|
Post by ~ Cymru ~ on Sept 21, 2016 7:41:54 GMT -5
Some people here sound like parents telling their kids they're wasting money on *inset item here * if WWE see something in TNA worth 40mil then I trust their judgement, weather that's just for the video archive, or the show itself.
I don't really want to see an invasion angle at this point. The only parts about TNA that I've enjoyed in thr past few months are Decay and The Hardys. If this was a few years back it would have been cool to see AJ, Joe, Bobby Roode, Austin Aries, James Storm and Abyss invade thr WWE but their top talent is gone. I canT get behind the talent that TNA has at this point.
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Sept 21, 2016 11:39:40 GMT -5
$40m in real money is £30.6m. If Paul Pogba is worth £89m and has been nothing but shambolic since his return, TNA can be worth £30.6m. The other thing to consider is that TNA has an American telly deal as well as a large network of telly deals all over the world. WCW was without a station and no one was willing to bring it into the fold, so it was worth nothing. In reality, WCW had all but shut itself by the time WWF bought it. I say, pay what it takes to get the video library and trademarks, let the TNA wrestlers that are worth a damn go to ROH and the rest can find a job at ASDA. Paul Pogba? www.skysports.com/football/news/11667/10528626/paul-pogba-joins-manchester-united-for-world-record-89m
|
|