underjohngrohs
Main Eventer
"Do I Have Everybody's Attention Now?"
Joined on: May 19, 2012 17:48:25 GMT -5
Posts: 2,959
|
Post by underjohngrohs on Jul 19, 2015 23:32:18 GMT -5
I really would love to see this, but i doubt it's going to happen. From where i'm sitting, i'm thinking the main event will be Rollins defending the WWE World Heavyweight Title in a Triple Threat Match against both Brock Lesnar and The Undertaker at the same time. It's a possibility but at the same time, my other option is Brock vs Taker at Summerslam one on one.
|
|
Daniel F'n Bryan
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 16, 2014 14:37:32 GMT -5
Posts: 3,349
|
Post by Daniel F'n Bryan on Jul 19, 2015 23:36:48 GMT -5
Nah, Taker vs Lesnar. It has to happen.
|
|
Mr Wrestling Jr.
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 6, 2010 7:07:35 GMT -5
Posts: 3,410
|
Post by Mr Wrestling Jr. on Jul 19, 2015 23:45:32 GMT -5
I don't know who Rollins will face, but he wants nothing to do with Brock so he'll stay far away from anything involving him.
|
|
|
Post by cmiller79 on Jul 20, 2015 0:15:00 GMT -5
i doubt that will happen but it would be cool to see taker in a title match
|
|
CaK
Main Eventer
Possible Bad Trader Not allowed to trade here
Follow at @245TStudios!!!!
Joined on: May 6, 2006 8:52:03 GMT -5
Posts: 1,518
|
Post by CaK on Jul 20, 2015 0:25:24 GMT -5
I don't know what match you watched but Rollins turned into Taker lol. I mean he was so unimportant once that happened he just disappeared
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Jul 20, 2015 0:25:38 GMT -5
Starting to think face/tweener HHH vs Rollins at SSlam. HHH calling it Rollins "biggest test " etc.
|
|
Miztery
Superstar
Joined on: Dec 30, 2014 0:16:59 GMT -5
Posts: 892
|
Post by Miztery on Jul 20, 2015 0:30:36 GMT -5
I'd rather they not but Lesnar vs Taker. 1v1. Lesnar turns the match into a train wreck and destroys Undertaker. Sting comes in after Lesnar exits and hits Undertaker while he is down. Setting up WM32 where Sting will unfortunately go 0-2 in his WWE career. Unless Sting gets his own thing of course.
|
|
|
Post by Planktung on Jul 20, 2015 0:33:49 GMT -5
Taker/Lesnar being involved in the same match of any kind can off.
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Jul 20, 2015 0:46:03 GMT -5
I would rather see Lesnar vs. Kane some point one on one, then see old man Taker vs. Brock again.
|
|
The Dave
Main Eventer
Con-Chair-Tos all around!
Joined on: Feb 2, 2008 15:29:11 GMT -5
Posts: 3,480
|
Post by The Dave on Jul 20, 2015 0:48:13 GMT -5
I would rather see Lesnar vs. Kane some point one on one, then see old man Taker vs. Brock again. Nah man, STING!! Sting vs. Taker would be soooooooo good!!!
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Jul 20, 2015 0:58:15 GMT -5
I would rather see Lesnar vs. Kane some point one on one, then see old man Taker vs. Brock again. Nah man, STING!! Sting vs. Taker would be soooooooo good!!! YESSSS!!!!!!!! Sting = an old man who forgets spots vs. Undertaker = an old man who can't do certain spots I love it!! Book it, Vinnie Mac!! Forget the future, we got the old and decrepit.
|
|
|
Post by Jonathan Karate on Jul 20, 2015 0:59:10 GMT -5
That was the worst return Taker has ever had....
|
|
|
Post by BoJack Hogan on Jul 20, 2015 1:01:39 GMT -5
Rollins got the shaft bad. If I HAD to guess, I could see him facing Kane...or Cena. I'd rather see him face Cena to keep the title match important, but I REALLY don't want to see Cena as champion again. Besides, I like him as US champ, I've gotten used to the good matches on Raw. They need to keep Rollins strong. He's the best heel that they have, and he's the champion. He needs a recovery match from the sad yet realistic display at Battleground, so a narrow win over Cena might be the thing to put him over the edge. A win over Kane, no offense to Kane (who I am a huge fan of in this role and any other) does nothing for Rollins or his title reign. From a logic standpoint, unless they build something, I don't know who else it would be. Reigns looks to be continuing with the Wyatts, and he just lost to Bray, so he has no business in another title match. Ambrose just happened, Orton basically just happened, and if they are going to feud him with Triple H they should really hold off for a better payoff. They could do the Shield 3-way, but that's another one that they should hold for Wrestlemania (and, you know, the aforementioned reasons).
I'd actually love to see Rollins in there with Taker and Brock. He would add some speed and agility to an otherwise slow-paced match, he could escape with the belt when the other two get distracted with each other, it would put Taker in another title match, and it would be excellent bragadocious fodder for Rollins' jerkass heel character. Honestly however, he'd get the same fuel from beating Cena and he really has no business in the Taker/Brock grudge match. My first choice is Rollins/Cena, but I do like the idea of the 3-way.
Now, to find Rollins a new finisher....
|
|
|
Post by Liv Is Life on Jul 20, 2015 2:18:37 GMT -5
It will be Rollins vs Triple H, I'm just intrigued to see why and how they explain it. Probably won't really make sense, but Rollins needs the clean win over Hunter...no way around it. Hes been booked like a bitch and if they seriously want to salvage him for another potential run, he HAS to get a solid clean win over someone of Hunters caliber.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Jul 20, 2015 2:51:50 GMT -5
It looks like we're going to get Rollins vs Kane for the Title along with Undertaker vs Lesnar. I guess they went cold on Lesnar vs Reigns II with Sheamus cashing in and Triple H vs Rollins, hence why we now have Undertaker involved as back up. Having said that, the only way I'll be happy with Undertaker vs Lesnar is if Lesnar wins clean again then decimates him to the point of no return, essentially retiring him and sending him straight into the Hall of Fame; Or Sting shows up and gets involved setting up Undertaker vs Sting at Wrestlemania. If Undertaker beats Lesnar clean I'll be fuming.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 12:21:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2015 3:29:03 GMT -5
Would make no sense for Rollins to suddenly be involved.
Rollins vs Deano for the belt.
Taker vs Lesnar.
|
|
kimberlasskick
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 9, 2006 21:28:04 GMT -5
Posts: 1,425
|
Post by kimberlasskick on Jul 20, 2015 5:42:07 GMT -5
I could see Kane vs Rollins only if it's a new masked Kane. No way it's corporate Kane vs Rollins. Lesnar and Taker main events with Sting helping Undertaker acting as a vigilante and Helps Taker win but Taker is pissed off he helped setting up their match at WM
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Jul 20, 2015 6:27:02 GMT -5
Nope. The champion doesn't matter. Who cares about Seth Rollins? He just holds some piece of metal around his waist. Seeing Brock/Undertaker for no real reason can't be ruined by involving some nobody like Set Rollins.
#WWELogic
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 12:21:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2015 7:17:57 GMT -5
Seth Rollins vs. Sting
Brock Lesnar vs. Undertaker
Sid vs. Vader
|
|
torriefan4life
Superstar
Joined on: Mar 9, 2012 13:27:48 GMT -5
Posts: 812
|
Post by torriefan4life on Jul 20, 2015 7:27:16 GMT -5
Seth Rollins vs. Sting Brock Lesnar vs. Undertaker Sid vs. Vader I don't know if they can waste Sid Vs Vader at Summerslam though.....If they want 100,000 people at Mania they had best save that barn burner for WM 32
|
|