|
Post by sitruC on Jun 12, 2016 18:58:07 GMT -5
Why can't they just keep the current ones but with the brands taking it in turns to host.
|
|
|
Post by Cassa Nova Kid on Jun 12, 2016 18:58:20 GMT -5
So that means we'll have: RAW, SmackDown, NXT, Main Event, Superstars RAW, SmackDown, NXT, Main Event, Superstars, PPV RAW, SmackDown, NXT, Main Event, Superstars RAW, SmackDown, NXT, Main Event, Superstars, PPV Every. Single. Week. Of. Every. Single. Month. Burnout inc. Yah I am not watching wrestling seven days a weak. - Monday I watch Raw - Tuesday's Smackdown -Wednesday NXT & Superstars - Thursday I watch Impact & ROH - Friday I watch AAA & CMLL - Saturday off - Sunday's PPV ugh lol plus I watch RideAlong Total Divas ,dinner for 3 & swarved & breaking ground
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 6, 2024 7:33:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2016 18:59:35 GMT -5
Hey guys its double the cena and double the roman reigns.. what could possibly go wrong
|
|
|
Post by Jonathan Karate on Jun 12, 2016 19:01:20 GMT -5
We've been on the same page quite a bit the past few days lol Tell me about it. I wouldn't mind if every month we got ONE PPV for just ONE show like it used to be; but two a month, 19+ a year is going to be total overkill. I'd like to see something like this: Make RR, Mania, Summer Slam, Survivor Series, Money In The Bank, and Hell in A Cell (face it this PPV ain't going anywhere) Raw and Smackdown PPVs. Split the other 6 between the two for three brand exclusive PPVs. I think this would give us a perfect mix.
|
|
|
Post by Booger Red on Jun 12, 2016 19:04:44 GMT -5
Two PPVs every months is absolute overkill. I'd be fine if they separate the months for Raw and SamckDown PPVs like it was back when he had the brand split and kept SummerSlam, Survivor Series, Royal Rumble, and WrestleMania as the interpromotional PPVs.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 6, 2024 7:33:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2016 19:06:15 GMT -5
Two PPVs every months is absolute overkill. I'd be fine if they separate the months for Raw and SamckDown PPVs like it was back when he had the brand split and kept SummerSlam, Survivor Series, Royal Rumble, and WrestleMania as the interpromotional PPVs. That would be the logical thing to do
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Jun 12, 2016 19:54:57 GMT -5
When I think of Brand exclusive PPV's Hardcore Holly Vs Mordecia and Billy Gunn Vs Kenzo Suzuki come to mind.
Seriously though I'm an adult now and barely have the time to watch a 3 hour Raw and a monthly PPV. There is no way I can watch Raw, Smackdown and 2 PPV's. I work a lot and cannot dedicate my free time to wrestling it's just too much.
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Jun 12, 2016 19:59:36 GMT -5
this better not happen. its completely unnecessary.
|
|
|
Post by JHTB® on Jun 12, 2016 20:08:50 GMT -5
Way too much. But I do hope it means that they will come to Toronto or any other place that don't get shows often and possibly even stop house shows.
|
|
|
Post by J'Dinkalage Morgoone on Jun 12, 2016 20:15:26 GMT -5
4 hours sunday 3 hours monday 3 hours tuesday 1 hour wednesday
jesus
|
|
|
Post by TheLastDude on Jun 12, 2016 20:19:39 GMT -5
What do you do when your writing staff can't cope with nine shows a month? Add a tenth! Brilliant!!
Seriously.
I don't even know if the WWE could have successfully pulled this off when they were red hot and had an enormous roster...and they want to do it when they're paper-thin on talent and writing and interest is at a low point?
Seriously.
It's like they keep pushing just far enough to see what it will take to go down in flames.
|
|
undertaker16
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 10, 2004 20:51:45 GMT -5
Posts: 1,968
|
Post by undertaker16 on Jun 12, 2016 20:27:44 GMT -5
Every other week is a terrible idea that is what made me lose interest in UFC once a month was perfect.
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Jun 12, 2016 20:29:23 GMT -5
WWE. Take 5 steps forward, 9 steps back. This is going be just like the tail end of the brand split last time, except even worst. Everything is fine the way it is, Why it up? WWE is losing me. Basically whats going to happen: Raw: - Make Roman Reigns look strong - Bunch of half assed 50/50 booking for everyone else Smackdown: - Make Cena look strong - Bunch of half assed 50/50 booking for everyone else. They are taking what most of us hate most about the current product and shoving it down our throats TWICE in a week now.
|
|
|
Post by Ember's Flame on Jun 12, 2016 20:46:06 GMT -5
Not true until I hear it out of Vince's mouth. If true, I'm actually a fan.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jun 12, 2016 21:10:28 GMT -5
If it's all part of the 9.99 we pay per month, then I say the more original content the better. Nobody is forcing me to watch each show, so I say bring it on.
|
|
|
Post by bad guy™ on Jun 12, 2016 22:17:43 GMT -5
If it's all part of the 9.99 we pay per month, then I say the more original content the better. Nobody is forcing me to watch each show, so I say bring it on. Fair point.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 6, 2024 7:33:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2016 22:26:58 GMT -5
If it's all part of the 9.99 we pay per month, then I say the more original content the better. Nobody is forcing me to watch each show, so I say bring it on. Well said.
|
|
|
Post by Nivro™ on Jun 12, 2016 22:40:20 GMT -5
If it's all part of the 9.99 we pay per month, then I say the more original content the better. Nobody is forcing me to watch each show, so I say bring it on. Oh no, just wait..2 PPVs instead of 1 just gives them a reason to hike the Network price up.
|
|
Mr Wrestling Jr.
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 6, 2010 7:07:35 GMT -5
Posts: 3,410
|
Post by Mr Wrestling Jr. on Jun 12, 2016 22:47:24 GMT -5
Ehhhhhhhh, I'd much rather be in favour of 1 PPV a month, four RAW matches and four SmackDown matches. Maybe 1 match from each show on the Kickoff for feuds with lesser build.
|
|
Cameron Stone
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 16, 2013 18:16:15 GMT -5
Posts: 2,014
|
Post by Cameron Stone on Jun 12, 2016 22:53:43 GMT -5
If they do this, amke them two hour shows like the nXt specials. That way, it can have the title matches get well developed, plus a major feud with those, and a couple of well built undercard matches, and not overdo it.
As much as some people knock the old single brand PPVs, they had more time to develop the feuds, so I'd be more ok with switching up who got the ppv each month. I would look more forward to Jamie noble vs Spike dudley that had a build to it than an Orton vs Sheamus match that had no buildup at all. To me, the bigger names don't matter as much as trying to build a compelling narrative
|
|