|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Sept 10, 2015 15:35:26 GMT -5
I like the suggestion of replacing SmackDown! with NXT.
Have the arena set up EXACTLY as the Takeover Brooklyn was and it could have it's own unique feel and continue to be what it is... just on a big scale.
But then, I like the indie feel it has to it at the moment and I think that's a large factor in its cult following. It's a tough one for me.
I like the Full Sail arena they have, but if they're selling out arenas then why not put them in them?
I'm torn.
Anyway, the answer to this question is yes, it should absolutely be an isolated brand and NXT guys should NOT be on the main roster sporadically like the Lucha Dragons were and Sasha Banks. The exception to this rule would be Owens because he owned it.
|
|
|
|
Post by cmiller79 on Sept 10, 2015 16:21:07 GMT -5
No its fine the way it is
|
|
|
|
Post by AmericanMadeLesGold on Sept 10, 2015 16:22:05 GMT -5
I can see what you mean. The transitions from NXT to RAW need to improve.
It kind of sucks that they have to debut and then go back and lose to NXT talent to put them over.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 23:49:59 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2015 16:30:34 GMT -5
Honestly just replace Smackdown
|
|
|
|
Post by c-scope on Sept 10, 2015 16:54:16 GMT -5
It technecaly it is , its the developmental brand.
|
|
Miztery
Superstar
Joined on: Dec 30, 2014 0:16:59 GMT -5
Posts: 892 
|
Post by Miztery on Sept 10, 2015 19:09:41 GMT -5
Yep. The Owens vs Cesaro match would have been so much better at SS if Owens didn't have to partake in a ladder match the previous night. And that's just one example.
|
|
|
|
Post by ~ Cymru ~ on Sept 10, 2015 19:41:20 GMT -5
Neh, im undecided on if I like NXT at the moment. The Quaterly shows are great but everything in the middle other than Joe, Enzo Amore and Cass doesn't do much for me. I think they could do with going to 2 hours and allowing the guys more on screen time. But im happy for NXT to remain a trainig ground.
|
|
|
|
Post by JC Motors on Sept 10, 2015 20:06:09 GMT -5
It is a separate brand in a way
|
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Sept 10, 2015 23:09:19 GMT -5
NXT is a developmental brand. There is no need to turn it into anything more.
|
|
|
|
Post by Himmy! on Sept 11, 2015 1:23:34 GMT -5
It seems to have turned into that. I think it's vitally important it remains as developmental too though.
|
|
HTMN
Superstar
Joined on: Oct 24, 2013 15:42:13 GMT -5
Posts: 849
|
Post by HTMN on Sept 11, 2015 8:05:33 GMT -5
Nope. I think NXT is absolutely fine as it is.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 23:49:59 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2015 10:15:08 GMT -5
No.
I need as much Sasha Banks on my TV as possible. Same with Becky Lynch. Incredible performers.
|
|
weaseltv
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 22, 2013 18:57:55 GMT -5
Posts: 3,672
|
Post by weaseltv on Sept 11, 2015 10:55:01 GMT -5
if what I read about NXT is true, I'd say no.
what I read is that NXT isn't profitable.
Considering they hire trainers, along with a permanent facility, and that Full Sail doesn't make a whole lot of money, this makes sense.
This was the excuse they used also to say they weren't giving NXT wrestlers a cut of the bigger events like in New York.
With that said,
the NXT wrestlers have a big monetary incentive to get to the WWE roster...
|
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Sept 11, 2015 15:32:13 GMT -5
The farther NXT is kept from WWE, the better.
|
|
