Daria
Main Eventer
?¿
Joined on: Apr 10, 2012 10:08:56 GMT -5
Posts: 1,238
|
Post by Daria on May 10, 2016 18:14:07 GMT -5
So with the brand split does that mean we'd get the world heavy weight back?
|
|
|
Post by Jonathan Karate on May 10, 2016 18:24:55 GMT -5
Looks like they will try and load up Summerslam and make up for Mania. Main event needs to be Rollins/Reigns Yep that should be the main event at SummerSlam with Reigns as the heel and Rollins as the babyface.The other big time matches at SummerSlam this year should be Brock/Orton,Styles/Cena for the IC or US Title and then Charlotte/Bayley for the Women's Title. Charlotte/Sasha dawggg
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on May 10, 2016 18:50:30 GMT -5
Besides a few, I think the current roster is fantastic. Problem is, they just don't utilize enough of them. At least not to their fullest potential. - Stop with the 50/50 booking. The only people that have really gone on to become stars are the ones that either didn't get 50/50 booked (Shield) or broke free of it (Bryan, Punk) - Give us more character development. You have a three hour Raw and two hour Smackdown. A lot of that time is wasted on A) pointless rematches or B) recaps. Why not put the wwe.com interviews on instead? Those are fantastic and help build someone. - Please, no more useless distraction finishes. This week's Raw had way too many of those. - Speaking of this week's Raw, book the champions better. There is no reason for the Women's, IC and Tag Champs to all take a loss in one night. The belts matter people. - Treat it as competition. I know that the entertainment aspect is important for the casual audience and we all know it's pre-determined, but it wouldn't hurt to make sure wins and losses matter. That's just some ideas to help off the top of my head.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on May 10, 2016 18:54:42 GMT -5
Besides a few, I think the current roster is fantastic. Problem is, they just don't utilize enough of them. At least not to their fullest potential. - Stop with the 50/50 booking. The only people that have really gone on to become stars are the ones that either didn't get 50/50 booked (Shield) or broke free of it (Bryan, Punk) - Give us more character development. You have a three hour Raw and two hour Smackdown. A lot of that time is wasted on A) pointless rematches or B) recaps. Why not put the wwe.com interviews on instead? Those are fantastic and help build someone. - Please, no more useless distraction finishes. This week's Raw had way too many of those. - Speaking of this week's Raw, book the champions better. There is no reason for the Women's, IC and Tag Champs to all take a loss in one night. The belts matter people. - Treat it as competition. I know that the entertainment aspect is important for the casual audience and we all know it's pre-determined, but it wouldn't hurt to make sure wins and losses matter. That's just some ideas to help off the top of my head. Can't disagree with any of that.
|
|
|
Post by IRS on May 10, 2016 18:59:34 GMT -5
Besides a few, I think the current roster is fantastic. Problem is, they just don't utilize enough of them. At least not to their fullest potential. - Stop with the 50/50 booking. The only people that have really gone on to become stars are the ones that either didn't get 50/50 booked (Shield) or broke free of it (Bryan, Punk) - Give us more character development. You have a three hour Raw and two hour Smackdown. A lot of that time is wasted on A) pointless rematches or B) recaps. Why not put the wwe.com interviews on instead? Those are fantastic and help build someone. - Please, no more useless distraction finishes. This week's Raw had way too many of those. - Speaking of this week's Raw, book the champions better. There is no reason for the Women's, IC and Tag Champs to all take a loss in one night. The belts matter people. - Treat it as competition. I know that the entertainment aspect is important for the casual audience and we all know it's pre-determined, but it wouldn't hurt to make sure wins and losses matter. That's just some ideas to help off the top of my head. Get out of here with that logic crazy talk!
|
|
|
Post by Rob on May 10, 2016 20:07:06 GMT -5
Basically what i get from this, Raw is going to be even more of a cluster than it already is.
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on May 10, 2016 20:19:01 GMT -5
Considering the fact that the only guy who they put any effort into booking to look strong is Roman Reigns, more people on the roster is the last thing they need. But I guess they're going to need some new talent to feed to both Roman and Cena when he gets back. Vince will make sure there's plenty to go around for both guys.
|
|
KPnDC
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 8, 2013 21:58:21 GMT -5
Posts: 1,754
|
Post by KPnDC on May 10, 2016 20:22:08 GMT -5
13 new people is A LOT! Like seriously. I assume the brand split is coming. I just wish RAW going back to 2hrs was apart of the deal.
|
|
|
Post by K5 on May 11, 2016 9:52:56 GMT -5
roster is larger than ever? pretty sure the invasion era has this capped
|
|
|
Post by J12 on May 11, 2016 9:59:15 GMT -5
Yeah, the 13 includes all of the recent call ups. Lots of interesting stuff out of yesterday's call.
Essentially, WWE could stop doing house shows entirely and still draw a profit. The live event business is so minuscule in comparison to TV Rights and the Network.
Also, for anyone who (insanely) touts that "ratings don't matter" (looking at you, Road Dogg), TV Rights Fees account for nearly 36% of WWE's quarterly profit. So, in other words, if ratings continue to tank, they're going to be in serious trouble when their deal comes up. Unless they find a way to supplement the near 70 million dollars a quarter that they're pulling in from NBCUniversal.
|
|
The Dave
Main Eventer
Con-Chair-Tos all around!
Joined on: Feb 2, 2008 15:29:11 GMT -5
Posts: 3,480
|
Post by The Dave on May 11, 2016 10:12:04 GMT -5
And yet, WWE is all sorts of ass to me these days. So much talent and they can't do a damn thing decent with it.
|
|
|
Post by bigshab421 on May 11, 2016 10:12:40 GMT -5
Yeah, the 13 includes all of the recent call ups. Lots of interesting stuff out of yesterday's call. Essentially, WWE could stop doing house shows entirely and still draw a profit. The live event business is so minuscule in comparison to TV Rights and the Network. Also, for anyone who (insanely) touts that "ratings don't matter" (looking at you, Road Dogg), TV Rights Fees account for nearly 36% of WWE's quarterly profit. So, in other words, if ratings continue to tank, they're going to be in serious trouble when their deal comes up. Unless they find a way to supplement the near 70 million dollars a quarter that they're pulling in from NBCUniversal. I have never quite understood why WWE does so many house shows. It makes sense to keep RAW/SD in the bigger markets and it would be smart to only have one or two house shows a week (Friday & Saturday).
|
|
|
Post by J12 on May 11, 2016 10:20:06 GMT -5
Yeah, the 13 includes all of the recent call ups. Lots of interesting stuff out of yesterday's call. Essentially, WWE could stop doing house shows entirely and still draw a profit. The live event business is so minuscule in comparison to TV Rights and the Network. Also, for anyone who (insanely) touts that "ratings don't matter" (looking at you, Road Dogg), TV Rights Fees account for nearly 36% of WWE's quarterly profit. So, in other words, if ratings continue to tank, they're going to be in serious trouble when their deal comes up. Unless they find a way to supplement the near 70 million dollars a quarter that they're pulling in from NBCUniversal. I have never quite understood why WWE does so many house shows. It makes sense to keep RAW/SD in the bigger markets and it would be smart to only have one or two house shows a week (Friday & Saturday). I think it was profitable for a long time. It also gives them more exposure, but at this point, I think you could argue that they're about as visible in a given market as they're going to get. They changed their house show strategy quite significantly around 2005 when JBL was on top of the Smackdown cards and their shows were tanking. It seems like they might be coming upon a need to rethink the strategy again. I've got a perfect example of their weird tendencies right in my own backyard. WWE used to visit Maine twice a year. We have three viable venues for them to hit - Portland, Augusta, and Bangor. Typically, they'd go in rotation and bring a house show to two out of the three, and then start over the next year with whichever they skipped. In recent years, they've added Lewiston into the mix, and doubled up on their visits. When they run one arena, they tend to sell out. When they run two arenas, they split the audience, fill each building up about 50%, and pay to rent two buildings. They're doing it in July - coming to Bangor on a Saturday night and Augusta on a Sunday afternoon. These venues are less than two hours apart. I'm sandwiched in between the two, and I'll probably hit both shows, but how many people won't do that? Not to mention, they're bringing the same roster, and presumably a similar card, to both. It makes no sense to me, but there must be something that tells them it's the right move. I just don't get it. The idea of cutting back on house shows does bring about a different discussion though - wrestler pay. I wonder how many guys would be willing to take a pay cut in exchange for several extra days a month at home with their families? It's an interesting scenario.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 9:55:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2016 10:23:35 GMT -5
WWETNA
|
|
|
Post by theMOESIAH on May 11, 2016 11:01:41 GMT -5
Why? We just see the same people over and over again as it is. My guess is they cask more people up, others get misused and instead of trying to correct the mistake, we'll see a second round of cuts.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 9:55:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2016 11:08:41 GMT -5
Cool. I can't wait til they add another baker's dozen guys to the already overinflated roster. What the company really needs right now is even more people floating in midcard hell!
|
|
|
Post by gelatinoustapeworm on May 11, 2016 11:28:53 GMT -5
Can anyone read? It's been posted in this thread at least twice. He didn't say 13 new talents would be debuting, he said they have introduced 13 new talents. Past tense!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Chip on May 11, 2016 12:01:45 GMT -5
im fine with this, if they distinguish talent between the two weekly shows.
i dont think there needs to be an actual brand split. with 2 GMs and all this other bullshit. but there needs to be a REASON to watch both RAW & Smackdown every week. There needs to be guys you can only see on either show, and good stories making you want to see them
|
|
|
Post by MADNESS_NH_97 on May 12, 2016 10:44:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Bandalero on May 12, 2016 11:34:50 GMT -5
I'm just curious as to how they are going to book Cena and Roman
Both are the golden children.
The only thing I see that might work is if Cena takes up his veteran role and starts to develop other stars. Otherwise we've got two egos/company men than will not sell and will not lose.
Can you imagine how a feud/match between their current gimmicks would be booked?
|
|