|
|
Post by marino13 on Feb 14, 2016 17:20:38 GMT -5
Loving that Zombie Taker scan. Hope we see a regular version of that real soon.
|
|
|
|
Post by Xæro #FakeCollector on Feb 14, 2016 17:23:42 GMT -5
Zombies? What a stupid line.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 20:29:27 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2016 17:24:40 GMT -5
Zombies? What a stupid line. Zombie stuff is very popular so I think it's a very smart line |
|
|
|
Post by East Coast on Feb 14, 2016 17:24:59 GMT -5
that RSC Y2J would make a great bottom half of an AJ Styles custom dylan |
|
|
|
Post by ricflair4ever on Feb 14, 2016 17:26:07 GMT -5
I see these Zombie figures being used in feds across the country in a very Lucha Underground type way.....if you get what I'm saying. I'm not on twitter, so please for no other reason than my personal amusement, someone tweet Jim Cornette a pic of those zombie figures and let the hilarity ensue!
|
|
|
|
Post by jayrod2009 on Feb 14, 2016 17:26:04 GMT -5
Zombies? What a stupid line. Its pretty funny. We practically begged fot them last year when Bill said they were olace holders and one off's. Now we complain??? You know. We need to crapor get off the pot here at WFIGs.... |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 20:29:27 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2016 17:27:18 GMT -5
I'm not on twitter, so please for no other reason than my personal amusement, someone tweet Jim Cornette a pic of those zombie figures and let the hilarity ensue! That's a  ing fantastic idea. |
|
|
|
Post by AlexWestCollects on Feb 14, 2016 17:29:43 GMT -5
not only did they fix the kneepads....they fixed the kickpad piece on Y2J's shins. Its painted now  AlexWestCollectsWell that's definitely good news! |
|
|
|
Post by Xæro #FakeCollector on Feb 14, 2016 17:31:34 GMT -5
Zombies? What a stupid line. Its pretty funny. We practically begged fot them last year when Bill said they were olace holders and one off's. Now we complain??? You know. We need to crap or get off the pot here at WFIGs.... To be fair, I thought the placeholders were stupid too. We hear all these stories about Mattel wanting to cut the budget and limit articulation, and then to see money being allocated to a line that I very much see flopping despite Zombie popularity seems like a dumb decision and a waste of resources to me. I mean, imagine if the aforementioned resources had gone towards the Defining Moments Sting instead? Maybe we could have gotten a soft goods jacket. Obviously I'm just playing armchair businessman here and I could be completely wrong. I don't mean to crap on Bills work as I have a tremendous amount of respect for the effort he puts in to everything. This line just isn't for me, but it's obviously not meant to be. To each their own though. |
|
KPnDC
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 8, 2013 21:58:21 GMT -5
Posts: 1,754
|
Post by KPnDC on Feb 14, 2016 17:33:00 GMT -5
Zombies? What a stupid line. Its pretty funny. We practically begged fot them last year when Bill said they were olace holders and one off's. Now we complain??? You know. We need to crap or get off the pot here at WFIGs.... I agree. The sad part is, a lot of us here are in our 30s and act like children. Zombies are the biggest thing going right now. If people don't like them, that's cool. It's not taking away from the Elite or Basic line. It'll be its own separate entity. |
|
|
|
Post by Next Manufactured’s Sweater on Feb 14, 2016 17:33:09 GMT -5
Zombies? What a stupid line. Its pretty funny. We practically begged fot them last year when Bill said they were olace holders and one off's. Now we complain???  |
|
|
|
Post by Next Manufactured’s Sweater on Feb 14, 2016 17:38:22 GMT -5
Its pretty funny. We practically begged fot them last year when Bill said they were olace holders and one off's. Now we complain??? You know. We need to crap or get off the pot here at WFIGs.... To be fair, I thought the placeholders were stupid too. We hear all these stories about Mattel wanting to cut the budget and limit articulation, and then to see money being allocated to a line that I very much see flopping despite Zombie popularity seems like a dumb decision and a waste of resources to me. I mean, imagine if the aforementioned resources had gone towards the Defining Moments Sting instead? Maybe we could have gotten a soft goods jacket. Obviously I'm just playing armchair businessman here and I could be completely wrong. I don't mean to crap on Bills work as I have a tremendous amount of respect for the effort he puts in to everything. This line just isn't for me, but it's obviously not meant to be. To each their own though. Yes, you are completely wrong. The money put into a zombie figure is for a figure that carries a $12.99 retail price. So for those eight figures, that's $103.92. If Mattel were putting the development/production budget for $103.92 worth of extra figures onto the budget of each Defining Moments Sting, that Defining Moments Sting then costs $103.92 on top of its usual price... So we're looking at about $130 for a Defining Moments Sting. No matter how much someone likes dressing up their wrestlers like Barbies in soft goods, people aren't looking to pay $130 for that figure just because it would come with an inaccurate cloth jacket. |
|
|
|
Post by Xæro #FakeCollector on Feb 14, 2016 17:43:34 GMT -5
To be fair, I thought the placeholders were stupid too. We hear all these stories about Mattel wanting to cut the budget and limit articulation, and then to see money being allocated to a line that I very much see flopping despite Zombie popularity seems like a dumb decision and a waste of resources to me. I mean, imagine if the aforementioned resources had gone towards the Defining Moments Sting instead? Maybe we could have gotten a soft goods jacket. Obviously I'm just playing armchair businessman here and I could be completely wrong. I don't mean to crap on Bills work as I have a tremendous amount of respect for the effort he puts in to everything. This line just isn't for me, but it's obviously not meant to be. To each their own though. Yes, you are completely wrong. The money put into a zombie figure is for a figure that carries a $12.99 retail price. So for those eight figures, that's $103.92. If Mattel were putting the development/production budget for $103.92 worth of extra figures onto the budget of each Defining Moments Sting, that Defining Moments Sting then costs $103.92 on top of its usual price... So we're looking at about $130 for a Defining Moments Sting. No matter how much someone likes dressing up their wrestlers like Barbies in soft goods, people aren't looking to pay $130 for that figure just because it would come with an inaccurate cloth jacket. Who said anything about moving the entire budget from this line onto DM Sting? Besides, there's no need for attitude or hostility. I wasn't trolling or posting flamebait. I simply stated an opinion, I even mentioned that it didn't have much merit due to not knowing the entire situation, so relax a bit. |
|
|
|
Post by jayrod2009 on Feb 14, 2016 17:43:31 GMT -5
Its pretty funny. We practically begged fot them last year when Bill said they were olace holders and one off's. Now we complain??? You know. We need to crap or get off the pot here at WFIGs.... I agree. The sad part is, a lot of us here are in our 30s and act like children. Zombies are the biggest thing going right now. If people don't like them, that's cool. It's not taking away from the Elite or Basic line. It'll be its own separate entity. Yep, I'll be buying them too. Biggest zombie wants: LOD 2000, Classic Big Bossman, and Jake the Snake with zombie snake. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 20:29:27 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2016 17:44:51 GMT -5
2 large gaps on that table.... I assume we are gonna see the new battle packs and e42 (hopefully) - they ship next month there is absolutely NO reason they shouldn't be shown |
|
|
|
Post by POOR-ly Cuyler on Feb 14, 2016 17:45:01 GMT -5
If Bray has that jacket ill definitely buy it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 20:29:27 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2016 17:45:07 GMT -5
I agree. The sad part is, a lot of us here are in our 30s and act like children. Zombies are the biggest thing going right now. If people don't like them, that's cool. It's not taking away from the Elite or Basic line. It'll be its own separate entity. Yep, I'll be buying them too. Biggest zombie wants: LOD 2000, Classic Big Bossman, and Jake the Snake with zombie snake. Ooohhhhh Jake and the snake would be wicked |
|
|
|
Post by ricflair4ever on Feb 14, 2016 17:50:14 GMT -5
I'm gonna be "that" guy and say we probably won't see zombie figures for guys whom that label could potentially be accurate for.
Edit: I will say i had a legit dream about zombie Eddie Guerrero returning to the ring. Although he could speak and was not after brains....anyway if that figure comes to pass someday....I'll pick that one up.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 20:29:27 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2016 17:52:42 GMT -5
I will probably buy the zombie Paige. It looks super cool. That Taker scan is sick, too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Next Manufactured’s Sweater on Feb 14, 2016 17:55:36 GMT -5
Yes, you are completely wrong. The money put into a zombie figure is for a figure that carries a $12.99 retail price. So for those eight figures, that's $103.92. If Mattel were putting the development/production budget for $103.92 worth of extra figures onto the budget of each Defining Moments Sting, that Defining Moments Sting then costs $103.92 on top of its usual price... So we're looking at about $130 for a Defining Moments Sting. No matter how much someone likes dressing up their wrestlers like Barbies in soft goods, people aren't looking to pay $130 for that figure just because it would come with an inaccurate cloth jacket. Who said anything about moving the entire budget from this line onto DM Sting? You alluded to it here: No worries, man. You wondered if you were wrong, I was just confirming that you were, and showing you how the "don't make these things I don't like, spend that development money on this other thing that I do like" plan doesn't work with the financial targets. |
|
