bab2781
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Mar 11, 2015 13:07:36 GMT -5
Posts: 139 
|
Post by bab2781 on Feb 22, 2016 20:38:13 GMT -5
Your kidding me right? Taker vs. Shane McMahon in a HIAC at WrestleMania 32. Yeah this WrestleMania is gonna suck...lol
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 2:26:31 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2016 22:40:04 GMT -5
I'm  ing excited. Section 132 Row 2 Seat 1 |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 2:26:31 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2016 22:41:31 GMT -5
I'm not sure how I feel about Shane vs The Undertaker It's a very odd choice.
|
|
|
|
Post by jakks1996collector on Feb 22, 2016 23:23:13 GMT -5
Shane McMahon vs Undertaker would have been a killer match in 2001.
15 years later, it's odd and has no meaning.
Can't complain for a $10.00 pay per view.
|
|
|
|
Post by tylerbreezee on Feb 22, 2016 23:26:33 GMT -5
Sorry but if you don't think Shane vs. Undertaker in HIAC is gonna be amazing, entertainment wise of course, definitely not for the wrestling than you shouldn't be watching WWE. Triple H vs. Reigns has my attention now that we see who the crowd is gonna side with. Ambrose vs. Lesnar is gonna be one hell of a street fight, I can see it going into the parking lot or at least into the concession or backstage area.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Feb 22, 2016 23:31:06 GMT -5
I honestly have no belief that Shane McMahon will be the one wrestling that match. John Cena or somebody else will replace him. And that will be for the best.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Feb 22, 2016 23:35:11 GMT -5
Sorry but if you don't think Shane vs. Undertaker in HIAC is gonna be amazing, entertainment wise of course, definitely not for the wrestling than you shouldn't be watching WWE. Triple H vs. Reigns has my attention now that we see who the crowd is gonna side with. Ambrose vs. Lesnar is gonna be one hell of a street fight, I can see it going into the parking lot or at least into the concession or backstage area. You realize how long of a walk it would take to get from the field level of that stadium up to the concessions and back to the ring? |
|
|
|
Post by P@ul on Feb 23, 2016 0:03:57 GMT -5
Shane vs Taker is going to be the definition of "entertainment." The street fight between Ambrose/Brock will be fantastic. Charlotte/Becky/Banks will be excellent. Give me a cruiserweight championship battle royal, Dudley/Uso table match (Pre-show), Owens/Wyatt and Y2AJ/New Day for the tag team championships and we'll be set.
|
|
|
|
Post by bigshab421 on Feb 23, 2016 0:06:25 GMT -5
Eh, this Shane/Taker match is so damn random it makes zero sense. Why did Vince pick Undertaker, the compnay's most beloved character to go against Shane?
If they don't write out Shane with an injury and have him chose a replacement then I could say this is the most all time random Manoa match ever
|
|
torriefan4life
Superstar
Joined on: Mar 9, 2012 13:27:48 GMT -5
Posts: 812
|
Post by torriefan4life on Feb 23, 2016 0:14:36 GMT -5
Shane Vs Taker does nothing for me. It makes no sense and why waste Taker against Shane? You could have Taker wrestle a young guy who needs that rub, and have Shane wrestle someone else. I just don't like the idea of a Taker Vs Shane match.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 2:26:31 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2016 0:46:39 GMT -5
Shane Vs Taker does nothing for me. It makes no sense and why waste Taker against Shane? You could have Taker wrestle a young guy who needs that rub, and have Shane wrestle someone else. I just don't like the idea of a Taker Vs Shane match. I agree taker vs Shane is just so random to me like it's a match I never expected to happen but feels like a match I expect WWE 2k16 My universe would do. |
|
|
|
Post by tylerbreezee on Feb 23, 2016 1:51:56 GMT -5
Sorry but if you don't think Shane vs. Undertaker in HIAC is gonna be amazing, entertainment wise of course, definitely not for the wrestling than you shouldn't be watching WWE. Triple H vs. Reigns has my attention now that we see who the crowd is gonna side with. Ambrose vs. Lesnar is gonna be one hell of a street fight, I can see it going into the parking lot or at least into the concession or backstage area. You realize how long of a walk it would take to get from the field level of that stadium up to the concessions and back to the ring? I forgot where they were gonna be lol |
|
bab2781
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Mar 11, 2015 13:07:36 GMT -5
Posts: 139
|
Post by bab2781 on Feb 23, 2016 1:53:03 GMT -5
Sorry Vince your not selling out that stadium...lol
|
|
rudos
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 22, 2009 4:06:01 GMT -5
Posts: 1,418
|
Post by rudos on Feb 23, 2016 1:57:35 GMT -5
After watching the Ambrose beat down on Raw, I pray they don't have him challenge Lesnar every week. I would have Lesnar deny him a match right up until the week or two before while in the meantime Heyman scouts for challengers for the beast and overlooks Ambrose.
I have nothing to say about undertaker vs shane. They are really scraping the bottom of the barrel if that's the best they can offer...
|
|
|
|
Post by BOOKER_T on Feb 23, 2016 2:17:30 GMT -5
I'm ing excited. Section 132 Row 2 Seat 1 Awesome ,Hope you have fun Who you looking forward to seeing the most |
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Lime Green Jello! on Feb 23, 2016 2:37:03 GMT -5
After Raw, Wrestlemania became even more worth watching. Bring on April 3rd.
|
|
|
|
Post by adzy on Feb 23, 2016 5:43:16 GMT -5
Got an idea for Shane v Taker. Taker shows up and says he will not fight for Vince, he doesn't respect him he never asked permission before putting him in a match at Mania. They argue then out comes Strowman to lay out Taker. Basically we get Taker w/ Shane vs Strowman w/ Vince for control of WWE.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sexy Psychotic on Feb 23, 2016 6:29:53 GMT -5
People keep saying "why did Vince choose Taker", you do realise that this is supposed to stop Shane getting control of the company right? Kayfabe-wise, who else is seen as such an imposing force as Taker is? Plus, he's the longest contracted, most loyal member of the roster that Vince has; if he is gonna put his company in anyone's hands, its gonna be the Deadman!
Thinking about it now I wish that maybe they had given this a week or so to stew, or another segment last night to really let what Shane was asking burn in instead of just going straight forward and blowing like 3 major announcements in one 30-minute slot.
|
|
|
|
Post by bigshab421 on Feb 23, 2016 6:45:59 GMT -5
People keep saying "why did Vince choose Taker", you do realise that this is supposed to stop Shane getting control of the company right? Kayfabe-wise, who else is seen as such an imposing force as Taker is? Plus, he's the longest contracted, most loyal member of the roster that Vince has; if he is gonna put his company in anyone's hands, its gonna be the Deadman! Thinking about it now I wish that maybe they had given this a week or so to stew, or another segment last night to really let what Shane was asking burn in instead of just going straight forward and blowing like 3 major announcements in one 30-minute slot. Still it does not make sense. Even Shane v. Bray Wyatt or even the entire Wyatt Family would have made more sense |
|
|
|
Post by TheChamp420 on Feb 23, 2016 7:03:42 GMT -5
What does everybody think about this? Do you actually think it's going to happen?
So, in my opinion, if wwe wanted to do Cena VS Taker, they needed to create a story behind it...could this just be the beginning of that story? We have like 6 weeks to build to that.....I'm just ending up picturing Cena w/Shand VS Taker w/Vince ala Battle of the Billionaires a few years back
|
|
