|
Post by BSR on Sept 11, 2016 13:54:49 GMT -5
It's called keeping you interested.
If they blow their load in a week then Wtf do we have to look forward to.
|
|
rob29
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Oct 26, 2012 16:40:46 GMT -5
Posts: 386
|
Post by rob29 on Sept 12, 2016 12:18:28 GMT -5
Does it piss anyone else off that WWE does things storyline-wise and offers little-to-no explanation for ANY OF IT? Triple H isn't seen for over 5 months. Shockingly returns on RAW to cost Rollins the Universal Championship. How is Triple H NOT the opening segment the next week letting us know exactly why he did what he did? How do you let this cool off and not strike the iron while its hot? And why have Owens come out in a suit to just say that he pretty much had the match won anyway without Triple H and did 98% of the work himself. If he was coming out in a suit, he needed to be WITH Triple H and Triple H needed to explain. Look at what they did with Sting. He made his debut on Survivor Series, arguably one of the craziest things we've never expected to ever see......we don't see him again until JANUARY and we don't hear him actually speak until 2 weeks before Wrestlemania. That's a lot of leaving the fans hanging. Why do they never explain where Brock Lesnar goes for months at a time? There are how many matches to determine contenders for Titles....Brock is a "prize fighter".....how is he never in these tournements for the vacant title, six pack challenges to determine who gets title shots, or fatal four way matches to see who gets a title? Ignoring his absences is always worse than if they were just like "Brock doesn't really like to work that much", which we all know is the real reason. Is Vince McMahon senile? Are the writers just that bad? It just seems like WWE stories lack logic and continuity and they always start stuff that has the potential to be very entertaining, but they just never capitalize on it and it loses so much interest during the cool down period. The next time we see Triple H could be so long from now that it won't even matter to anybody why he did what he did anymore. The moment will have passed. Agree with you 100%. Not having Hunter turn up the following week to explain his actions - was absolutely mind boggling, couldn't fathom that out at all.
|
|
KPnDC
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 8, 2013 21:58:21 GMT -5
Posts: 1,754
|
Post by KPnDC on Sept 12, 2016 15:15:12 GMT -5
It's WWE being WWE. If they don't care, why should I. It's why I watch their product less and less.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Sept 12, 2016 16:07:22 GMT -5
I'd hate to watch a movie with any of you. Because by the sounds of it, you skip right to the end.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 29, 2024 12:26:55 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2016 16:13:06 GMT -5
Lorenzo Alcazar Vince McMahon doesn't even know who lower card champions are so im sure WWE leaves stuf hanging because vince is stupid.
|
|
rob29
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Oct 26, 2012 16:40:46 GMT -5
Posts: 386
|
Post by rob29 on Sept 19, 2016 14:35:48 GMT -5
It's called keeping you interested. If they blow their load in a week then Wtf do we have to look forward to. Yeah that's true to a degree, to a certain extent yes - however WWE still make dumb moves, absolutely mind-boggling decisions. I mean having Hunter cost Rollins the universal title - and then not showing up the following week to explain his actions, just left fans scratching their heads, wondering what???. Also not having Brock Lesnar show up raw (the night after summerslam) to explain why he F5'd Shane Mcmahon, and his actions towards making Randy bleed - made zero sense.
|
|