|
|
Post by T R W on Oct 19, 2015 6:45:07 GMT -5
Good
|
|
jcjdotcom
Superstar
Joined on: Oct 23, 2005 23:26:04 GMT -5
Posts: 530
|
Post by jcjdotcom on Oct 20, 2015 10:01:31 GMT -5
I like lucha - is that one of the choices? I honestly don't know what all of the things listed are.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Yes Man on Oct 20, 2015 10:15:36 GMT -5
Two dudes beating the  out of each other is always fun. But I don't particularly care what style, as long as it makes sense and doesn't suck. I hate death match and ultra violent wrestling though, there's nothing good about it. |
|
|
|
Post by cripplercrossface on Oct 20, 2015 20:01:28 GMT -5
Any matches involving Kurt Angle, Chris Benoit, Chris Jericho, Bret Hart, Shawn Michaels, Eddie Guerrero, Dean Malenko, Brock Lesnar, Daniel Bryan, and CM Punk are always good.
|
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Oct 21, 2015 15:12:53 GMT -5
I'm a sucker for high flyers, but I also like powerhouse wrestling. I went with the latter because I think the former will do very well without my vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by Darkhawk on Oct 21, 2015 15:20:21 GMT -5
I have to say I enjoy when wrestlers fight dirty, when need more of that from heels.
|
|
|
|
Post by wyleecyotee on Oct 21, 2015 15:49:37 GMT -5
I like it when there's a real story behind it, Bret Hart like. I guess that's technical but then some people are technical with no real meaning so.
And then there's people like Triple H and HBK that aren't really technical but they always have a story in the ring. I feel that is so lacking now. It's great to be great in the ring at all the moves but when you can't create a story with it then there just fancy moves.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 9:43:03 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2015 15:55:10 GMT -5
I really like Lucharesu.
|
|
|
|
Post by "The Perfect Ten" Mizard on Oct 21, 2015 22:04:23 GMT -5
I'd have to go with showman. If the wrestler doesn't entertain the crowd then he sucks imo. Hogan, Warrior, Cena may have not been the most technically sound wrestlers but at least most of the time they got the crowd interested in them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Himmy! on Oct 22, 2015 0:41:27 GMT -5
As long as I'm entertained with a good story I'm happy. I appreciate all of the listed styles though.
|
|
Daniel F'n Bryan
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 16, 2014 14:37:32 GMT -5
Posts: 3,349
|
Post by Daniel F'n Bryan on Oct 22, 2015 15:57:32 GMT -5
High Flying and Hardcore.
Besides that, just a damn good match honestly...
|
|
|
|
Post by Shane O. on Oct 22, 2015 16:23:49 GMT -5
Any sort of technical wrestling for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by OmegaGaijin on Oct 22, 2015 16:26:15 GMT -5
This. I call Brets style 'Technical-Realism'. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 9:43:03 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2015 19:02:24 GMT -5
Technical or High Flying
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Dragon on Oct 24, 2015 14:00:15 GMT -5
A good story is the main thing.
I voted technical as in the guys who came from ROH (Rollins, Cesaro, Owens etc). Where they use their signature moves wisely but have plenty of different offense as well.
|
|
MonsoonMan
Main Eventer
SE Wisconsin, NE Illinois figure hunter.
Joined on: Jan 1, 2012 22:47:05 GMT -5
Posts: 2,448
|
Post by MonsoonMan on Oct 24, 2015 16:31:35 GMT -5
vintage William(steven) regal matches are my absolute favorite things to watch. wcw, television champion run, he would just methodically dismantle his opponents and flat out out-wrestle them in the ring. i also have come to love the puro style
|
|
|
|
Post by BØRNS on Oct 24, 2015 19:55:26 GMT -5
I don't care for hardcore, but I like a good mix of everything. My favorite wrestlers have a mix of styles to their in-ring abilities.
|
|
