|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Aug 1, 2016 15:15:25 GMT -5
That will never happen. The WWE sees these types of matches as PPV events now. Anything to sell a PPV. And plus with this era not having blood or violence, a lot of these matches just make no sense to have anymore. Not saying blood and violence has to be in every match, but I did find the HIAC match with Lesnar vs. Taker last year to be much more enjoyable with the blood being involved from both men. It was a great match and I heard a story that Vince was furious at both men for the blood loss. And yet it was the only HIAC match in quite some time that fans enjoyed and were invested into. I get that Vince doesn't want blood anymore, but maybe get rid of these matches that come with blood loss. Plus it really does take away the appeal to it when you know that every October you will have two HIAC matches. At one time, it was about ending a feud. Not a yearly tradition.
|
|
|
Post by Escape The Rules on Aug 1, 2016 15:21:52 GMT -5
I'm glad they scrapped the EC PPV, it was done to death. I liked when the announcement of an Elimination Chamber was a surprise in it's early years. Hopefully the next one is a good one.
That Elimination Chamber for the IC title last year was absolutely awful.
|
|
|
Post by Rude Awakening on Aug 1, 2016 16:57:09 GMT -5
It was a great match and I heard a story that Vince was furious at both men for the blood loss. And yet it was the only HIAC match in quite some time that fans enjoyed and were invested into. I get that Vince doesn't want blood anymore, but maybe get rid of these matches that come with blood loss. Plus it really does take away the appeal to it when you know that every October you will have two HIAC matches. At one time, it was about ending a feud. Not a yearly tradition. I don't know what Vince is thinking. When I was very young I thought it was awesome when someone bled. It added a more real feel and made things more intense.
|
|