Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 13:29:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2015 14:50:57 GMT -5
Any chance he retains and then loses via a cash in on Raw?
That could allow Reigns to chase Rollins until Summerslam or are we 100% locked in to a Reigns win at Mania?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 13:29:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2015 14:58:25 GMT -5
Good, he'll destroy Reigns, and Rollins will cash in
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 13:29:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2015 15:33:32 GMT -5
They're gonna set up Brock vs. Rock at WM32.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 13:29:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2015 15:43:16 GMT -5
It's so 'Taker can Tombstone his arse out of the company.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 13:29:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2015 15:53:40 GMT -5
Maybe he'll shoot on WWE's sponsors like he did UFC.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 13:29:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2015 16:49:10 GMT -5
They're gonna set up Brock vs. Rock at WM32. i hope so.
|
|
|
Post by IRS on Mar 6, 2015 17:05:23 GMT -5
Please let him win, and have Seth cash-in on RAW.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 13:29:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2015 17:52:59 GMT -5
In my opinion, I've been sure of a Brock win for a while now. My thoughts were a cash-in after the match for Seth to *believably* be able to beat Brock from his tough match, and it would be a great send home. The cash-in on Raw theory also makes good sense with my thoughts though.
|
|
|
Post by BROKEN on Mar 6, 2015 20:02:40 GMT -5
I honestly want Seth's cash in to fail and roman keep belt if he wins
|
|
Dante, The Voc
Main Eventer
If I'm not online, I'm on the toilet
Joined on: Dec 5, 2010 9:48:02 GMT -5
Posts: 1,374
|
Post by Dante, The Voc on Mar 6, 2015 20:06:21 GMT -5
Please let him win, and have Seth cash-in on RAW. I can't like this post enough. Only way you'll avoid fan backlash at 'Mania. Other scenario is Reigns wins at WM, get chewed out and spit up by the crowd during his first promo as champ on Raw, Lesnar comes out + annihilates him, flips the bird and leaves, allowing Rollins easy pickings for the belt.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 13:29:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2015 6:19:31 GMT -5
Rollins as a strong heel champ(HHH 2000 era) offers way more possibilities and scenarios for WWE.
Bryan, Ambrose, Sheamus(if he returns as a face), Reigns and Cena all await in the wings.......
|
|
|
Post by Kyle - legendkilla2k9 on Mar 7, 2015 7:39:24 GMT -5
They are 100% set on Reigns winning it. Case closed.
If they want to go down the road of having Reigns beat Lesnar under a crowd chanting 'CM Punk' we should let em.
|
|
|
Post by cordless2016 on Mar 8, 2015 10:05:16 GMT -5
It makes absolutely no sense to have Brock win only for Seth to cash in and Brock is then gone forever. They've built up Brock so much that Reigns defeating him (convincingly, not with just a punch and spear) will make give him a ton of credibility in the eyes of the fans. Say he loses, doesn't benefit him at all. Say Seth cashes in on Brock, only makes him look like another stereotypical cowardly heel. In this instance nobody benefits from Brock's dominant push and then Brock is gone.
With there backs to a corner the simple answer is to have reigns win and Seth will eventually cash in on him.
|
|
|
Post by McBlake on Mar 8, 2015 10:16:21 GMT -5
It makes absolutely no sense to have Brock win only for Seth to cash in and Brock is then gone forever. They've built up Brock so much that Reigns defeating him (convincingly, not with just a punch and spear) will make give him a ton of credibility in the eyes of the fans. Say he loses, doesn't benefit him at all. Say Seth cashes in on Brock, only makes him look like another stereotypical cowardly heel. In this instance nobody benefits from Brock's dominant push and then Brock is gone. With there backs to a corner the simple answer is to have reigns win and Seth will eventually cash in on him. Exactly this. I've said it multiple times before but having Brock lose it any way other than cleanly defeats the purpose of ending the streak and the astronomical build he has been given. Someone has to gain from it all.
|
|
|
Post by skribbel24 on Mar 9, 2015 0:39:13 GMT -5
The MITB contract will expire on April 6, so technically Seth CAN still cash in at the RAW event after WM. This will be awesome.
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of 45 and 47! on Mar 9, 2015 2:32:42 GMT -5
The MITB contract will expire on April 6, so technically Seth CAN still cash in at the RAW event after WM. This will be awesome. Its good for a year so he has until June 29th 2015 to cash it in.
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Mar 9, 2015 12:23:40 GMT -5
I genuinely don't know how you write Brock off TV if you're bringing him back the night after Mania. If Seth takes the title from him then the story is open ended. So the only situation I see is that Reigns goes over Brock at Mania, Brock gets a rematch the next night on Raw and gets DQd but destroys Reigns. Out comes Rollins. So then Heyman joins the Authority, but really more specifically Rollins. Brock's final act is him serving as a mercenary for the Authority and then he's gone.
I don't know that any of that makes any sense either though. If you want to finish the story you've spent a year telling, you let Reigns go over Brock clean at Mania and then we never hear from Brock again. Him showing up the next night leads me to believe Reigns isn't overcoming sh*t. That still poses the issue of fans booing the living sh*t out of Reigns winning the title. I don't really see a situation where Brock retains at Mania unless Rollins comes out right away to cash-in.
I don't know.
|
|
|
Post by Yambag Jones on Mar 9, 2015 15:51:08 GMT -5
I'd still have Rollins cash in mid match during the WM31 main event. He NEEDS to cash in the most dastardly way possible, otherwise the crowd will cheer like crazy for the biggest heel in the company.
If he cashes in the night after (regardless of who won the night before), the crowd will cheer.
I was at Night of Champions and when he addressed the crowd during the show the crowd hated him. When he attempted to cash in during the main event, the crowd lost their mind because they wanted to see a successful cash in. WWE needs to handle this delicately. An ideal situation would be if he took the title away from Bryan, Ziggler, Ambrose, or anyone the crowd loved.
|
|
|
Post by JC Motors on Mar 9, 2015 16:02:14 GMT -5
Brock just needs to drop the title
|
|
|
Post by Duck Holliday on Mar 10, 2015 4:13:53 GMT -5
Any chance he retains and then loses via a cash in on Raw? That could allow Reigns to chase Rollins until Summerslam or are we 100% locked in to a Reigns win at Mania? I think we are pretty much locked in for the Reigns win at Mania, but I think your suggestion is more interesting and more exciting.
|
|