|
Post by Booger Red on Jul 18, 2016 22:13:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Ember's Flame on Jul 18, 2016 22:13:43 GMT -5
So they saved the conclusion of the main event for the WWE Network, and they didn't even bother to promote that!? I know I found out via Twitter
|
|
|
Post by jessem52 on Jul 18, 2016 22:13:49 GMT -5
So Dean is still champ according to the wwe network.
|
|
|
Post by The Natural Eddy Valintino on Jul 18, 2016 22:13:59 GMT -5
So they saved the conclusion of the main event for the WWE Network, and they didn't even bother to promote that!? I know right?
|
|
|
Post by Sizzle on Jul 18, 2016 22:14:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by jayrod2009 on Jul 18, 2016 22:14:36 GMT -5
So WWE finally has a face champ fans can get behind and they pull a bull crap finish like this. Dean can't even get one clean title defense before loosing it (it's Christian's title reign all over again). Seth brings the WWE Title to Raw. Dean gets a new title on SD and is instantly viewed as the inferior champ. So dumb. Wouldn't it have been a better story that Reigns can beat Dean, Dean can beat Seth, and Seth can beat Roman? But nah, just have Seth beat em both to kill any intrigue. Sorry, Ambrose as champion is as believable as David Arquette. His rebound clothesline is horrendous, and it sickens me seeing Rollins sell it like he was hit by Brock.
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jul 18, 2016 22:15:28 GMT -5
God, if only the show runners were there to restart this and give the fans a finish.. Steph and Foley are the show runners. Steph wanted Rollins as champ. Shane and Bryan have no authority on Raw. Foley wasnt going to go over Steph'a head. They made it clear early in the show that their power doesn't go into effect until next week. Stephanie had no more power than Shane did. Well, at least in theory. In practice, she does, because Raw is already superior.
|
|
|
Post by cordless2016 on Jul 18, 2016 22:15:42 GMT -5
So WWE finally has a face champ fans can get behind and they pull a bull crap finish like this. Dean can't even get one clean title defense before loosing it (it's Christian's title reign all over again). Seth brings the WWE Title to Raw. Dean gets a new title on SD and is instantly viewed as the inferior champ. So dumb. Wouldn't it have been a better story that Reigns can beat Dean, Dean can beat Seth, and Seth can beat Roman? But nah, just have Seth beat em both to kill any intrigue. Sorry, Ambrose as champion is as believable as David Arquette. His rebound clothesline is horrendous, and it sickens me seeing Rollins sell it like he was hit by Brock. Yeah, must be why the mass fans are behind him every week...
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 6:27:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2016 22:17:56 GMT -5
Seriously WTF WWE?!
|
|
|
Post by jayrod2009 on Jul 18, 2016 22:17:57 GMT -5
Sorry, Ambrose as champion is as believable as David Arquette. His rebound clothesline is horrendous, and it sickens me seeing Rollins sell it like he was hit by Brock. Yeah, must be why the mass fans are behind him every week... What else can they choose from? Roman? I'd choose Ambrose too between the two. Rollins should be on the mountain. With Styles next in line, followed by a KO run culminating with a blood feud blow off with Zayne.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 6:27:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2016 22:18:33 GMT -5
So urm.. was that meant to happen or did Steph just forget that when a draw occurs, the champ retains? what the hell are they doing? Stupid way to go off air, im not too bothered about the result, more so about the lack of clarity.
|
|
|
Post by Todd Pettengill on Jul 18, 2016 22:18:45 GMT -5
Did they even announce to stay tuned to the Network after they went off the air?
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jul 18, 2016 22:19:19 GMT -5
Lol at going live on the Network cold. This whole thing is a mess.
All they've done here is given another reason to not care about the Shield Triple threat that we've all been waiting for. First Roman, now it's for a title that may be split by the time they get to the Pay Per View.
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Jul 18, 2016 22:19:28 GMT -5
I see they went with the wcw 2000 ending. Bold choice cotton. Let's see if it pays off.
|
|
|
Post by The Dazzler on Jul 18, 2016 22:21:57 GMT -5
Where can you rewatch the network exclusive ending? Can't seem to find it anywhere
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 6:27:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2016 22:22:25 GMT -5
That RAW pretty much summed up the company for at least the past 7/8 years. Can produce a great show, but it rarely happens, and when it does there's always a ridiculous up too.
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jul 18, 2016 22:22:29 GMT -5
So urm.. was that meant to happen or did Steph just forget that when a draw occurs, the champ retains? what the hell are they doing? Stupid way to go off air, im not too bothered about the result, more so about the lack of clarity. I would almost guarantee it was done to show Stephanie's superiority. But it wasn't the actual result they wanted, so they quietly backtracked on the Network. Whenever in doubt about WWE's motivation for doing something, first question whether or not what they did somehow made a McMahon look powerful (typically Stephanie.) If the answer is "yes", you have your answer.
|
|
|
Post by Kanenite on Jul 18, 2016 22:24:30 GMT -5
There's gonna be so much confusion tomorrow because everyone will think Rollins is the champ
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 6:27:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2016 22:25:45 GMT -5
Where can you rewatch the network exclusive ending? Can't seem to find it anywhere Click on whats showing right now and rewind, you'll find it.
|
|
|
Post by Todd Pettengill on Jul 18, 2016 22:26:10 GMT -5
Jim Cornette has some things to say.
|
|