|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jun 19, 2016 22:47:46 GMT -5
This is why we can't have nice things. We get a great finish with Dean walking out as champion. The guy few wanted to win lost... clean. And we are still crapping all over it and predicting how quickly it will all end. Take a breather and enjoy the moment. I understand what you are saying but you (or anyone) can not expect people to enjoy something that they don't enjoy simply because it's what these other people want. Are Rollins fans just supposed to be happy because other people are happy? That's just silly. People need to feel "free" to react how they feel - within reason - without having to take s*** for those feelings. I'm not trying to crawl up your a** or anything. It's just that every pay-per-view thread is the same: Something happens. Some people get mad. People who are happy tell people that are mad to be happy. That's not how this needs to work. Ya know? Maybe I'm just over all this. I'm over being told "enjoy the moment" when I'm unhappy with a show. |
|
|
|
Post by Irish Wrestling Entertainment on Jun 19, 2016 22:47:46 GMT -5
Running with the triple threat at Battleground would be a huge mistake. That's a Summerslam match. Hell, it's a, Wrestlemania match. Agreed. As the poster above says, they could use the draft as a way to hold the triple threat match off until Summerslam. |
|
|
|
Post by HHH316 on Jun 19, 2016 22:50:05 GMT -5
Notice they only took the title off of Reigns so Ambrose didn't pin him for the title. That was my first thought, but then I wondered, why have Rollins pin Reigns clean? Would it have been so bad for Ambrose to pin Reigns? I'm not complaining, I'm fine with the outcome, & it's karma coming back & getting Rollins. |
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Jun 19, 2016 22:50:11 GMT -5
If they really have faith in Ambrose, give him a long run with the title. The guy is the best thing in wrestling and should be the No. 1 babyface in the company. He's the most organic babyface they've had in years. Wouldn't say in years. Daniel Bryan was by far the most organic babyface when he was on top. His last match was about a year ago. I agree, but Bryan's title reign never amounted to anything since he got hurt nearly immediately after he won the title. |
|
Mr. K.O
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 24, 2010 19:04:14 GMT -5
Posts: 4,094
|
Post by Mr. K.O on Jun 19, 2016 22:50:49 GMT -5
So both the Cavs and Ambrose brought a title to Ohio huh.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 4:29:49 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2016 22:50:54 GMT -5
Dean Titty  er Ambrose |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 4:29:49 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2016 22:51:57 GMT -5
Hopefully Ambrose holds the title for a while, we've had a 5 minute Roman reign, then a short Sheamus reign, another Roman reign then a 2 month HHH reign followed by another short Roman reign and a 2 minute Seth reign in the last 7-8 months. The problem during that period is the amount of injuries WWE has had to deal with, which sort of explains the amount of title switches. Not to mention their pro Roman and forget everyone else agenda which sort of backed them into a corner with regards to who could be champion during that time. |
|
|
|
Post by Sizzle on Jun 19, 2016 22:52:28 GMT -5
In my opinion, all these title changes really takes away any meaning the world title is suppose to have. I feel the opposite. These three dying for the title shot and fighting so hard for it just heightens its meaning to me. |
|
TeamratedCDS
Superstar
Joined on: May 12, 2014 20:11:12 GMT -5
Posts: 858 
|
Post by TeamratedCDS on Jun 19, 2016 22:52:46 GMT -5
I marked out for Rollins winning but then I freaked out for Dean cashingnin! Very awesome stuff and it makes me happy to see Ambrose get a break!
|
|
|
|
Post by Irish Wrestling Entertainment on Jun 19, 2016 22:52:47 GMT -5
How can anyone seriously view Ambrose as the world champ? What a ing joke. So now Seth is a two time champ, with a 3 minute title reign.. It's the ultimate revenge for Seth turning on Ambrose and Roman. He won the title and Dean ed him over like Seth ed him over 2 years ago. Take your logic out of here, Booger. |
|
|
|
Post by Ember's Flame on Jun 19, 2016 22:55:08 GMT -5
Triple Threat at Battleground leads to Summerslam:
Dean (C) vs. Reigns
HHH vs. Seth
|
|
|
|
Post by J-MANN on Jun 19, 2016 22:56:35 GMT -5
Triple Threat at Battleground leads to Summerslam: Dean (C) vs. Reigns HHH vs. Seth I just want them to go ahead an officially turn Seth face. Face Seth vs. Heel HHH, I could go for that. |
|
|
|
Post by J-MANN on Jun 19, 2016 22:58:54 GMT -5
An honestly I'm just upset because I want Seth to win his title back, and have a lengthy run with it. One where he's not a coward, and depending on everyone's help to win the match. He proved tonight he'd be a killer baby face. And Roman proved he would be a great heel. I wish the WWE would pull the trigger on that.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 4:29:49 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2016 22:58:56 GMT -5
Title switches work well when it means something and the crowd is behind the guy who is looking to win it. Now if you have multiple superstars who are "ready" in that sense, like Dean and Seth, shorter title reigns are fine because the crowd wants to see these guys with the belt so there is no need for one guy to hold it for 8 months at a time and repeat the same match 3 or 4 times in a row because thats when it becomes stale.
Tonight is a good example of short reigns coming to an end for the better
Take the IC title as a prime example of pointless title changes in recent years
|
|
|
|
Post by J-MANN on Jun 19, 2016 23:01:51 GMT -5
I hope Roman turns on Ambrose, eventually aligning with Triple H as the biggest heel in the company.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Richius on Jun 19, 2016 23:01:52 GMT -5
It was far from the "Greatest MITB PPV ever" but Reigns losing clean will stick in my memory for a while. I'm fan of both Rollins and Ambrose so I don't mind the quick MITB cash-in but I'd be just as happy if he held onto it for a while and cashed in at a future PPV.
In any case, not a very good show. So much of it felt like an average Raw episode.
Here's hoping they mix up the card and give us some fresh match-ups for Battleground. I DO NOT WANT TO SEE AMBROSE VS JERICHO FOR THE WWE WHC! Please oh please let that feud end!
|
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Jun 19, 2016 23:02:00 GMT -5
Title switches work well when it means something and the crowd is behind the guy who is looking to win it. Now if you have multiple superstars who are "ready" in that sense, like Dean and Seth, shorter title reigns are fine because the crowd wants to see these guys with the belt so there is no need for one guy to hold it for 8 months at a time and repeat the same match 3 or 4 times in a row because thats when it becomes stale. I would agree with this, but Roman Reigns being involved pretty much throws all of these plans out the window. If you're telling me we were going to get a straight Rollins and Ambrose feud for the next several months, then I'd definitely agree. But the plan is most likely going to be not if but when Roman gets the title back. |
|
|
|
Post by The Dazzler on Jun 19, 2016 23:13:13 GMT -5
Got hype for Seth, then got hype for Dean but a little less lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Todd Pettengill on Jun 19, 2016 23:13:33 GMT -5
So I was at work for a lot of the show tonight so I've been watching it over. I can't believe I'm saying this but the tag team title match was just awful. Not one team in that match meshed well and I thought someone died about 6 times from botches.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 4:29:49 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2016 23:13:48 GMT -5
Title switches work well when it means something and the crowd is behind the guy who is looking to win it. Now if you have multiple superstars who are "ready" in that sense, like Dean and Seth, shorter title reigns are fine because the crowd wants to see these guys with the belt so there is no need for one guy to hold it for 8 months at a time and repeat the same match 3 or 4 times in a row because thats when it becomes stale. I would agree with this, but Roman Reigns being involved pretty much throws all of these plans out the window. If you're telling me we were going to get a straight Rollins and Ambrose feud for the next several months, then I'd definitely agree. But the plan is most likely going to be not if but when Roman gets the title back. Yeah I agree with that, but in the end 1 of them is getting split from the other 2 with the brand split and I dont really have a clue what they're going to do at this point! |
|
