|
|
Post by theMOESIAH on Nov 22, 2015 23:41:27 GMT -5
Funny how when WWE decides they want Reigns as "the guy" and push him as such, The ratings have tanked to all time lows. The predictability that comes with this Roman Reigns push makes me want to tune out. I knew from the second this tournament was announced, Reigns was winning. They made it obvious by centering it all around him, Same thing they did with the Royal Rumble. WWE just doesnt learn do they? They do the same stupid crap over and over again. Yes because Sheamus is gonna fill those seats up and the ratings are gonna be bigger than ever! Nobody wants either of them. I'd be fine with them feuding over the IC or US title but neither one of them should be the focal point of the company. |
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Nov 22, 2015 23:41:59 GMT -5
Honesty I dont think it's a good idea for a Roman heel turn there's not enough babyface talent as it is so turing roman heel isn't gonna work.Yeah so half the crowd boos him so does cena.You want Kevin owens to turn face because people chant him? No it's just not there yet.The Last thing we need is another heel we need more babyfaces. There's a massive difference between Cena being booed and Reigns being booed. And no, Kevin Owens shouldn't turn face because he's really, really good at being a heel. Roman Reigns should turn heel because he's really, really bad at being a babyface. |
|
|
|
Post by aggressiveperfector on Nov 22, 2015 23:42:46 GMT -5
This could honestly dip ratings into the 1s. That's what's scary.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 13:11:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2015 23:43:12 GMT -5
The show should've just ended with Brock Lesnar coming out and destroying everyone left in the ring. I would've been satisfied with that.
|
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Nov 22, 2015 23:44:13 GMT -5
This could honestly dip ratings into the 1s. That's what's scary. They won't, but they should. I'd say I'm hoping for a lower rating, but it doesn't matter. If they cared about ratings, they wouldn't have put the title on Sheamus. It's not about the talent, it's about the brand, and WWE believes the brand is strong. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 13:11:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2015 23:44:37 GMT -5
Lmaosheamuswins
|
|
Miztery
Superstar
Joined on: Dec 30, 2014 0:16:59 GMT -5
Posts: 892 
|
Post by Miztery on Nov 22, 2015 23:47:17 GMT -5
My thoughts are the same. I hope Ambrose is a heel champion by the time Rollins comes back and they can feud for the title. Ambrose/Rollins is the only title feud I've enjoyed in a year. Lesnar/Rollins didn't do it for me and everyone else has been old enough for a retirement home.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 13:11:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2015 23:48:15 GMT -5
Yes because Sheamus is gonna fill those seats up and the ratings are gonna be bigger than ever! Nobody wants either of them. I'd be fine with them feuding over the IC or US title but neither one of them should be the focal point of the company. There was alot of people here who was fine with Roman winning the title. |
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Nov 22, 2015 23:49:18 GMT -5
Nobody wants either of them. I'd be fine with them feuding over the IC or US title but neither one of them should be the focal point of the company. There was alot of people here who was fine with Roman winning the title. Most of them wanted him to turn heel and win it. Myself included. Would have been a huge moment and likely created a big star out of him in the future. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 13:11:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2015 23:50:46 GMT -5
Honesty I dont think it's a good idea for a Roman heel turn there's not enough babyface talent as it is so turing roman heel isn't gonna work.Yeah so half the crowd boos him so does cena.You want Kevin owens to turn face because people chant him? No it's just not there yet.The Last thing we need is another heel we need more babyfaces. Heel Reigns Vs Face Ambrose is more than fine until Rumble/Mania. It doesn't change the fact that we need more babyfaces. |
|
|
|
Post by Sizzle on Nov 22, 2015 23:53:00 GMT -5
Couldn't have had Ambrose go in the ring and DQ Reigns, keeping the title on him and off of Sheamus? And later have Reigns say something like: "I wanted to prove myself" or something and punch Ambrose? Anything but Sheamus.  |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 13:11:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2015 23:52:45 GMT -5
WWE Creative is a bunch of idiots.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kanenite on Nov 22, 2015 23:52:47 GMT -5
Only things I enjoyed from this PPV were Kane and Taker vs. The Wyatt's, and The New Day doing what they do.
|
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Nov 22, 2015 23:55:25 GMT -5
Heel Reigns Vs Face Ambrose is more than fine until Rumble/Mania. It doesn't change the fact that we need more babyfaces. What's more appealing? A couple of over babyfaces (John Cena and Dean Ambrose) chasing the newly crowned and fresh heel champion (Roman Reigns) or a babyface who can't get over (Roman Reigns) chasing the heel champion who has never been over (Sheamus.) There's your short term. Not to mention, babyface Rollins vs. heel Reigns when he returns. There's your long term. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 13:11:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2015 23:58:02 GMT -5
It doesn't change the fact that we need more babyfaces. What's more appealing? A couple of over babyfaces (John Cena and Dean Ambrose) chasing the newly crowned and fresh heel champion (Roman Reigns) or a babyface who can't get over (Roman Reigns) chasing the heel champion who has never been over (Sheamus.) There's your short term. Not to mention, babyface Rollins vs. heel Reigns when he returns. There's your long term. do you think they'll really turn Reigns? They may tease it but I dont see them doing it. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 13:11:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2015 0:00:25 GMT -5
It doesn't change the fact that we need more babyfaces. What's more appealing? A couple of over babyfaces (John Cena and Dean Ambrose) chasing the newly crowned and fresh heel champion (Roman Reigns) or a babyface who can't get over (Roman Reigns) chasing the heel champion who has never been over (Sheamus.) There's your short term. Not to mention, babyface Rollins vs. heel Reigns when he returns. There's your long term. IMO roman is an over babyface he gets Cena chants half the crowd likes him and half of them don't. |
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Nov 23, 2015 0:00:26 GMT -5
What's more appealing? A couple of over babyfaces (John Cena and Dean Ambrose) chasing the newly crowned and fresh heel champion (Roman Reigns) or a babyface who can't get over (Roman Reigns) chasing the heel champion who has never been over (Sheamus.) There's your short term. Not to mention, babyface Rollins vs. heel Reigns when he returns. There's your long term. do you think they'll really turn Reigns? They may tease it but I dont see them doing it. Not at this point. If they were gonna do it, it would've been tonight. I was just arguing the point that he had made about not turning Reigns because there aren't enough babyfaces. All the logic in the world said turn Reigns tonight. There's absolutely no negatives that could have come out of it. |
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Nov 23, 2015 0:02:22 GMT -5
What's more appealing? A couple of over babyfaces (John Cena and Dean Ambrose) chasing the newly crowned and fresh heel champion (Roman Reigns) or a babyface who can't get over (Roman Reigns) chasing the heel champion who has never been over (Sheamus.) There's your short term. Not to mention, babyface Rollins vs. heel Reigns when he returns. There's your long term. IMO roman is an over babyface he gets Cena chants half the crowd likes him and half of them don't. If you can't see the difference between Cena's reactions vs. Roman's reactions, we're just going to have to agree to disagree here. |
|
|
|
Post by Planktung on Nov 23, 2015 0:02:40 GMT -5
Heel Reigns Vs Face Ambrose is more than fine until Rumble/Mania. It doesn't change the fact that we need more babyfaces. Not really. We just need the current crop of babyfaces to not be booked like sh*t. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 13:11:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2015 0:03:28 GMT -5
do you think they'll really turn Reigns? They may tease it but I dont see them doing it. Not at this point. If they were gonna do it, it would've been tonight. I was just arguing the point that he had made about not turning Reigns because there aren't enough babyfaces. All the logic in the world said turn Reigns tonight. There's absolutely no negatives that could have come out of it. When I saw the all black vest, I thought.. maybe there's a chance |
|
