Deleted
Joined on: Sept 24, 2024 6:21:01 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2016 21:50:48 GMT -5
Why did Vince just check out Ambrose
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 24, 2024 6:21:01 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2016 21:50:53 GMT -5
Bad booking. He can be salvaged if he squashes Kalisto at WM, though. And yes. Wrestling by itself doesn't draw. He was undeniably over as heck in 2012. If they hadn't messed him up so many times he'd be a much bigger deal. Why ruin Kalisto's push, a new guy who's riding a wave of momentum into the company, just to save Ryback, a guy who's been here for four years? And if the IC Title thing with Bryan couldnt save him, this won't either. I don't even like Kalisto so
|
|
|
Post by JCF on Mar 21, 2016 21:51:03 GMT -5
For Philly, this crowd ing sucks
|
|
|
Post by tylerbreezee on Mar 21, 2016 21:51:03 GMT -5
How can Vince think Christian looks ratty but not feel the same way about Dean Ambrose
|
|
|
Post by Booger Red on Mar 21, 2016 21:51:05 GMT -5
DEAN ING AMBROSE
|
|
|
Post by cmiller79 on Mar 21, 2016 21:51:05 GMT -5
So Shane gonna retire taker???
|
|
|
Post by Calcifer Boheme on Mar 21, 2016 21:51:16 GMT -5
So if Taker loses, this is his last Mania?
How were they able to make me less interested in this match!?!?!
|
|
|
Post by kazoosandstreamers on Mar 21, 2016 21:51:20 GMT -5
Looks like this will be Taker's out then.
|
|
|
Post by Sizzle on Mar 21, 2016 21:51:25 GMT -5
I'm torn af. I want Shane to win, but I love Taker.
|
|
|
Post by Rontaro13 on Mar 21, 2016 21:51:32 GMT -5
Yeah, Undertaker/Shane will go on last. If that's true, then bye-bye Undertaker unfortunately.
|
|
|
Post by c-scope on Mar 21, 2016 21:51:32 GMT -5
So Shane gonna retire taker??? I think so
|
|
|
Post by KeBen Owens on Mar 21, 2016 21:51:43 GMT -5
Vince was like "who's this fan?"
|
|
|
Post by tylerbreezee on Mar 21, 2016 21:51:58 GMT -5
Why did Vince just check out Ambrose He's realizing that it's Ambrose he needs in his life. Not Reigns.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 24, 2024 6:21:01 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2016 21:52:36 GMT -5
So wait. Let me understand this. Undertaker gets beat by Shane and it's his last mania. You're telling me Bray Wyatt wasn't better suited for this last year. Good ing Lord.
|
|
|
Post by #DI-WHY? on Mar 21, 2016 21:53:06 GMT -5
Why ruin Kalisto's push, a new guy who's riding a wave of momentum into the company, just to save Ryback, a guy who's been here for four years? And if the IC Title thing with Bryan couldnt save him, this won't either. I don't even like Kalisto so That's fine, it's your opinion. But from a logical standpoint, it wouldn't make sense either.
|
|
|
Post by Booger Red on Mar 21, 2016 21:53:07 GMT -5
If The Undertaker gets retired by Shane McMahon, then
|
|
|
Post by KeBen Owens on Mar 21, 2016 21:53:12 GMT -5
Why did Vince just check out Ambrose He's realizing that it's Ambrose he needs in his life. Not Reigns. Or wondering how a random drunk fan got entrance music.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 24, 2024 6:21:01 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2016 21:53:23 GMT -5
So wait. Let me understand this. Undertaker gets beat by Shane and it's his last mania. You're telling me Bray Wyatt wasn't better suited for this last year. Good ing Lord. WHY COULDN'T IT HAVE BEEN STING?!
|
|
|
Post by Todd Pettengill on Mar 21, 2016 21:53:27 GMT -5
I'm ready for Bates motel. I'm ready to do some form of bating to some pictures of Becky Lynch
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Mar 21, 2016 21:53:52 GMT -5
Is it safe to say that Hell in a Cell will go on last? It should go on first so that train wreck can be cleansed from our minds early I'd prefer if Roman Reigns versus Triple H opened WrestleMania so they can get Roman Reigns winning the title out of the way.
|
|