears on Jan 30, 2015 14:07:06 GMT -5
Just got these guys in the mail. Pictures taken from my phone so sorry if they're not great quality. I thought this was pretty cool. They fixed the missing paint under Kane's arm. Also, Taker has some purple under his eyes which I didn't notice in the proto pictures. I gotta say, even missing the tie, these are two solid figures. The new design for Kane's mask really sticks out and looks 10x better than the basic version of this attire. If anyone wants comparison pictures or more of these two let me know. It says kane is 6' 1" ?
|
|
DestroyerOfNations
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Nov 29, 2011 18:39:50 GMT -5
Posts: 2,855
|
Post by DestroyerOfNations on Jan 30, 2015 14:15:01 GMT -5
Yep
|
|
|
Post by Mongo Bears on Jan 30, 2015 14:33:57 GMT -5
They are so sloppy Kane looks good actually, but I mean...how many times was it wrong before it was right? The undertaker figure could've used some detail work but it seems they never touched it since ringside fest.
|
|