|
Post by tg11 on Jan 24, 2016 18:28:20 GMT -5
Personally don't you feel like the Royal Rumble Match you feel like there was a certain superstar who you thought deserved to win the Royal Rumble Match but felt like they never really did and they just gave it to someone else?
Well for me my list of Royal Rumble Match winners this is how I would have done it for each year:
1988- Jake "The Snake" Roberts if anything he was a much more over babyface than Hacksaw at the time and not to mention he could have probably have benefited from it more
1989- Either Million Dollar Man Ted DiBiase winning or I would have had it been Hogan or Savage
1990- Hogan in my opinion he definitely deserved to win the Royal Rumble Match that year so I would have kept it the exact same way as is but then if Hogan didn't win then I would have had it been Warrior
1991- Hogan definitely did not deserve to win a second straight Royal Rumble Match especially given the year before he won it but if Hogan didn't win this who would have? Personally I would have gone with Perfect
1992- With the title on the line who else but Ric Flair was going to really benefit? No one really so WWE at least from a booking standpoint actually got this one right so I would keep it the same as is
1993- Instead of Yokozuna winning the Royal Rumble Match I would have had it been either Savage, Backlund or Flair winning his 2nd Royal Rumble Match in a row back to back
1994- It was either going to be Bret or Luger either way so them going out as co-winners they should have just did what they did in 2005 with Cena/Batista sudden death overtime they should have done that with Bret and Luger and then we would have known definitely who deserved to win so that being said I would have gone with Bret
1995- Michaels personally he wasn't really ready to win that Royal Rumble Match and there were a lot more other favorites in there like British Bulldog, Luger or even Crush so that being said I would have gone with Luger considering 1994 which then I would have had him transition into a heel turn
1996- Michaels winning this I wouldn't change anything about it
1997- Austin winning definitely was the right call so I wouldn't have changed anything about it but instead of him winning in a sneaky fashion I would have had him win by coming from behind Hart after he eliminated whoever and then Austin wins that way rather than the way he actually won
1998- Austin I would have kept him as the winner so I wouldn't change this
1999- McMahon didn't need the Rumble win but instead of McMahon winning or even Austin winning I would have had Triple H winning or even Kane
2000- The Rock winning was definitely the right call
2001- Instead of Austin winning his 3rd Royal Rumble I would have had Kane win it or Rock winning back to back Royal Rumbles
2002- Triple H winning was always inevitable
2003- Same with Lesnar him winning was always inevitable
2004- Benoit knowing what I know now about him I wouldn't have had him win the Royal Rumble Match or hell even at the time Benoit didn't even deserve the win; I would have had Angle or Jericho win the Rumble or even Big Show
2005- Batista winning was always inevitable
2006- Just like Rey Mysterio winning was always inevitable
2007- Undertaker winning was also the right call
2008- Cena winning was also the right call too
2009- Instead of Orton winning the Royal Rumble Match I would have had it been Triple H winning his 2nd Royal Rumble Match
2010- Edge winning was definitely the right call
2011- Instead of Del Rio, I would have had Orton win the Royal Rumble Match or I would have had it been Wade Barrett because Barrett was at his peak with Nexus/Corre
2012- Jericho I would have had him win the Royal Rumble Match instead of Sheamus
2013- Instead of Cena winning I would have given the Royal Rumble Match win to either Ryback or even Ziggler
2014- Instead of Batista winning I would have had it been Sheamus as a surprise entrant or even Punk definitely Punk but with Batista instead of Del Rio being the one to eliminate Batista I would have had Batista been eliminated by Brock who wouldn't even be in the match to set up Lesnar/Batista
2015- Bryan should have won it
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:18:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2016 2:29:06 GMT -5
1997- Austin
1998- Austin
1999- Kane.
2000- The Rock, I guess. The Big Show saga never should've happened.
2001- Kane. Kane. Kane. Kane. Kane. Everything about this rumble should've been Kane.
2002- I wanted HHH to win so bad. But looking back, Angle winning would've been amazing for that story.
2003- Lesnar.
2004- Anyone but Benoit. Guy was NEVER entertaining. I'd go with Angle, and HHH/Angle/HBK at Mania.
2005- Batista
2006- Anyone but Mysterio. Orton preferably.
|
|
|
Post by mikey1974 on Jan 25, 2016 8:03:29 GMT -5
1988- I'm fine with Duggan. It didn't really mean anything at this point.
1989- DiBiase buys the #30 spot and goes on to win.
1990- Warrior, last eliminating Hogan. Sets him up as Hogan's biggest threat toward Mania VI.
1991- Hogan, to build toward Slaughter, who won the WWF Title at this same event.
1992- Flair,as did happen.
1993- Savage, as originally booked.
1994- I'm fine with the Bret-Luger double winner scenario
1995- Surprise entrant Sid wins, setting up the battle of the big men at Mania
1996- Would keep it the same with HBK
1997- also the same with Austin "winning"
1998- Again,same with Austin. If he DIDN'T win here, you would've had a riotous situation like when Bryan got eliminated at last year's Rumble
1999- Surprise entrant The Rock wins, setting himself up as his own competition,since he was already the Champion,and there will be no Title match at Mania XV. HBK comes out the next night and says as Commissioner that cannot fly, and Austin, as the last entrant eliminated, gets the Mania shot. then things go as they di with austin-McMahon with the Mania shot on the line.
2000- The Rock winning was fine.
|
|
|
Post by tg11 on Jan 25, 2016 9:49:36 GMT -5
1988- Jake The Snake Roberts last eliminating Andre The Giant
1989- Macho Man Randy Savage last eliminating Million Dollar Man Ted DiBiase
1990- Hogan last eliminating Perfect...now thinking about it I would keep this as is
1991- Perfect wins last eliminating Hogan...reverse of the year before marking a heel winning but Perfect eliminating Hogan from behind
1992- Flair but him last eliminating Hogan
1993- Savage wins by last eliminating Yokozuna in a herculean effort overcoming in a David vs Goliath scenario
1994- Bret Hart wins by last eliminating Lex Luger; no co winners, they fight it out after they both go out at the same time with the match being restarted
1995- Lex Luger wins by last eliminating Shawn Michaels since Luger was robbed the hear before but eventually sets up a Lex Luger heel turn to face Diesel
1996- Michaels still wins but in a shocker by returning the night of the PPV itself completely shocking everyone in the match by last eliminating Diesel
1997- Undertaker wins by last eliminating Bret after Bret eliminates Austin with the referees seeing it but Austin would try to come back into the ring to attack Bret but Bret would see him coming and Taker eliminates Bret from behind
1998- Austin still wins by last eliminating Rock
1999- Austin back to back by last eliminating Vince because Vince didn't need the win
2000- The Rock still wins by last eliminating Big Show
2001- Kane wins by last eliminating Austin
2002- Triple H still wins but he eliminates Austin in the final 2 instead of eliminating Angle
2003- Lesnar still wins by last eliminating Taker
2004- Kurt Angle wins by last eliminating Benoit in the final 2; Angle goes to Mania in the main event with Angle jumping brands to go to RAW to set up a Triple Threat Match with HHH and HBK but Angle at this time was just as hot as Benoit was
2005- Batista still wins by last eliminating Cena
2006- Rey Mysterio still wins but he eliminates Triple H last instead of Orton
2007- Undertaker still wins by last eliminating Michaels
2008- Cena still wins by last eliminating Triple H
2009- Triple H wins by last eliminating Orton
2010- Edge still wins but he eliminates Jericho last
2011- Christian wins as a surprise entrant by last eliminating Del Rio
2012- Jericho wins by last eliminating Orton
2013- Ryback wins by last eliminating Cena
2014- CM Punk wins by last eliminating Batista after Del Rio tries to get involved and Punk from behind eliminates Batista
2015- Roman Reigns wins but he does it as a surprise entrant in a shocker by last eliminating Bray Wyatt
2016- AJ Styles in his debut in his first Rumble wins to become WWE World Heavyweight Champion by last eliminating Roman Reigns after Triple H gets involved after Reigns eliminates Triple H since Ambrose would be eliminated by Sheamus
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:18:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2016 9:59:30 GMT -5
Styles was never going to win the rumble in his first match, but he should have been in the final 4. His elimination so early on REALLY pissed me off.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:18:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2016 14:03:24 GMT -5
1990 I would have given it to Roddy Piper.
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Jan 25, 2016 14:13:12 GMT -5
1988 - Ultimate Warrior
1989 - Hulk Hogan
1990 - Mr. Perfect
1991 - British Bulldog
1992 - Ric Flair
1993 - Randy Savage
1994 - Lex Luger
1995 - Shawn Michaels
1996 - Shawn Michaels
1997 - Bret Hart
1998 - Steve Austin
1999 - Triple H
2000 - The Rock
2001 - Steve Austin
2002 - Triple H
2003 - Brock Lesnar
2004 - Chris Benoit
2005 - Randy Orton (even though he had a title match in the actual RR 2005 event, he should have been in the Rumble to win that right)
2006 - Triple H (Rey clearly won it because Eddie had died)
2007 - Undertaker
2008 - John Cena
2009 - Randy Orton
2010 - Shawn Michaels (only if Edge wasn't cleared, the fact he was cleared to wrestle and won the Rumble was awesome)
2011 - John Cena
2012 - Chris Jericho
2013 - Ryback (the guy was legit over like crazy then!)
2014 - Daniel Bryan
2015 - Roman Reigns (but they shouldn't have pushed him down our throats to make us hate him during that time frame)
2016 - Triple H
For me, not a lot would have changed for the winners. Over all, I never had any real issues with the actual winners of the Rumble event anyhow.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Jan 25, 2016 14:20:55 GMT -5
I'll only post the years that I would have changed something
1989 - Ted Dibiase 1990 - Ultimate Warrior 1993 - Macho Man (Savage would have then lost to Bret at Mania, cementing Bret as the new man of the company) 1994 - Just Bret 2008 - Triple H 2012 - Chris Jericho 2013 - Ryback 2014 - Daniel Bryan
I'd keep 2015 as Reigns, but I would have booked everything, including the build up, much differently. Personally, I wish Kane won the 2001 Rumble considering his performance, but Austin/Rock made the most sense at Mania.
|
|
|
Post by ricflair4ever on Jan 26, 2016 12:37:05 GMT -5
Several Rumbles got it right. But heres the ones i would have changed. Some for personal reasons, some for better booking.
88 -Jake Roberts for sure 89 - I'm ok with Studd winning, but i think DiBiase could have benefited from the heat off of buying #30 and winning the whole thing. 90 - Ultimate Warrior 93 - Savage was the original plan. So it would either be him, or Flair as my pick. With Flair being on the way out thanks to Perfect, i think it would have made for compelling story telling to get a new #1 contender before Mania. 94 - Bret Hart 95 - Lex Luger.....heel turn 99 - Austin 2012 - Chris Jericho 2013 - Ryback 2014 - CM Punk 2015 - On one hand i go with Daniel Bryan. But knowing the health risks , i can see how that might've been a mistake. On the other hand Roman was a good choice that might have been salvaged if booked differently than it was,
|
|
|
Post by UltimateCollector78 on Jan 26, 2016 13:09:34 GMT -5
- 1989 Million Dollar Man, why did they give it to Studd is a head scratching decision
- 1990 Warrior, why have the WWE champion even in the match
- 1993 Macho Man, instead of commentary he should have tore it down with Bret in the main event of WM9 and put Bret over.
- 1999 Mankind, he would win the Rumble but would lose or use his shot before WM 15.
- 2006 anyone EXCPET Rey, he could win any match just not one where you have to outlast 29 others buy not being thrown out. Hard to suspend disbelief on this one.
- 2011 CM Punk, a Nexus led Punk helps him win the match and he would face Edge or have a 3 way with Cena and Miz at WM27
- 2012 Jericho, he would still face Punk at WM28 and lose
- 2013 Ryback, he was WAY over and should have one this one and crushed Del Rio at WM29. Rock Cena 2 could of still happened without Cena wining this Rumble
- 2014 Daniel Brayn, Batista should not have been in the match and should have been better used debuting after the Rumble
|
|
👑🇵🇭⭐️
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
King Of The Ring 2007 - Team Undisputed
Joined on: Feb 4, 2013 13:46:47 GMT -5
Posts: 4,708
|
Post by 👑🇵🇭⭐️ on Jan 26, 2016 14:15:48 GMT -5
Here is my list of changes.
1988 – Andre The Giant – It’s the Royal Rumble!! Andre The Giant should have drawn number 1 or number 20 and won the entire thing. Either that or Andre The Giant and the Million Dollar Man should have been the final two SuperStars in the ring, then Virgil hands Ted DiBiase a bag full of money, who then proceeds to give it to Andre to buy the win.
1989 – Hulk Hogan – This should have been the setup to the Mega Powers Exploding.
1990 – Ultimate Warrior – This should have been the first match that the Ultimate Warrior wins and Hulk Hogan loses, to plant the seeds for WrestleMania VI.
1997 – The Undertaker – Since Bret the Hitman Hart and Stone Cold Steve Austin faced each other at WrestleMania 13 anyway, they should have let the Undertaker win and go on to face the eventual WWE Champion, Sycho Sid.
1999 – Stone Cold Steve Austin – There was really no point in having Vince McMahon win the Royal Rumble, but it is what it is.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:18:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2016 15:25:18 GMT -5
Matt Damon
|
|
|
Post by Nivro™ on Jan 28, 2016 21:49:53 GMT -5
'88- Ultimate Warrior (Everyone just seemed to be mid-lower mid card status and he really was the up & comer of the group) '89- Ted DiBiase (sets up DiBiase vs Savage) '90- Ultimate Warrior (sets up Warrior vs Hogan) '91- Hulk Hogan (sets up Hogan vs Slaughter) '92- Ric Flair (WM VIII would be switched to Flair vs Hogan) '93- Macho Man (but I change the Main event of Mania to Savage vs Flair as I would have held Flair over till Summer) '94- Lex Luger (sets up Luger vs Yokozuna) '95- Shawn Michaels (sets up Diesel vs HBK) '96- Shawn Michaels (sets up Bret vs HBK) '97- Big Van Vader (sets up Vader vs HBK) '98- Steve Austin (sets up Austin vs HBK) '99- Steve Austin (sets up Austin vs Rock) '00- The Rock (sets up Triple H vs Rock)
After that....I really wouldnt have cared who won
|
|
Jonny Flashback
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 30, 2014 10:55:59 GMT -5
Posts: 1,430
|
Post by Jonny Flashback on Jan 29, 2016 8:06:09 GMT -5
Definitely an interesting tread. Presuming that history of my picks did not affect the next Rumble my picks would be:
1988 - Andre wins the first rumble to put it over.
1989 - Hulk Hogan definitely. He eliminates Macho after Macho saves Hogan leading to the WM match.
1990 - Ultimate Warrior - as a way to set up the title match at WM6. Hogan had no business winning this one.
1991 - Hulk Hogan - the right call was made on this one.
1992 - Ric Flair - again the right call.
1993 - Randy Savage. Bret vs Savage at WM could have been one of the best ever
1994 - Bret or Lex. Actually love the co-winners thing here as we got Bret vs Owen as well as Bret winning the title later. Right call.
1995 - Going back and forth between Owen Hart and Shawn Michaels. Yes Shawn was feuding with Diesel but Owen winning would add to his bragging rights after KOTR and would be an interesting match with Diesel.
1996 - Shawn Michaels definitely the right call here and winning it for the first time would make it more special
1997 - Bret Hart. Hart wins to set up the rematch against Shawn
1998 - Stone Cold. Definitely his time.
1999 - I like Vince here. Keeps things fresh rather than having the obvious choice of Austin winning
2000 - The Rock - again the right call.
2001 - Anyone's game here. But I think Austin was the right call. Austin vs Kurt in the main event would've been just as good as The Rock.
2002 - Yeah Triple H
2003 - Brock
2004 - Benoit
2005 - Batista
2006 - I don't like Rey winning here. Randy Orton for this one.
2007 - Undertaker
2008 - CM Punk, to get over the ECW brand
2009 - The story of Evolution teaming up to eliminate all was good but I'd have Triple H overcoming the odds
2010 - Edge returning to win was perfect
2011 - CM Punk - New Nexus dominates
2012 - Chris Jericho. Sheamus only won cos Jericho was obvious. Sometimes obvious is good.
2013 - Ryback. But would not have had him vs Punk until Mania
2014 - A lot would say Bryan but I think him not being in this Rumble works better for the storyline. That said, it shouldn't have been Batista either. I would have Reigns win to look dominant and have Triple H do what he did this year. The heat if he came out at 30 instead of Bryan would have been insane. Plus Reigns winning instead of Triple H would put him over huge - at the right time!
2015 - Roman Reigns. I just don't see Daniel Bryan vs Brock working as good as Roman
2016 - I like Triple H winning .
Interesting little exercise this
|
|
|
Post by tg11 on Jan 29, 2016 8:16:39 GMT -5
1988- The Million Dollar Man Ted DiBiase- With DiBiase winning I would either have him come into the first ever 20 man Royal Rumble Match either as #1 or better yet have him come out as #20 and then like whoever suggested if it is him and let's say another heel in the final 2 doesn't matter who but DiBiase basically buys the win by handing the superstar the briefcase full of money and the superstar who is in the final 2 with him sacrifices themselves by walking over the top rope and to the floor
Could you imagine the heat DiBiase would get by winning the Rumble? And not to mention at the time there was no WWF Champion if you remember because of the whole tournament thing but DiBiase he ended up in the tournament final that year at WrestleMania IV so
But as for who would be eliminated last in this match? None other than Andre the Giant
1989- Hulk Hogan by last eliminating Randy Savage in the final 2 after Hogan eliminates The Million Dollar Man Ted DiBiase last year's winner Savage the WWF Champion from behind tries to eliminate Hogan but Hogan sees it coming which basically sets up the tension between the Mega Powers as they then fight out with Hogan eventually eliminating his Mega Powers tag team partner and WWF Champion Savage to win it all basically setting up Hogan/Savage WrestleMania 5 for the WWF Championship
1990- Ultimate Warrior- With Warrior winning this Royal Rumble Match he would make history essentially as the first ever WWF Intercontinental Champion to win the Royal Rumble Match but who would Warrior eliminate last to win the Royal Rumble Match? He would eliminate none other than last year's Royal Rumble Match winner that being the WWF Champion Hogan and especially after the seeds were built with that iconic staredown I mean how could you not capitalize on that?
1991- Hulk Hogan- Even though on my revised list he won the 1989 Royal Rumble Match he would go on to win this one his 2nd Royal Rumble Match in 3 years by winning this one but as for who Hogan would eliminate last to win this? I would have him eliminate The Model Rick Martel who would surpass the 53 minute mark and make it all the way to the final 2 where it would like he would win it all but somehow Hogan would stay in the match with Hogan somehow skinning the cat even though Hogan is a big guy he would somehow do it and come back into the ring while Martel thinks he's won Hogan turns him around and they fight it out which eventually leads to Hogan eliminating him
1992- Flair winning was the right call because even though you had an array of talent probably the most star studded Rumble at that time and the fact that it was for the title Flair winning was probably inevitable anyway so why change it? But at the same time though instead of Flair eliminating Justice last from behind I would have had Flair eliminate Hogan from behind after Sid would basically turn heel on Hogan for eliminating him...Flair from behind takes Hogan out and not to mention with Monsoon and Heenan on commentary here I mean this match was perfect
Plus it would set up Flair as the WWF Champion going into Mania 8 but as for who would face him? Instead of it being Savage I would have had it been Hogan setting up the dream match I know we all wanted to see
1993- I would have given it to Savage hands down because not only was Savage originally booked to win the Royal Rumble Match before they gave the win practically to Yokozuna with Savage winning he would go on to WrestleMania 9 in the main event where then he would face the WWF Champion Bret Hart and I know everyone else would have rather have seen that as a main event than what we originally got in real life with Yoko/Bret and then Yoko/Hogan which was all a clusterf***
But as for who Savage would eliminate last? None other than Yokozuna
1994- Bret "The Hitman" Hart- Definitely would have given this to Bret because you would have thought that the Royal Rumble Match win would have done wonders for Lex Luger that it would have elevated him towards the title but it didn't it did nothing for Luger so that is why I would have just had Bret win it but basically have him eliminate Luger last which basically would set up Bret/Yokozuna either way in either scenario
1995- Lex Luger- I would have given it to Luger here basically to set up his redemption for last year where he was eliminated in the final 2 by Bret basically Luger would win this to eventually set up a heel turn for Luger which is what I would have done in the sense of him winning it as a babyface but making that transition into being a heel to face Diesel because Shawn at this time even though he was a rising star he wasn't ready for the Mania main event like let's be honest but I would have had Luger eliminate either HBK or Bulldog in the final 2
1996- This was always going to be the year of Shawn Michaels so why change history? But however for 1996 Shawn would be winning this for the first time but as a babyface here but I would have had Shawn come back at the Royal Rumble pay per view itself in the Royal Rumble Match but as a surprise entrant in the sense that no one hears from him for months no vignettes hyping his return just an unexpected return shocking everyone and as for who Michaels would eliminate last? None other than his best friend Diesel which I wouldn't change but it would still set up Bret/HBK either way
1997- The Undertaker- Austin as much as he deserved it even if it was under screwy controversial circumstances Austin was nowhere near ready for the main event while Taker on the other hand he was and not to mention Sid was the WWF Champion so with Taker winning the Royal Rumble Match it would have set up Sid/Taker either way while with Austin he would still eliminate Bret under screwy controversial circumstances but Taker would eliminate Austin last to win this
1998- Stone Cold Steve Austin- This was always going to be the year of Austin no matter what so why change history here? Austin being a marked man in this Royal Rumble Match was perfect but what I would have done is that I would have had Austin draw #1 and have him be the first guy out there and have him be the last man standing after all is said and done Austin would still win by still eliminating Rock but he would start out the match first pretty much making history by being the first guy to be the first one in there and being the last one to leave
1999- Stone Cold Steve Austin- Why they gave the win to Vince now that made no sense to me at all because Vince didn't need it and not to mention the Royal Rumble Match win did nothing for Vince while for Austin it would have benefited him more to win this and on my list Austin winning back to back here it would be much deserved but as for who Austin would eliminate last I would have him eliminate Vince last
With Austin winning his 2nd Royal Rumble Match here Austin would make history again because he would do it from spot #1 yet again since on my list he would have done it in 1998 as #1 and then 1999 as #1 he wins it again but eliminates Vince last basically showing us that he would have earned it
2000- The Rock winning was the right call and with Rock winning this it would set up him facing Triple H at WrestleMania 2000 for the title but as for who Rock would eliminate last he would still eliminate Big Show but no WrestleMania 2000 Fatal 4 Way nonsense
2001- Kane- This Royal Rumble Match screamed Kane's name as far as him winning it I mean come on he eliminated 11 people and not to mention Kane at this time he was a monster he was a beast so why not give him the win here? With Kane who would he eliminate last? He would eliminate Austin last but as for who it would set up Kane to face at Mania that year? Kane at Mania 17 he would have been in the main event but I would have had it been a Triple Threat Match with him, Austin and Rock
2002- Triple H winning was inevitable it was the right call so I wouldn't change anything here but as for who I would have Triple H eliminate last? Still Kurt Angle so I wouldn't change anything here
2003- Lesnar winning too was not only inevitable but it was the right call so I wouldn't change anything here either just like him eliminating Taker last I wouldn't change that either because it would still set up Lesnar/Angle Mania 19 which was a classic if you ask me
2004- Instead of Benoit winning this I would have had Jericho or Angle winning this preferably Kurt Angle by him eliminating Benoit last because Benoit he definitely did not deserve the Royal Rumble Match victory that's for sure because yeah even though he did get a push towards the title how long did his push really last? While with Angle winning this one it would have set up Angle/Guerrero either way
2005- Batista winning was the right call so I wouldn't change anything here just like how him eliminating Cena last after overtime restart I wouldn't change that either and plus it sets up Batista/HHH perfectly so
2006- Rey Mysterio whether we all like it or not him winning was the right call and I don't care what no one says because Rey deserved it I mean he spent over an hour and 2 minutes of hell here in this match especially for a guy his size to last that long in the Royal Rumble Match and especially from spot #2 no less but as for who he would eliminate last? Rather than eliminate Orton last I would have had him eliminate Triple H last because by him doing that it would basically cement Rey as a main event guy but also it would set up Mysterio/Angle/Orton either way so
2007- Undertaker winning was the right call just like how I wouldn't have changed who he eliminated last that being Shawn Michaels because it sets up Taker/Batista perfectly
2008- Cena winning was the right call because it was a surprise that no one saw coming and think about how emotional the Royal Rumble Match victory was too but for Cena I wouldn't have had him waste the shot at No Way Out I would have had him use it at Mania 24 but instead of Orton having the title at No Way Out I would have had him drop it in the RAW Chamber with having Orton to defend his title inside the RAW Chamber against Triple H, Jericho, Hardy, JBL and Umaga with Triple H coming out on top beating Orton which then would have set up Orton to have his rematch clause for Mania then throw in Cena which would have set up the Triple Threat either way
2009- Orton winning was the right call yet again given how he destroyed the McMahons on the Road to Mania but also given the fact that at this time Orton was white hot too because of Legacy being formed with Rhodes and DiBiase so giving Orton the win here was actually smart on WWE's part and him eliminating Triple H last from the Royal Rumble Match especially from behind was perfect heel tactic
2010- Edge winning was the right call but as for who he would eliminate last? Instead of him eliminating Cena last I would have had him eliminate Jericho last because I would have had them in the final 2 fighting it out with Edge still winning but then Jericho would somehow still win the title before Mania which then would set up Edge to win the title at Mania which is what I would have done
2011- Instead of Del Rio winning the 40 Man Royal Rumble Match I would have given it to Wade Barrett because at this time Barrett was white hot because not only did he have Nexus in 2010 he also had The Corre too so I would have had The Corre members helping him in this match with Barrett eliminating Orton last which would set up Barrett to face either Edge for the World Heavyweight Championship or to face Miz and Cena in a Triple Threat I would have had Barrett/Edge which would have made for a much better match
2012- Jericho should have been given the win here hell it should have been gift wrapped here because with Sheamus winning the Royal Rumble Match it didn't really do much for Sheamus while for Jericho it would have given him the heat he desperately needed especially against Punk because with Jericho winning it would have still set up him vs Punk Best in the World vs Best in the World at Mania for the title but as for who Jericho would eliminate last to win? I would have had him eliminate Orton last as revenge for Orton punting him in the skull Jericho eliminates Orton in his hometown of St. Louis at the Rumble
2013- Ryback should have won this because Ryback was not only white hot at the time but also with him winning it would have done wonders for Ryback it would have cemented him as a main event guy too think about it because with him winning Ryback could have decided to jump shows and go to Smackdown challenge for the World Heavyweight Championship which would have set up Ryback to face Big Show because I would have had Big Show still champion which would have set up Ryback to take the title from Show at Mania 29
2014- CM Punk- I would have given the Royal Rumble Match win here to CM Punk and why I say this? Because Daniel Bryan even though he was red hot at the time Bryan was competing in a match earlier on in the Royal Rumble PPV against Wyatt and not only that but it wouldn't have been realistic for Bryan to be in the Royal Rumble Match especially given that Bryan was injured concussion like symptoms from what I can remember so him winning wouldn't have been realistic
While with Punk winning it would have been more realistic because Punk he was what the #2 babyface in the company besides Bryan at the time that if he won it I don't think people would have had a problem with it and Punk winning he probably would have stayed with the company rather than going to UFC
Punk who would he eliminate last? Punk would eliminate Batista last after Del Rio would try to come back into the ring to try to attack Batista setting up a distraction which would cause Punk to take advantage therefore winning the match Punk goes on to Mania in the main event where he would face Orton and then you add Bryan into the mix
2015- Roman Reigns now that I think about it Roman Reigns winning actually kind of was the right call by WWE when you think about it but the way they went about it was all wrong but as for Reigns winning I would have delayed his return until the actual Royal Rumble PPV itself by having him return on the night of the PPV in the Royal Rumble Match as a surprise entrant and no one having any idea that he is in the match much less in the building he returns in a shocker as he still goes on to Mania but Reigns who would he eliminate last? He would eliminate Bryan last
2016- Brock Lesnar- I would have had The Beast The Conqueror win this becoming the new WWE World Heavyweight Champion because the win here has practically done nothing for Triple H because Triple H he doesn't need to be champion but is and all to feed his own ego
While with Brock winning it would reiterate the fact that he is a Beast that he is a Conqueror and not to mention Brock winning it would set up your Mania main event with Brock eliminating Reigns last after Reigns he would eliminate Triple H as a way to stick it to The Authority
Brock from behind eliminates Reigns to win it all
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Jan 29, 2016 8:45:30 GMT -5
Why have you gave your answer 3 different times with different winners?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:18:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2016 0:39:14 GMT -5
How about this? Change it to the Royal Rumble winner ALSO gets a shot at WM! Even from 1988!
1988 since it was the tournament you could have Roberts win it and turn heel saying he didn´t get his shot because of the tournament. It could have been a good storyline. He was redhot then and there was talk of doing Hogan vs. Roberts.
1989 hogan- Since he did challenge Savage for the title at WM5
1990 Warrior- He challenged for the title at WM6
1991- Have Savage win it. 3 way between Slaughter, Savage and Hogan at WM7
1992- Flair all the way
1993- Yoko
1994- Love the co winners idea
1995- this one is a toughy. Lex Lugar- He turns heel right after. Would be a good WM match.
1996- Shawn Micheals
1997- UT- he did challenge SID at WM 13
1998- HAD to be Austin again.
1999- rock
Beyond those years I really don´t care.
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Jan 31, 2016 7:01:48 GMT -5
While I have watched them all I honestly couldn't tell you who was in or won any of them anymore...so I won't even try and adjust them in any way.
|
|