Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 8:34:50 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2015 7:41:48 GMT -5
It looks like we're going to get Rollins vs Kane for the Title along with Undertaker vs Lesnar. I guess they went cold on Lesnar vs Reigns II with Sheamus cashing in and Triple H vs Rollins, hence why we now have Undertaker involved as back up. Having said that, the only way I'll be happy with Undertaker vs Lesnar is if Lesnar wins clean again then decimates him to the point of no return, essentially retiring him and sending him straight into the Hall of Fame; Or Sting shows up and gets involved setting up Undertaker vs Sting at Wrestlemania. If Undertaker beats Lesnar clean I'll be fuming. I think they could still pull off Lesnar vs Reigns II. Lesnar destroys Undertaker at SummerSlam clean, denying Takers revenge and proving his dominance and ultimately making the streak ending not lose its meaning. Lesnar continues his dominance and finds his way back to the title picture and is champion going into Wrestlemania. Reigns is the hard part here cause back to back Rumble wins won't bode well so not sure how he gets into the main event but depending on where Reigns is with the crowd at that point, you can end Wrestlemania 32 with the way 31 was (most likely) intended to play out. |
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Jul 20, 2015 8:28:47 GMT -5
I was hoping this was the route they'd go, but it's not. I don't even care who Rollins faces at SummerSlam. He's so boring and never should've been Champion. Lesnar vs. Taker should be for the title and Rollins should go back to feuding with Ambrose and actually lose this time, since that was the only time I ever found him relevant.
|
|
Arthur Speaks
Main Eventer
Writer
Joined on: Aug 9, 2012 11:42:20 GMT -5
Posts: 1,726
|
Post by Arthur Speaks on Jul 20, 2015 9:06:09 GMT -5
It's going to be Undertaker and Lesnar with Rollins facing Triple H for the title.
The setup is that The Authority knew Rollins was going to crack under the pressure so they brought in The Undertaker to preserve his title reign. Rollins is incensed and slowly starts turning on Triple H, leading to him facing Rollins himself at SummerSlam. Rollins retains the title cleanly, and ditches The Authority the next night turning him face.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 8:34:50 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2015 9:15:56 GMT -5
I'm glad to see Taker back. But I don't really want him to face Brock. I get why they're doing it because it's common sense, but I don't want either to lose.
Ideally, on Raw tonight, they'll make it to where Taker got his revenge last night. Heyman holds back Lesnar and tells him the streak is already broken. Blah blah blah case closed.
Taker still wants Brock so at the end of the show, Taker comes back out and calls out Lesnar. Taker wants a match at SummerSlam. As Taker awaits Lesnar, Sting's theme hits and he walks out onto the stage and points his bat at Taker.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 8:34:50 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2015 9:25:38 GMT -5
Nah. It'll be Lesnar vs 'Taker for sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by BOOKER_T on Jul 20, 2015 11:24:17 GMT -5
Seth Rollins vs. Sting Brock Lesnar vs. Undertaker Sid vs. Vader Id rather see Vader/Seth or Brock/Adam Rose |
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Jul 20, 2015 11:37:14 GMT -5
This won't happen because Battleground basically told us this:
BROCK LESNAR!
UNDERTAKER!
And that Seth Rollins guy who is some sort of champion or something, but he's not important
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 8:34:50 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2015 11:37:33 GMT -5
Knowing how WWE has booked things in the past, Sting vs Rollins is a possibility. He beats Seth for the title, then Sheamus cashes in. It'd be stupid, but I can see it happening.
|
|
LD8506
Main Eventer
30 Classified Ref's and counting!
Joined on: Apr 26, 2014 6:29:52 GMT -5
Posts: 1,201
|
Post by LD8506 on Jul 20, 2015 11:43:53 GMT -5
Knowing how WWE has booked things in the past, Sting vs Rollins is a possibility. He beats Seth for the title, then Sheamus cashes in. It'd be stupid, but I can see it happening. I don't like the idea, but as we all know the WWE has dumbass creative writers. Another thing I do not want Sheamus to be the WWE World Heavyweight champion. Never really liked that fella. |
|
|
|
Post by GreyHaze:Big Bad Booty Daddy on Jul 20, 2015 11:53:57 GMT -5
I'm just really confused as to where this is going. I honestly don't care at this point, just have Sting vs The Undertaker and I could finally rest in peace.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 8:34:50 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2015 11:58:27 GMT -5
Knowing how WWE has booked things in the past, Sting vs Rollins is a possibility. He beats Seth for the title, then Sheamus cashes in. It'd be stupid, but I can see it happening. I don't like the idea, but as we all know the WWE has dumbass creative writers. Another thing I do not want Sheamus to be the WWE World Heavyweight champion. Never really liked that fella. I don't like that fella either fella. |
|
LD8506
Main Eventer
30 Classified Ref's and counting!
Joined on: Apr 26, 2014 6:29:52 GMT -5
Posts: 1,201
|
Post by LD8506 on Jul 20, 2015 12:03:28 GMT -5
I don't like the idea, but as we all know the WWE has dumbass creative writers. Another thing I do not want Sheamus to be the WWE World Heavyweight champion. Never really liked that fella. I don't like that fella either fella. Lol |
|
|
|
Post by sitruC on Jul 20, 2015 12:11:25 GMT -5
I have no idea what they're doing with anyone after last night apart from the U.S title triple threat.
I feel that Seth is going to turn face soon though, if he goes against HHH at SummerSlam I'd honestly hope Ambrose and Reigns make the save after the Authority beat on Seth after the match.
|
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Jul 20, 2015 12:30:42 GMT -5
rollins/hhh and lesnar/taker really don't sound interesting to me whatsoever.
|
|
torriefan4life
Superstar
Joined on: Mar 9, 2012 13:27:48 GMT -5
Posts: 812
|
Post by torriefan4life on Jul 20, 2015 13:05:00 GMT -5
I'm glad to see Taker back. But I don't really want him to face Brock. I get why they're doing it because it's common sense, but I don't want either to lose. Ideally, on Raw tonight, they'll make it to where Taker got his revenge last night. Heyman holds back Lesnar and tells him the streak is already broken. Blah blah blah case closed. Taker still wants Brock so at the end of the show, Taker comes back out and calls out Lesnar. Taker wants a match at SummerSlam. As Taker awaits Lesnar, Sting's theme hits and he walks out onto the stage and points his bat at Taker. I'd feel like a 5 year old on Christmas morning if Raw ends like that tonight  |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 8:34:50 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2015 13:32:16 GMT -5
I'm glad to see Taker back. But I don't really want him to face Brock. I get why they're doing it because it's common sense, but I don't want either to lose. Ideally, on Raw tonight, they'll make it to where Taker got his revenge last night. Heyman holds back Lesnar and tells him the streak is already broken. Blah blah blah case closed. Taker still wants Brock so at the end of the show, Taker comes back out and calls out Lesnar. Taker wants a match at SummerSlam. As Taker awaits Lesnar, Sting's theme hits and he walks out onto the stage and points his bat at Taker. I'd feel like a 5 year old on Christmas morning if Raw ends like that tonight As would I |
|
|
|
Post by TX on Jul 20, 2015 14:03:22 GMT -5
Exclusive photo of WWE Creative today...  |
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Jul 20, 2015 16:03:54 GMT -5
Everything right now is a cluster  . |
|
|
|
Post by The Everlasting Spirit © on Jul 20, 2015 16:12:34 GMT -5
Starting to see a flipped side now of when Lesnar broke the streak. Everyone (I included said it was stupid). Now nobody likes the idea of Undertaker going over. Why?
Personally i don't get how anyone finds Brock Lesnar remotely entertaining.
1) He can't talk for toffee.
2) All he does is suplex someone - if it was Cena everyone would be up in arms about it. It's just boring.
3) He's a part timer and i don't think any part timer should be champion.
While i was glad to see Undertakers 'revenge' last night, i've zero interest in a rematch. Partly as all I want is Taker v Sting as his last match - secondly i want Undertaker to be alive by that match. Lesnar just seems sloppy in the ring and seeing him throw guys around just makes me cringe.
Anyone thats my point - rant over.
|
|
rkoorfu
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Oct 29, 2006 14:53:10 GMT -5
Posts: 231
|
Post by rkoorfu on Jul 20, 2015 17:33:01 GMT -5
Would be an entertaining main event, and having taker in a triple threat would mean you could hide some of his faults at this point in his career and having him in the match would mean that brock wouldnt just annihilate rollins. Unfortunetly I agree with others and think its HHH time which I am not looking forward to having 3 out of the 4 people in your main event and co-main event part timers. My dream would be thats Ambrose gets back into the title picture and finally wins the big one over his big rival but that just wouldn't make sense at this point.
|
|
