Deleted
Joined on: Oct 31, 2024 19:12:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2015 14:43:31 GMT -5
I don't hate him. He's a legend that was revolutionary to the business. But his time has passed, and he just can't accept it. He still wants the spotlight to be on him, and it's wrong. You could honestly say the same thing for many other superstars who are loved endlessly. Hulk is the reason wresting got huge. He deserves a retirement match at WrestleMania, no if and's or but's about it. And that's your view, and you're perfectly entitled to have it. But I don't agree, and I'm sure many others don't as well. WrestleMania needs to be the platform for new stars to be created, not for Legends who want one more match.
|
|
|
Post by attitudesback on May 1, 2015 14:43:36 GMT -5
Well Hogan I'm pretty sure we could.
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on May 1, 2015 14:43:37 GMT -5
I don't hate him. He's a legend that was revolutionary to the business. But his time has passed, and he just can't accept it. He still wants the spotlight to be on him, and it's wrong. You could honestly say the same thing for many other superstars who are loved endlessly. Hulk is the reason wresting got huge. He deserves a retirement match at WrestleMania, no if and's or but's about it. Then maybe he should have spent his last dying breaths as in-ring performer setting up a retirement match in WWE. You know, instead of running off to TNA in an effort to prove one last time that Hulkamania was bigger than WWE. Hogan not getting a quality retirement match is on Hogan. It's time for him and his fans to stop hanging on by a thread. It's embarrassing. The guy is a dinosaur and WWE is already using him to the best of his ability. SILVERDOME BROTHER!!
|
|
|
Post by attitudesback on May 1, 2015 14:46:17 GMT -5
It's well known of Hogan's antics and his opinion towards himself. The "hate" is justified and I'll be the first to admit when I started reading about Hogan's WCW antics I was shocked that "The Immortal" would act in such a way. It's not the topic of this thread, but it is justified. - I don't think he'll magically improve from his TNA work either. He's still the same old man that tried to wrestle to "improve" TNA.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 31, 2024 19:12:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2015 14:47:01 GMT -5
If he can, let him. If not, don't.
|
|
|
Post by Chip on May 1, 2015 14:47:23 GMT -5
nWo vs DX
Hogan/Hall/Nash vs Outlaws & X-Pac
short, sweet, simple.
|
|
|
Post by Scarlet Begonias on May 1, 2015 14:55:42 GMT -5
If he can, let him. If not, don't.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on May 1, 2015 14:58:54 GMT -5
You could honestly say the same thing for many other superstars who are loved endlessly. Hulk is the reason wresting got huge. He deserves a retirement match at WrestleMania, no if and's or but's about it. Then maybe he should have spent his last dying breaths as in-ring performer setting up a retirement match in WWE. You know, instead of running off to TNA in an effort to prove one last time that Hulkamania was bigger than WWE. Hogan not getting a quality retirement match is on Hogan. It's time for him and his fans to stop hanging on by a thread. It's embarrassing. The guy is a dinosaur and WWE is already using him to the best of his ability. SILVERDOME BROTHER!! Scarlet Begonias this guy hit the nail on the head. I understand how important Hulk Hogan is to wrestling history, but to see him in the ring in 2015 is something I would pay to avoid.
|
|
|
Post by Scarlet Begonias on May 1, 2015 15:00:33 GMT -5
You could honestly say the same thing for many other superstars who are loved endlessly. Hulk is the reason wresting got huge. He deserves a retirement match at WrestleMania, no if and's or but's about it. And that's your view, and you're perfectly entitled to have it. But I don't agree, and I'm sure many others don't as well. WrestleMania needs to be the platform for new stars to be created, not for Legends who want one more match. I love a good banter. I also agree WM should be the platform for new stars to be born,but, for new stars to be born you need them to one up and look better than the stars that came before them. Example: Nobody gave a crapabout Randy Orton until he started taking out legends.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 31, 2024 19:12:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2015 15:03:11 GMT -5
And that's your view, and you're perfectly entitled to have it. But I don't agree, and I'm sure many others don't as well. WrestleMania needs to be the platform for new stars to be created, not for Legends who want one more match. I love a good banter. I also agree WM should be the platform for new stars to be born,but, for new stars to be born you need them to one up and look better than the stars that came before them. Example: Nobody gave a crap about Randy Orton until he started taking out legends. Very true. I got into wrestling in 2004, just as Orton was on the rise. His feud with Foley did wonders for his career.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 31, 2024 19:12:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2015 15:09:12 GMT -5
Hogan vs. Heath Slater in a "RAW 1000" match.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 31, 2024 19:12:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2015 15:15:29 GMT -5
I like Hulk Hogan.
|
|
|
Post by The Yes Man on May 1, 2015 15:21:29 GMT -5
I don't hate him. He's a legend that was revolutionary to the business. But his time has passed, and he just can't accept it. He still wants the spotlight to be on him, and it's wrong. You could honestly say the same thing for many other superstars who are loved endlessly. Hulk is the reason wresting got huge. He deserves a retirement match at WrestleMania, no if and's or but's about it. He's had that chance, not WWE's fault he went to TNA and wasted his last match there.
|
|
|
Post by Slim on May 1, 2015 15:32:24 GMT -5
I don't think he can put on a good match alone right now, so I think that a tag match could be cool, NWO vs DX for example
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 31, 2024 19:12:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2015 15:34:26 GMT -5
I don't hate him. He's a legend that was revolutionary to the business. But his time has passed, and he just can't accept it. He still wants the spotlight to be on him, and it's wrong. You could honestly say the same thing for many other superstars who are loved endlessly. Hulk is the reason wresting got huge. He deserves a retirement match at WrestleMania, no if and's or but's about it. Not in 2016 he doesn't, no. 10 years ago he should have had his retirement match. 2016 Hulk Hogan should not get one.
|
|
|
Post by The Future on May 1, 2015 16:03:09 GMT -5
Yes you can, and yes, they should.
Never once have I said, "you know what this match could use? Hulk Hogan."
|
|
|
Post by The Future on May 1, 2015 16:07:08 GMT -5
They also just basically whored out DX vs. NWO at WM31. X-Pac can't wrestle because STDs. NAO can go, but Shawn won't...and if he did, I'd want him to come back for a bigger, better match. Who wants to see 3 relics and Sting against 4 guys who can still relatively go but can't truly bump any of their opponents. And what would even be the motivation?
Let it go, brother. Hulkamania is going to be a piece of nostalgia, for many, forever. I understand that. Doesn't mean I wanna see him on WM in the ring. I loved Barney profusely at one point in my life, I'm not clamoring to watch hours of programming with him now.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on May 1, 2015 16:09:32 GMT -5
They also just basically whored out DX vs. NWO at WM31. X-Pac can't wrestle because STDs. NAO can go, but Shawn won't...and if he did, I'd want him to come back for a bigger, better match. Who wants to see 3 relics and Sting against 4 guys who can still relatively go but can't truly bump any of their opponents. And what would even be the motivation? Let it go, brother. Hulkamania is going to be a piece of nostalgia, for many, forever. I understand that. Doesn't mean I wanna see him on WM in the ring. I loved Barney profusely at one point in my life, I'm not clamoring to watch hours of programming with him now. This is like...gospel.
|
|
|
Post by HVMMONS on May 1, 2015 16:26:37 GMT -5
"You can't have WrestleMania 32 without Hulk Hogan." Well, WWE have had: X, XI, XII, 13, XIV, XV, 2000, X-SEVEN, XX, 22, 23, XXIV, 25, XXVI, XXVII, XXVIII and 29 without Hulk Hogan. That 17 WrestleMania's without Hulk Hogan. I think 32 would be just fine without you, Hulkster.
|
|
|
Post by Nivro™ on May 1, 2015 16:28:42 GMT -5
Every wrestlemania until the end of time should have Hogan & Austin on the card some way, some how....just not in a wrestling role.
|
|