bab2781
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Mar 11, 2015 13:07:36 GMT -5
Posts: 139
|
Post by bab2781 on Mar 21, 2015 8:25:51 GMT -5
#1.Austin/Punk #2.Taker/Sting #3.Rock/Brock #4.Bryan/Angle
|
|
|
Post by The Future on Mar 21, 2015 8:28:10 GMT -5
HBK/Bryan. Rollins/Ambrose with some kind of crazy stipulation.
|
|
|
Post by iamkrang on Mar 21, 2015 8:28:46 GMT -5
Id add Triple Threat for the WWE Title: Reigns vs Rollins vs Ambrose
I'm trying to think of a high profile Cena opponent
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 6, 2024 2:32:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2015 8:34:17 GMT -5
HBK/Bryan. Rollins/Ambrose with some kind of crazy stipulation.It'd be awesome but wouldn't help in Mania selling out.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Mar 21, 2015 8:39:39 GMT -5
It's WrestleMania. It sells itself for the most part.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 6, 2024 2:32:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2015 8:41:09 GMT -5
^.
But, matches I'd love to see at Mania 32..
Michaels/Bryan Lesnar/Orton Rollins/Reigns/Ambrose
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 6, 2024 2:32:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2015 8:41:32 GMT -5
Id add Triple Threat for the WWE Title: Reigns vs Rollins vs Ambrose I'm trying to think of a high profile Cena opponent Undertaker?
|
|
|
Post by The Future on Mar 21, 2015 8:42:25 GMT -5
HBK/Bryan. Rollins/Ambrose with some kind of crazy stipulation.It'd be awesome but wouldn't help in Mania selling out. Their feud didn't make people mark at Hell in a Cell? They weren't one of the selling points of the late Spring/Summer? I remember them basically headlining RAWs and PPVs for months. They're fresh. They're new. This is young blood rising to the top. This is the ladder match with the Rock/HHH. This is Foley vs. Taker for the first time. Just because it's a match that doesn't have part timers or really old dudes past their prime doesn't mean it won't put asses in seats. People will absolutely buy the show and show up just to see these two (who have the best chemistry of any two in the WWE right now) work with each other and have it culminate at the biggest show of the year.
|
|
|
Post by The Future on Mar 21, 2015 8:43:00 GMT -5
Id add Triple Threat for the WWE Title: Reigns vs Rollins vs Ambrose I'm trying to think of a high profile Cena opponent Lex Luthor.
|
|
Miztery
Superstar
Joined on: Dec 30, 2014 0:16:59 GMT -5
Posts: 892
|
Post by Miztery on Mar 21, 2015 8:45:25 GMT -5
I wouldn't mind seeing Cena and Angle go at it again.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 6, 2024 2:32:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2015 8:48:16 GMT -5
It'd be awesome but wouldn't help in Mania selling out. Their feud didn't make people mark at Hell in a Cell? They weren't one of the selling points of the late Spring/Summer? I remember them basically headlining RAWs and PPVs for months. They're fresh. They're new. This is young blood rising to the top. This is the ladder match with the Rock/HHH. This is Foley vs. Taker for the first time. Just because it's a match that doesn't have part timers or really old dudes past their prime doesn't mean it won't put asses in seats. People will absolutely buy the show and show up just to see these two (who have the best chemistry of any two in the WWE right now) work with each other and have it culminate at the biggest show of the year. The difference is that was Hell in a Cell, this is WrestleMania, where people are complaining a card with Undertaker, Triple H, Sting, Brock Lesnar and John Cena looks weak. A niche crowd of around 50,000 will always be drawed to WrestleMania but they really need a very strong card to put it over the top.
|
|
|
Post by BROKEN on Mar 21, 2015 8:51:06 GMT -5
Can shawn and austin wrestle anymore?
Love to see
Ambrose vs Foley in hardcore match Brock vs Batista Taker vs Sting
|
|
|
Post by The Future on Mar 21, 2015 8:53:35 GMT -5
Their feud didn't make people mark at Hell in a Cell? They weren't one of the selling points of the late Spring/Summer? I remember them basically headlining RAWs and PPVs for months. They're fresh. They're new. This is young blood rising to the top. This is the ladder match with the Rock/HHH. This is Foley vs. Taker for the first time. Just because it's a match that doesn't have part timers or really old dudes past their prime doesn't mean it won't put asses in seats. People will absolutely buy the show and show up just to see these two (who have the best chemistry of any two in the WWE right now) work with each other and have it culminate at the biggest show of the year. The difference is that was Hell in a Cell, this is WrestleMania, where people are complaining a card with Undertaker, Triple H, Sting, Brock Lesnar and John Cena looks weak. A niche crowd of around 50,000 will always be drawed to WrestleMania but they really need a very strong card to put it over the top. I don't think we need to pull every star ever out of retirement just for a good card. Fans might wanna see Hogan or Flair in a match, but the workrate would be terrible. Give them segments. Give Dean and Seth a MATCH. They're two of the best doing it today. Hell, if you even wanna bring a name like Jericho or Angle back, awesome. Just put them with someone they can put on a classic match with. WM moments are made in the ring. That's why matches like Goldberg vs Lesnar were paper lions.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 6, 2024 2:32:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2015 8:57:45 GMT -5
The difference is that was Hell in a Cell, this is WrestleMania, where people are complaining a card with Undertaker, Triple H, Sting, Brock Lesnar and John Cena looks weak. A niche crowd of around 50,000 will always be drawed to WrestleMania but they really need a very strong card to put it over the top. I don't think we need to pull every star ever out of retirement just for a good card. Fans might wanna see Hogan or Flair in a match, but the workrate would be terrible. Give them segments. Give Dean and Seth a MATCH. They're two of the best doing it today. Hell, if you even wanna bring a name like Jericho or Angle back, awesome. Just put them with someone they can put on a classic match with. WM moments are made in the ring. That's why matches like Goldberg vs Lesnar were paper lions. Dear lord no, I would never want to see Hogan or Flair wrestle again, let alone at WrestleMania. WrestleMania 32 should be built up with stars like The Rock, Steve Austin, Undertaker, John Cena, Sting, Triple H etc. because that's what will bring crowds and will help WWE achieve their goal of breaking records for attendance. Young stars are important part of WrestleMania but you can't build a WrestleMania in 2016 around those two.
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Mar 21, 2015 9:02:41 GMT -5
Id add Triple Threat for the WWE Title: Reigns vs Rollins vs Ambrose I'm trying to think of a high profile Cena opponentBalor/Owens/Zayn, anyone one of them would have a great match with Cena
|
|
|
Post by The Future on Mar 21, 2015 9:07:12 GMT -5
I don't think we need to pull every star ever out of retirement just for a good card. Fans might wanna see Hogan or Flair in a match, but the workrate would be terrible. Give them segments. Give Dean and Seth a MATCH. They're two of the best doing it today. Hell, if you even wanna bring a name like Jericho or Angle back, awesome. Just put them with someone they can put on a classic match with. WM moments are made in the ring. That's why matches like Goldberg vs Lesnar were paper lions. Dear lord no, I would never want to see Hogan or Flair wrestle again, let alone at WrestleMania. WrestleMania 32 should be built up with stars like The Rock, Steve Austin, Undertaker, John Cena, Sting, Triple H etc. because that's what will bring crowds and will help WWE achieve their goal of breaking records for attendance. Young stars are important part of WrestleMania but you can't build a WrestleMania in 2016 around those two. That's why I was saying it's a supporting match that will support spots on the card above it. If the show already has Austin vs. Punk, Rock vs. Brock, Sting vs. Taker, why am I trying to bring in any other old-timers? I wanna see WWE build up WHO THEY HAVE ON THE ROSTER NOW into huge, meaningful feuds and blow offs at WM. You know, like they did with Austin vs. Rock or HBK's myriad matches. If the only way they can sell a match at WM is to bring in a part-timer or someone out of retirement, that's sad, and eventually they're gonna run out of old guys to use. That's why I think Sting vs. Taker will be poor. Noone knows if Austin even could come back. Sure, we want to see some of these matches, but if they're limited, hot garbage without proper build (like everyone has been complaining about because the one-sided feuds with part timers make the build all on one guy) then we're left with the feeling of WM XXXI. What 'great match' on the card do we have featuring current roster members besides the IC Ladder match?
|
|
|
Post by bigshab421 on Mar 21, 2015 9:07:49 GMT -5
Austin v. Cena Taker v. Sting Reigns v. Ambrose v. Rollins (WWE Title) Lesnar v. Rock Bryan v. Owens HHH v. Ziggler Orton v. Wyatt ATGMBR III
Book that for WrestleMania and you have the best one of all time
|
|
|
Post by The Future on Mar 21, 2015 9:08:46 GMT -5
Id add Triple Threat for the WWE Title: Reigns vs Rollins vs Ambrose I'm trying to think of a high profile Cena opponentBalor/Owens/Zayn, anyone one of them would have a great match with Cena Owens/Cena would be an awesome match, following Cena's trend of taking on the 'hot upstart' of the year at Mania, but none of those guys are high profile with the general viewing audience just yet. I think they could be if WWE put real effort into them beforehand, though. Think Kurt Angle's one year meteoric rise. Imagine we were given that with Balor or Owens?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 6, 2024 2:32:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2015 9:12:12 GMT -5
Dear lord no, I would never want to see Hogan or Flair wrestle again, let alone at WrestleMania. WrestleMania 32 should be built up with stars like The Rock, Steve Austin, Undertaker, John Cena, Sting, Triple H etc. because that's what will bring crowds and will help WWE achieve their goal of breaking records for attendance. Young stars are important part of WrestleMania but you can't build a WrestleMania in 2016 around those two. That's why I was saying it's a supporting match that will support spots on the card above it. If the show already has Austin vs. Punk, Rock vs. Brock, Sting vs. Taker, why am I trying to bring in any other old-timers? I wanna see WWE build up WHO THEY HAVE ON THE ROSTER NOW into huge, meaningful feuds and blow offs at WM. You know, like they did with Austin vs. Rock or HBK's myriad matches. If the only way they can sell a match at WM is to bring in a part-timer or someone out of retirement, that's sad, and eventually they're gonna run out of old guys to use. That's why I think Sting vs. Taker will be poor. Noone knows if Austin even could come back. Sure, we want to see some of these matches, but if they're limited, hot garbage without proper build (like everyone has been complaining about because the one-sided feuds with part timers make the build all on one guy) then we're left with the feeling of WM XXXI. What 'great match' on the card do we have featuring current roster members besides the IC Ladder match? WrestleMania still being built on guys from years ago is sad. There's only one or two guys on the current roster which could be used in the Main Event of WrestleMania and not seem like a second thought. It's not just about the WWE though. The fans have gotten very stubborn over the years and if the favourite wrestler they have doesn't get pushed they're likely to not respond positively even if the product provided is great. See Roman Reigns vs Daniel Bryan at Fast Lane. The match ruled but many people discredited it because they had an agenda before the match that Roman Reigns sucked and couldn't put on a good match, and continued with that attitude even after that good showing. Both WWE and the fans nowadays are very stubborn. The fans have their stuck favourites of which they always want to Main Event WrestleMania, be at the end of the intro package and have the most crappy merchandise made per year, the WWE have their own too. WWE is the organisation and the fans should really realise that it's their choice who they push, it's their choice to make a mistake if it happens, and their choice to succeed if it does so like they hope it will.
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Mar 21, 2015 9:16:08 GMT -5
Balor/Owens/Zayn, anyone one of them would have a great match with Cena Owens/Cena would be an awesome match, following Cena's trend of taking on the 'hot upstart' of the year at Mania, but none of those guys are high profile with the general viewing audience just yet. I think they could be if WWE put real effort into them beforehand, though. Think Kurt Angle's one year meteoric rise. Imagine we were given that with Balor or Owens? True but neither was Rusev, all we'd seen of him in wwe this time last year was about 5 mins in the Rumble
|
|