|
Post by Yambag Jones on Jan 14, 2016 13:40:41 GMT -5
I'd be shocked if they wasted the culmination of the Triple H/Reigns feud at Fast Lane. Reigns vs Lesnar is much more likely. That would be a dope rematch that would get people amped for the show.
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Jan 14, 2016 13:42:24 GMT -5
Brock wins Rumble Reigns beats Brock at Fastlane Brock beats Reigns at Mania Reigns beats Brock at Payback
They are gonna want to get Reigns to 4 WWE World Title wins before Summerslam
|
|
|
Post by cmiller79 on Jan 14, 2016 13:49:25 GMT -5
Brock wins Rumble Reigns beats Brock at Fastlane Brock beats Reigns at Mania Reigns beats Brock at Payback They are gonna want to get Reigns to 4 WWE World Title wins before Summerslam that sounds terrible at that rate they are gonna have him beat 16x or whatever records cena sets
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Jan 14, 2016 14:10:08 GMT -5
Brock wins Rumble Reigns beats Brock at Fastlane Brock beats Reigns at Mania Reigns beats Brock at Payback They are gonna want to get Reigns to 4 WWE World Title wins before Summerslam that sounds terrible at that rate they are gonna have him beat 16x or whatever records cena sets Vince probably wants to do that, no joke.
|
|
|
Post by The Sexy Psychotic on Jan 14, 2016 14:12:15 GMT -5
I just dont see what they are gonna do, like they cant possibly have Triple H in the title picture, especially at Mania; hell I dont think he'd even allow it! Maybe we get Reigns and Trips at Fastlane in a non-title Street Fight, just an all out brawl!
Then Mania we can get Reigns/Lesnar, which honestly I can deal with, as long as they build it right this time, AND its no-DQ; make it make sense for both guys, and it even puts Reigns in the "underdog" position as they can hype up the whole "imagine Lesnar in a no-DQ environment" angle.
Then throw Ambrose to Styles for the IC title at the event and BAM, not bad!
|
|
havoc7179
Main Eventer
What is this?
Joined on: Oct 16, 2012 9:11:18 GMT -5
Posts: 4,189
|
Post by havoc7179 on Jan 14, 2016 14:24:19 GMT -5
I didn't have time to follow up my post, so I'll add it here.
RR has Lesnar, Reigns, Sheamus, and Owens down to the Final Four. (I threw in Sheamus because of his status as the former champion, Lesnar because he's Lesnar, Reigns because you need him strong, and Owens because I love the guy and you need another heel).
Nakamura comes out and distracts Brock Lesnar. I pair these two up because of their former fight, and because Lesnar and Nakamura are big names in Japan. They've worked together before, so their eventual match will compliment each other. It will be a good way to introduce them to the Roster.
While they are doing a stare down, Bullet Club jump the guardrails, and beatdown everyone as Lesnar steps through the ropes and goes after Nakamura. PPV ends in chaos. They have the final four face at Fastlane.
This then allows Bullet Club to be invaders who aren't yet "signed" to WWE. They interfere again at Fastlane causing the match to be thrown out. Abeyance is the Champion until Mania, where it will be a Wrestlemania Tournament. Owens vs. Lesnar; Sheamus vs. Reigns. Winner of each match proceeds to fight for the title at Mania. I'd prefer it to be the same night.
This whole time, there are interviews on Raw, NXT, and Smackdown talking about whether Balor is behind the Bullet Club because of his past membership as its leader. Balor finally makes his main roster debut on Raw, and Bullet Club comes out. They proceed to beat down Balor. At that point, it is revealed that SETH FREAKING ROLLINS is the man who brought in the Bullet Club. He wanted to make sure that his spot his secure, and wanted to make sure that he gets to take the title off of Reigns.
I'd build the match between Nakamura and Lesnar until after Wrestlemania. Don't let him fight until then so that they can see why he is the King of Strong.
Alternatively, if needed, Bullet Club still interfere at Fastlane, only this time causing Sheamus to lose. Sheamus and his League of Nations face the Bullet Club at Mania. Nakamura faces Brock Lesnar at Mania. And Reigns vs. the current IC Champion Dean Ambrose since the IC holder was traditionally the next in line for a shot with the WHC Champion. It leaves out Owens, but he can work a MITB match and win that.
|
|
|
Post by cmiller79 on Jan 14, 2016 14:32:03 GMT -5
that sounds terrible at that rate they are gonna have him beat 16x or whatever records cena sets Vince probably wants to do that, no joke. roman will have 6 years in the business and be a 10x world champion lol
|
|
|
Post by FBtagteamsrule on Jan 14, 2016 16:24:09 GMT -5
not getting too excited. wwe creative will just screw it up.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Jan 14, 2016 20:16:28 GMT -5
Now that this has come out, I'm more expecting Triple H vs Reigns at Fast Lane now to set up Reigns vs Lesnar II, which I'm thoroughly against. If this is the case, I'm assuming Rock vs Triple H will happen, otherwise Triple H vs Reigns would be going down at Wrestlemania.
In all likelyhood though, it could simply be referring to The Wyatt's taking out Lesnar, with Lesnar vs the Family at Fast Lane, and finally Lesnar vs Bray at Wrestlemania.
|
|
Miztery
Superstar
Joined on: Dec 30, 2014 0:16:59 GMT -5
Posts: 892
|
Post by Miztery on Jan 14, 2016 23:23:59 GMT -5
I hate Reigns vs Lesnar. Vince doesn't want either to look bad so we get crap like tug of war with the title. On top of that Lesnar doesn't show up much so we get Reigns vs Heyman which leads to a bunch of watered down Heyman promos just so Reigns doesn't look like trash.
|
|
|
Post by Squid: The Anti-Hero on Jan 15, 2016 9:48:46 GMT -5
So RR is used to set up an angle, and for three straight years the RR is about reigns Wait... RR= Royal Rumble.... RR= ...ROMAN REIGNS! IVE DECIPHERED THEIR PLANS!! THE ONLY REASON THEY DO THE RUMBLE IS FOR ROMAN REIGNS!! #ROMANWINSLOL
|
|
|
Post by KrimV on Jan 16, 2016 4:19:14 GMT -5
I think it would be a waste to have the Reigns/HHH match at Fastlane. Let it be a non-title match at Wrestlemania. They need to bolster the card and that match can be big enough without the belt. Besides, it wouldn't make any logical sense to have HHH enter the Rumble as he could just as easily book himself a title match any time he wants on Raw or Smackdown. I expect HHH to be there, but not an entrant in the Rumble. But once again, the problem becomes who takes the belt if Reigns doesn't have it?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 5:57:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2016 6:35:38 GMT -5
I'm bored of Jericho now tbh.
|
|
|
Post by Edge618 on Jan 16, 2016 6:39:45 GMT -5
Idc what anyone says, HHH vs Reigns does not scream biggest Mania of All time main event. If Daniel Bryan is healthy, it writes it self and Mania is saved. If not there are still way better options than HHH vs Reigns. Would much rather see Lesnar vs Owens, Lesnar vs Reigns II, Lesnar vs Rock, Lesnar vs Reigns vs Ambrose.
My other matches are Lesnar heavy but come on you know he's gonna be in it.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jan 16, 2016 10:56:46 GMT -5
Having Triple H vs Roman at Fast Lane seems like a waste, but I think we are getting a Roman vs Lesnar rematch at WM. Seemed that way before, but Monday night more less proved it.
I know it's highly unlikely, but I just want something out of the box. Something no one sees coming.
|
|
|
Post by BROKEN on Jan 16, 2016 12:18:09 GMT -5
Phenomenal One
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 5:57:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2016 12:27:49 GMT -5
Of course Fastlane will be "must see" the year after I went to it live. Oh well, I was finally able to see Sting after all these years
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 5:57:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2016 12:30:14 GMT -5
I think it would be a waste to have the Reigns/HHH match at Fastlane. Let it be a non-title match at Wrestlemania. They need to bolster the card and that match can be big enough without the belt. Besides, it wouldn't make any logical sense to have HHH enter the Rumble as he could just as easily book himself a title match any time he wants on Raw or Smackdown. I expect HHH to be there, but not an entrant in the Rumble. But once again, the problem becomes who takes the belt if Reigns doesn't have it? So... You don't want the main title defended at WreatleMania? That will surely bolster the card.
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Jan 16, 2016 13:59:09 GMT -5
Brock vs Roman 2
|
|
|
Post by Midnight on Jan 16, 2016 14:05:26 GMT -5
What ever happens, I just hope it's phenomenal...
|
|