Could WM32 be the worst WrestleMania of the Modern Era?

29 and 27 were both pretty terrible outside a match or two.

I don't see this being worse.

We said that last year, and it turned out to be a good show. After eating my words, and growing up in terms of how I look at the WWE, I think it'll be fine. Let's wait to see how the show is before we judge it, you know?

Besides the HHH vs Roman, which to be honest is passable and not as bad as peoole act, what else on the card is bad?.

I cant imagine how some can say a Mania with Styles vs Jericho, Brock vs Ambrose, a 6 man ladder match with Zayn and Owens, a 3 way womens match between the 3 best in the company, and a HIAC with major stakes could be the worst ever.

Definitely not.

While I'm keeping an open mind with the actual event - it's definitely the worst "Road To WrestleMania" that I can ever remember. Absolutely zero "sizzle" as Jim Ross would say.... the excitement level is just not there. I'm absolutely shocked that they couldn't get a match out of Austin, Rock, or HBK..... this 'Mania is sorely lacking a returning "Legend". If The Rock's not going to wrestle, I'd almost rather he not even be involved.

Last night's RAW was an abomination, missing 'Taker/Shane/Brock, and barely having HHH (the friggin' Champion) on the show..... with so few key players, how can WWE afford to have so many main eventers absent from the show?

It' when my expectations are at their lowest that I tend to be pleasantly surprised with wrestling events - and my expectations could not be lower for WrestleMania 32..... so let's go, WWE! Surprise me!

It's lacking in star power but there's like 3-4 matches that could be pretty good, which is basically all you need for a decent Wrestlemania. Just throw in a swerve somewhere and everything's gonna be fine. It's not gonna be WM 17, 19, or even 21, but it has to beat 29 and 27.

27 was awful and 25 with the exception of Taker/Michaels is up there as an all time worse too.

32 will be fine. Sure the matches have no excitement around them and if they do, it is for the wrong reasons, BUT I am sure it will be good match wise

Let's wait until after the show is over before we consider it the worst in modern era. Last year I remember people saying, "Oh, this Wrestlemania is going to suck". Heck, I think I even thought the show would suck because the build was one of the worst I could remember. I'm going into this year's Wrestlemania enjoying it for what it is. As long as I'm entertained by most of the show, considering I'm going this year, I'll be happy with this. Last year, I kept my hopes low and I ended up enjoying it way more than I should. There's a couple of matches this year that I could care less for. Honestly, half the card is either so and so or bathroom break material, but the card could be way worse. Had all the guys we would look forward to not been injured, the show would be looked at much better than it is. I still believe had Seth Rollins not been injured, Rollins would have been champion for a year, and lost the belt to Roman Reigns at Mania. WWE did pick the worst year to pick a 100,000 seat stadium for Mania, but let's see how the show is before judging

Yes, it could be the worst WrestleMania ever. But it would be idiotic of us all to go in expecting/hoping for that. There's definitely enough on that card to be extremely enjoyable. The three top matches should be great, and the rest of it looks like it could be fun too. If we're determined to not enjoy it, it's best we don't watch it. There are better ways to spend those hours instead of watching a TV show you don't like.